2025-2026 Season — Page 640 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31951 | Dime 12-Fresh | 1397 | 17-23 | 43% | 12 | CA |
| 31952 | Ta'ahine LV 12 | 1397 | 1-2 | 33% | 12 | NV |
| 31953 | LAVBC 12-Black | 1397 | 17-32 | 35% | 12 | CA |
| 31954 | Cajun Elite 14-Kerri | 1397 | 12-13 | 46% | 14 | LA |
| 31955 | MPV 15-Eilte white | 1397 | 0-3 | 0% | 15 | UT |
| 31956 | Sanpte Elite 15 | 1397 | 9-10 | 41% | 15 | UT |
| 31957 | Top Gun 12-Black | 1397 | 3-3 | 50% | 12 | MI |
| 31958 | Rice City 14-Blue | 1397 | 11-14 | 41% | 14 | LA |
| 31959 | NVPUR 18-Tomas davila | 1397 | 2-5 | 29% | 18 | PR |
| 31960 | TUV 11-Black | 1397 | 0-3 | 0% | 11 | TX |
| 31961 | Maceteras Volleyball Club 15 15 Blue Carlos | 1397 | 1-4 | 20% | 15 | PR |
| 31962 | CYDI 11-White | 1397 | 10-12 | 42% | 11 | TX |
| 31963 | Bootheel SMASH 12 Bootheel SMASH Fierce (GW) | 1397 | 1-4 | 20% | 12 | MO |
| 31964 | PSC 11 | 1397 | 3-7 | 27% | 11 | AR |
| 31965 | STRIKE 15-Blue | 1397 | 27-23 | 53% | 15 | AZ |
| 31966 | MSEVC 13-1 | 1397 | 14-23 | 38% | 13 | KY |
| 31967 | TX Infinity 14-S white | 1397 | 9-15 | 36% | 14 | TX |
| 31968 | Atlanta Extreme 14 Andy | 1397 | 16-41 | 28% | 14 | GA |
| 31969 | NEA Tomahawks 16-Pink | 1397 | 12-13 | 48% | 16 | TN |
| 31970 | SCVC 16-1 nikki | 1397 | 14-16 | 47% | 16 | TN |
| 31971 | Sky High Adidas 17-White | 1397 | 0-3 | 0% | 17 | IL |
| 31972 | GRIT 15-Premier -2 | 1397 | 16-19 | 46% | 15 | AL |
| 31973 | Ark Volley 15-Regional | 1397 | 16-17 | 48% | 15 | AR |
| 31974 | OCR 11-Gold | 1397 | 12-24 | 33% | 11 | CA |
| 31975 | CJ Heat 15-Black 3 | 1397 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | NJ |
| 31976 | Sportime 15-Silver | 1397 | 16-26 | 38% | 15 | NY |
| 31977 | Ho'oikaika VBC 16-1 | 1397 | 1-5 | 17% | 16 | CA |
| 31978 | Point Break VBC 16 Darvy | 1397 | 13-23 | 36% | 16 | CA |
| 31979 | Dinamite 18-MARIA | 1397 | 14-19 | 42% | 18 | CA |
| 31980 | TEV 15-Aubrey/ashley | 1397 | 12-13 | 48% | 15 | TN |
| 31981 | SEVA 17 Crimson | 1397 | 28-26 | 52% | 17 | TN |
| 31982 | SPVC 18-Keith | 1397 | 7-4 | 54% | 18 | CA |
| 31983 | Air Assault Volleyball Club LLC 17 AAVC 17/18FS | 1397 | 7-8 | 47% | 17 | IL |
| 31984 | Garden Oaks 13-2 green | 1397 | 6-6 | 50% | 13 | TX |
| 31985 | Taber WHAM! 15-Girls black | 1396 | 2-5 | 29% | 15 | |
| 31986 | MAVS KC 12-4 | 1396 | 3-7 | 20% | 12 | KS |
| 31987 | Kūlia 14 | 1396 | 2-6 | 18% | 14 | HI |
| 31988 | Diamond Volleyball Academy 13 DVA BLUE | 1396 | 0-3 | 0% | 13 | FL |
| 31989 | Giants 13-1 | 1396 | 3-5 | 38% | 13 | MN |
| 31990 | NSTVB 15-Stars | 1396 | 1-3 | 20% | 15 | |
| 31991 | MN Freeze 14-Blue | 1396 | 6-9 | 40% | 14 | MN |
| 31992 | The Edge 14 Silver | 1396 | 15-22 | 41% | 14 | IL |
| 31993 | NWAS VBC 18-National | 1396 | 29-40 | 42% | 18 | WA |
| 31994 | EliteZ 16-Girls hp black | 1396 | 16-19 | 46% | 16 | NH |
| 31995 | London Snipers 15 Mercs | 1396 | 5-6 | 45% | 15 | |
| 31996 | Twin Cities Elite 16-1 | 1396 | 9-11 | 45% | 16 | MN |
| 31997 | Golden Chaos 14 Golden Chaos | 1396 | 3-5 | 38% | 14 | |
| 31998 | Integrity 15-Club blue | 1396 | 11-15 | 37% | 15 | PA |
| 31999 | MCV 13-1 | 1396 | 1-4 | 20% | 13 | NC |
| 32000 | EliteVBTC 15-White | 1396 | 16-20 | 44% | 15 | OH |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.