2025-2026 Season — Page 649 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32401 | Impact VBC 18 | 1393 | 4-4 | 44% | 18 | NY |
| 32402 | PBEVC Lightning 15-2 | 1393 | 28-36 | 44% | 15 | TX |
| 32403 | Paris Crush 15 | 1393 | 1-4 | 20% | 15 | KY |
| 32404 | SUSA 15-Navy | 1392 | 7-20 | 23% | 15 | UT |
| 32405 | QC Panthers 15-Blue | 1392 | 3-8 | 23% | 15 | IA |
| 32406 | Libby Volleyball Club 14 Libby Logger Blue | 1392 | 4-7 | 24% | 14 | |
| 32407 | Blacktail Volleyball Club 15 BTVC-Dani (IM) | 1392 | 3-8 | 23% | 15 | UT |
| 32408 | BAREFOOT 17-Red | 1392 | 1-3 | 25% | 17 | TX |
| 32409 | Ozark Juniors 10-Gray | 1392 | 1-3 | 25% | 10 | AR |
| 32410 | Southern Elite Volleyball Club 12-1 | 1392 | 1-4 | 20% | 12 | AL |
| 32411 | CGY Bulls Volleyball Club 16 16U CGY Bulls Red | 1392 | 2-5 | 29% | 16 | |
| 32412 | MAVS KC Select 10-2 | 1392 | 1-2 | 20% | 10 | KS |
| 32413 | Metro Heat Volleyball Club G15-1 | 1392 | 5-3 | 63% | 15 | MO |
| 32414 | Hot Shots 12-1 | 1392 | 4-3 | 57% | 12 | TX |
| 32415 | Kokoro Volleyball 16 Wht | 1392 | 26-23 | 53% | 16 | MN |
| 32416 | Cincy Classics 16-Gray | 1392 | 16-14 | 53% | 16 | OH |
| 32417 | Top Select 12-Gold blue | 1392 | 14-19 | 42% | 12 | FL |
| 32418 | TEMPO 12-White | 1392 | 8-11 | 42% | 12 | WI |
| 32419 | KIVA 12-Purple | 1392 | 24-34 | 41% | 12 | KY |
| 32420 | HEAT 13-Kassy | 1392 | 7-10 | 41% | 13 | FL |
| 32421 | Titans 16 | 1392 | 10-14 | 40% | 16 | VA |
| 32422 | KKVC 14-Csd - blue | 1392 | 1-4 | 20% | 14 | SD |
| 32423 | SJVBC Girls 16-Red | 1392 | 1-4 | 20% | 16 | NJ |
| 32424 | BVA 13-Regional | 1392 | 12-16 | 40% | 13 | MD |
| 32425 | A5 Gwinnett 18-Courtney | 1392 | 18-27 | 40% | 18 | GA |
| 32426 | EVC 12-Green | 1392 | 4-6 | 40% | 12 | IL |
| 32427 | Cicero Elite SS 13-Purple | 1392 | 4-6 | 40% | 13 | IL |
| 32428 | GSI 16-Lime venice | 1392 | 12-18 | 40% | 16 | FL |
| 32429 | VU 14 | 1392 | 12-18 | 40% | 14 | MS |
| 32430 | Club One AZ 14-Iron | 1392 | 26-40 | 39% | 14 | AZ |
| 32431 | NorthU 13-R orange | 1392 | 1-4 | 20% | 13 | PA |
| 32432 | MN Attack 12-2 | 1392 | 1-4 | 20% | 12 | MN |
| 32433 | PEAK 15-1 | 1392 | 1-4 | 20% | 15 | SC |
| 32434 | NANI O WAIMEA 18 | 1392 | 1-4 | 20% | 18 | HI |
| 32435 | HCVC 11-1 | 1392 | 1-4 | 20% | 11 | OH |
| 32436 | JM 10-Orange | 1392 | 0-3 | 0% | 10 | TX |
| 32437 | THNDR 14-2 | 1392 | 1-4 | 20% | 14 | OH |
| 32438 | Forge Dynasty 15-1 | 1392 | 1-3 | 20% | 15 | TX |
| 32439 | HAILI 18 | 1392 | 1-4 | 20% | 18 | HI |
| 32440 | NW Elite 12-4 white | 1392 | 12-18 | 39% | 12 | OR |
| 32441 | Club V South TA Elite 16-Starlie | 1392 | 0-2 | 0% | 16 | UT |
| 32442 | ETU 12-Navy | 1392 | 0-3 | 0% | 12 | TX |
| 32443 | BAVA Genesis 12 | 1392 | 0-3 | 0% | 12 | TX |
| 32444 | White Hawks 11-3 | 1392 | 0-3 | 0% | 11 | MN |
| 32445 | Elevate Ak Volleyball Club 18 13 Presley (AK) | 1392 | 0-4 | 0% | 18 | AK |
| 32446 | SKY Elite 14-White | 1392 | 7-11 | 39% | 14 | PA |
| 32447 | NSVBC 17-Select white | 1392 | 8-13 | 38% | 17 | WI |
| 32448 | WCJ 11-3 | 1392 | 1-4 | 17% | 11 | TX |
| 32449 | MBVC 18 | 1392 | 0-4 | 0% | 18 | CA |
| 32450 | Journey 12 | 1392 | 1-4 | 13% | 12 | IA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.