Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 639 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
31901 Mavericks 16-Hybrid 1397 9-9 45% 16 MI
31902 Trinity Lutheran 13 1397 1-3 25% 13 IA
31903 HOVA 14-A blue 1397 5-11 31% 14 OH
31904 OBX Wave 14-1 1397 2-5 29% 14 NC
31905 Net Force 11-Red 1397 1-4 20% 11 MO
31906 Bandits VBA 14-1 1397 8-11 42% 14 AZ
31907 HWAVE 16-1 1397 0-3 0% 16 NJ
31908 SEVC 15 National 1397 18-33 35% 15 WA
31909 Limitless 16-Fury 1397 25-23 52% 16 MD
31910 GVC 18-3 1397 2-7 20% 18 AL
31911 LHV Girls 16-1 surge 1397 18-37 33% 16 MA
31912 L2 13-2 1397 25-36 41% 13 MI
31913 Rev 12-Pumas 1397 2-6 25% 12 IN
31914 Westman Wave 17 1397 3-5 38% 17 NE
31915 Beach Elite 18-Gold 1397 9-15 32% 18 UT
31916 AVC 18-2 1397 11-11 46% 18 MT
31917 Battle 15 1397 33-36 47% 15 VA
31918 Avalanche 16-Elite 1397 8-22 25% 16 MT
31919 Pipeline 13-Swift ian 1397 16-18 47% 13 CA
31920 Lady Panthers 10 1397 1-5 8% 10 IA
31921 IVC 11-Purple 1397 0-3 0% 11 IA
31922 Apex Volleyball Club 14-Sparks 1397 2-5 29% 14 MO
31923 OK Charge South 14-2 1397 20-27 43% 14 OK
31924 STVA 16-Red-2 1397 22-28 43% 16 TX
31925 417 MoJrs 15-Reg white 1397 3-7 30% 15 MO
31926 Club Fusion 13-Heat 1397 4-7 36% 13 IL
31927 NK 12-Maroon 1397 4-7 29% 12 ND
31928 VOLT 12-Surge 1397 4-6 33% 12 ND
31929 NPJO 13-Black 1397 2-10 17% 13 MN
31930 OVVC 11-Blue 1397 1-3 25% 11 OH
31931 HOVA 11-R white 1397 1-4 20% 11 OH
31932 Elite Vision 14-1 1397 14-21 40% 14 FL
31933 407 14-White 1397 25-36 41% 14 FL
31934 Southern Swing 13-BLUE 1397 6-7 46% 13 TX
31935 Ignite AZ 14-Heat 1397 20-22 48% 14 AZ
31936 Chicago Elite 15 Nike 1397 24-35 41% 15 IL
31937 Wichita Legacy 16-2 1397 4-5 36% 16 KS
31938 GVC 13-2 1397 12-21 36% 13 CT
31939 SCV Galaxy 16-1 1397 7-9 44% 16 WI
31940 CLUB GEMINI 17-Freeze 1397 6-13 30% 17 MO
31941 Huskies 14-Pr 1397 1-4 20% 14 PR
31942 DE Eagles 10-Blue 1397 1-9 9% 10 MN
31943 Volley Pro 17-Black 1397 3-13 18% 17 TX
31944 Cavalier Ignite 16-1 1397 5-6 45% 16 ND
31945 SynergyForce 15-Blue 1397 11-16 41% 15 CA
31946 Sanford Sports 13-Black 1397 29-45 39% 13 SD
31947 Headlines VBC 16-Orange 1397 22-33 40% 16 OH
31948 War Eagle 13-1 blast 1397 12-14 44% 13 AZ
31949 NNJ 12-Black 1397 5-13 28% 12 NV
31950 FoothillVBC 12-Red 1397 24-21 53% 12 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.