Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 649 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
32401 Impact VBC 18 1393 4-4 44% 18 NY
32402 PBEVC Lightning 15-2 1393 28-36 44% 15 TX
32403 Paris Crush 15 1393 1-4 20% 15 KY
32404 SUSA 15-Navy 1392 7-20 23% 15 UT
32405 QC Panthers 15-Blue 1392 3-8 23% 15 IA
32406 Libby Volleyball Club 14 Libby Logger Blue 1392 4-7 24% 14
32407 Blacktail Volleyball Club 15 BTVC-Dani (IM) 1392 3-8 23% 15 UT
32408 BAREFOOT 17-Red 1392 1-3 25% 17 TX
32409 Ozark Juniors 10-Gray 1392 1-3 25% 10 AR
32410 Southern Elite Volleyball Club 12-1 1392 1-4 20% 12 AL
32411 CGY Bulls Volleyball Club 16 16U CGY Bulls Red 1392 2-5 29% 16
32412 MAVS KC Select 10-2 1392 1-2 20% 10 KS
32413 Metro Heat Volleyball Club G15-1 1392 5-3 63% 15 MO
32414 Hot Shots 12-1 1392 4-3 57% 12 TX
32415 Kokoro Volleyball 16 Wht 1392 26-23 53% 16 MN
32416 Cincy Classics 16-Gray 1392 16-14 53% 16 OH
32417 Top Select 12-Gold blue 1392 14-19 42% 12 FL
32418 TEMPO 12-White 1392 8-11 42% 12 WI
32419 KIVA 12-Purple 1392 24-34 41% 12 KY
32420 HEAT 13-Kassy 1392 7-10 41% 13 FL
32421 Titans 16 1392 10-14 40% 16 VA
32422 KKVC 14-Csd - blue 1392 1-4 20% 14 SD
32423 SJVBC Girls 16-Red 1392 1-4 20% 16 NJ
32424 BVA 13-Regional 1392 12-16 40% 13 MD
32425 A5 Gwinnett 18-Courtney 1392 18-27 40% 18 GA
32426 EVC 12-Green 1392 4-6 40% 12 IL
32427 Cicero Elite SS 13-Purple 1392 4-6 40% 13 IL
32428 GSI 16-Lime venice 1392 12-18 40% 16 FL
32429 VU 14 1392 12-18 40% 14 MS
32430 Club One AZ 14-Iron 1392 26-40 39% 14 AZ
32431 NorthU 13-R orange 1392 1-4 20% 13 PA
32432 MN Attack 12-2 1392 1-4 20% 12 MN
32433 PEAK 15-1 1392 1-4 20% 15 SC
32434 NANI O WAIMEA 18 1392 1-4 20% 18 HI
32435 HCVC 11-1 1392 1-4 20% 11 OH
32436 JM 10-Orange 1392 0-3 0% 10 TX
32437 THNDR 14-2 1392 1-4 20% 14 OH
32438 Forge Dynasty 15-1 1392 1-3 20% 15 TX
32439 HAILI 18 1392 1-4 20% 18 HI
32440 NW Elite 12-4 white 1392 12-18 39% 12 OR
32441 Club V South TA Elite 16-Starlie 1392 0-2 0% 16 UT
32442 ETU 12-Navy 1392 0-3 0% 12 TX
32443 BAVA Genesis 12 1392 0-3 0% 12 TX
32444 White Hawks 11-3 1392 0-3 0% 11 MN
32445 Elevate Ak Volleyball Club 18 13 Presley (AK) 1392 0-4 0% 18 AK
32446 SKY Elite 14-White 1392 7-11 39% 14 PA
32447 NSVBC 17-Select white 1392 8-13 38% 17 WI
32448 WCJ 11-3 1392 1-4 17% 11 TX
32449 MBVC 18 1392 0-4 0% 18 CA
32450 Journey 12 1392 1-4 13% 12 IA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.