Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 640 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
31951 Dime 12-Fresh 1397 17-23 43% 12 CA
31952 Ta'ahine LV 12 1397 1-2 33% 12 NV
31953 LAVBC 12-Black 1397 17-32 35% 12 CA
31954 Cajun Elite 14-Kerri 1397 12-13 46% 14 LA
31955 MPV 15-Eilte white 1397 0-3 0% 15 UT
31956 Sanpte Elite 15 1397 9-10 41% 15 UT
31957 Top Gun 12-Black 1397 3-3 50% 12 MI
31958 Rice City 14-Blue 1397 11-14 41% 14 LA
31959 NVPUR 18-Tomas davila 1397 2-5 29% 18 PR
31960 TUV 11-Black 1397 0-3 0% 11 TX
31961 Maceteras Volleyball Club 15 15 Blue Carlos 1397 1-4 20% 15 PR
31962 CYDI 11-White 1397 10-12 42% 11 TX
31963 Bootheel SMASH 12 Bootheel SMASH Fierce (GW) 1397 1-4 20% 12 MO
31964 PSC 11 1397 3-7 27% 11 AR
31965 STRIKE 15-Blue 1397 27-23 53% 15 AZ
31966 MSEVC 13-1 1397 14-23 38% 13 KY
31967 TX Infinity 14-S white 1397 9-15 36% 14 TX
31968 Atlanta Extreme 14 Andy 1397 16-41 28% 14 GA
31969 NEA Tomahawks 16-Pink 1397 12-13 48% 16 TN
31970 SCVC 16-1 nikki 1397 14-16 47% 16 TN
31971 Sky High Adidas 17-White 1397 0-3 0% 17 IL
31972 GRIT 15-Premier -2 1397 16-19 46% 15 AL
31973 Ark Volley 15-Regional 1397 16-17 48% 15 AR
31974 OCR 11-Gold 1397 12-24 33% 11 CA
31975 CJ Heat 15-Black 3 1397 2-3 40% 15 NJ
31976 Sportime 15-Silver 1397 16-26 38% 15 NY
31977 Ho'oikaika VBC 16-1 1397 1-5 17% 16 CA
31978 Point Break VBC 16 Darvy 1397 13-23 36% 16 CA
31979 Dinamite 18-MARIA 1397 14-19 42% 18 CA
31980 TEV 15-Aubrey/ashley 1397 12-13 48% 15 TN
31981 SEVA 17 Crimson 1397 28-26 52% 17 TN
31982 SPVC 18-Keith 1397 7-4 54% 18 CA
31983 Air Assault Volleyball Club LLC 17 AAVC 17/18FS 1397 7-8 47% 17 IL
31984 Garden Oaks 13-2 green 1397 6-6 50% 13 TX
31985 Taber WHAM! 15-Girls black 1396 2-5 29% 15
31986 MAVS KC 12-4 1396 3-7 20% 12 KS
31987 Kūlia 14 1396 2-6 18% 14 HI
31988 Diamond Volleyball Academy 13 DVA BLUE 1396 0-3 0% 13 FL
31989 Giants 13-1 1396 3-5 38% 13 MN
31990 NSTVB 15-Stars 1396 1-3 20% 15
31991 MN Freeze 14-Blue 1396 6-9 40% 14 MN
31992 The Edge 14 Silver 1396 15-22 41% 14 IL
31993 NWAS VBC 18-National 1396 29-40 42% 18 WA
31994 EliteZ 16-Girls hp black 1396 16-19 46% 16 NH
31995 London Snipers 15 Mercs 1396 5-6 45% 15
31996 Twin Cities Elite 16-1 1396 9-11 45% 16 MN
31997 Golden Chaos 14 Golden Chaos 1396 3-5 38% 14
31998 Integrity 15-Club blue 1396 11-15 37% 15 PA
31999 MCV 13-1 1396 1-4 20% 13 NC
32000 EliteVBTC 15-White 1396 16-20 44% 15 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.