2025-2026 Season — Page 639 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31901 | Mavericks 16-Hybrid | 1397 | 9-9 | 45% | 16 | MI |
| 31902 | Trinity Lutheran 13 | 1397 | 1-3 | 25% | 13 | IA |
| 31903 | HOVA 14-A blue | 1397 | 5-11 | 31% | 14 | OH |
| 31904 | OBX Wave 14-1 | 1397 | 2-5 | 29% | 14 | NC |
| 31905 | Net Force 11-Red | 1397 | 1-4 | 20% | 11 | MO |
| 31906 | Bandits VBA 14-1 | 1397 | 8-11 | 42% | 14 | AZ |
| 31907 | HWAVE 16-1 | 1397 | 0-3 | 0% | 16 | NJ |
| 31908 | SEVC 15 National | 1397 | 18-33 | 35% | 15 | WA |
| 31909 | Limitless 16-Fury | 1397 | 25-23 | 52% | 16 | MD |
| 31910 | GVC 18-3 | 1397 | 2-7 | 20% | 18 | AL |
| 31911 | LHV Girls 16-1 surge | 1397 | 18-37 | 33% | 16 | MA |
| 31912 | L2 13-2 | 1397 | 25-36 | 41% | 13 | MI |
| 31913 | Rev 12-Pumas | 1397 | 2-6 | 25% | 12 | IN |
| 31914 | Westman Wave 17 | 1397 | 3-5 | 38% | 17 | NE |
| 31915 | Beach Elite 18-Gold | 1397 | 9-15 | 32% | 18 | UT |
| 31916 | AVC 18-2 | 1397 | 11-11 | 46% | 18 | MT |
| 31917 | Battle 15 | 1397 | 33-36 | 47% | 15 | VA |
| 31918 | Avalanche 16-Elite | 1397 | 8-22 | 25% | 16 | MT |
| 31919 | Pipeline 13-Swift ian | 1397 | 16-18 | 47% | 13 | CA |
| 31920 | Lady Panthers 10 | 1397 | 1-5 | 8% | 10 | IA |
| 31921 | IVC 11-Purple | 1397 | 0-3 | 0% | 11 | IA |
| 31922 | Apex Volleyball Club 14-Sparks | 1397 | 2-5 | 29% | 14 | MO |
| 31923 | OK Charge South 14-2 | 1397 | 20-27 | 43% | 14 | OK |
| 31924 | STVA 16-Red-2 | 1397 | 22-28 | 43% | 16 | TX |
| 31925 | 417 MoJrs 15-Reg white | 1397 | 3-7 | 30% | 15 | MO |
| 31926 | Club Fusion 13-Heat | 1397 | 4-7 | 36% | 13 | IL |
| 31927 | NK 12-Maroon | 1397 | 4-7 | 29% | 12 | ND |
| 31928 | VOLT 12-Surge | 1397 | 4-6 | 33% | 12 | ND |
| 31929 | NPJO 13-Black | 1397 | 2-10 | 17% | 13 | MN |
| 31930 | OVVC 11-Blue | 1397 | 1-3 | 25% | 11 | OH |
| 31931 | HOVA 11-R white | 1397 | 1-4 | 20% | 11 | OH |
| 31932 | Elite Vision 14-1 | 1397 | 14-21 | 40% | 14 | FL |
| 31933 | 407 14-White | 1397 | 25-36 | 41% | 14 | FL |
| 31934 | Southern Swing 13-BLUE | 1397 | 6-7 | 46% | 13 | TX |
| 31935 | Ignite AZ 14-Heat | 1397 | 20-22 | 48% | 14 | AZ |
| 31936 | Chicago Elite 15 Nike | 1397 | 24-35 | 41% | 15 | IL |
| 31937 | Wichita Legacy 16-2 | 1397 | 4-5 | 36% | 16 | KS |
| 31938 | GVC 13-2 | 1397 | 12-21 | 36% | 13 | CT |
| 31939 | SCV Galaxy 16-1 | 1397 | 7-9 | 44% | 16 | WI |
| 31940 | CLUB GEMINI 17-Freeze | 1397 | 6-13 | 30% | 17 | MO |
| 31941 | Huskies 14-Pr | 1397 | 1-4 | 20% | 14 | PR |
| 31942 | DE Eagles 10-Blue | 1397 | 1-9 | 9% | 10 | MN |
| 31943 | Volley Pro 17-Black | 1397 | 3-13 | 18% | 17 | TX |
| 31944 | Cavalier Ignite 16-1 | 1397 | 5-6 | 45% | 16 | ND |
| 31945 | SynergyForce 15-Blue | 1397 | 11-16 | 41% | 15 | CA |
| 31946 | Sanford Sports 13-Black | 1397 | 29-45 | 39% | 13 | SD |
| 31947 | Headlines VBC 16-Orange | 1397 | 22-33 | 40% | 16 | OH |
| 31948 | War Eagle 13-1 blast | 1397 | 12-14 | 44% | 13 | AZ |
| 31949 | NNJ 12-Black | 1397 | 5-13 | 28% | 12 | NV |
| 31950 | FoothillVBC 12-Red | 1397 | 24-21 | 53% | 12 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.