Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 617 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
30801 Ga Fusion 14-1 1408 17-23 41% 14 GA
30802 MSVB 12-White 1408 6-6 50% 12 AK
30803 ATHENA VB 13-4 chrome regional 1408 15-23 39% 13 OR
30804 MVVC G 11-Red 1408 23-39 37% 11 CA
30805 Pursuit 10-Premier 1408 6-9 40% 10 MO
30806 TTC 16 Elite 1408 15-15 50% 16 FL
30807 SPORTING EDGE 15-Edge 1408 12-13 48% 15 TX
30808 NPJ Seattle 12-Black 1408 28-46 38% 12 WA
30809 TEMPO 13-White 1408 9-12 43% 13 WI
30810 Corpus Christi Storm 15-Elite impact 1408 15-17 47% 15 TX
30811 Aspire 16-Teal 1408 3-4 43% 16 AZ
30812 Raleigh 18-Royal 1408 20-35 36% 18 NC
30813 East Texas Crush 14-S 1408 0-4 0% 14 TX
30814 So Tx Vollocity 14-1 1408 8-14 35% 14 TX
30815 Summit 14-Um 1408 2-6 25% 14 TX
30816 Low Country 12-Morgan 1408 1-4 20% 12 SC
30817 Southwest Smoke 16-1 1408 6-6 50% 16 KS
30818 Lansing Volleyball Club 16-1 1408 5-8 36% 16 NY
30819 IA VIBE 17-1 nike 1408 6-7 46% 17 IA
30820 NMBVB 15-Chala 1408 4-6 40% 15 FL
30821 Lex United 14-Black 1408 53-80 40% 14 KY
30822 Cape Coast 10-Pluto 1408 6-8 43% 10 FL
30823 Upontop 16-S national pink 1408 20-16 56% 16 FL
30824 Omni 10-Teal 1408 4-8 33% 10 CA
30825 Sanford Fargo 17-Black 1408 15-26 37% 17 MN
30826 SE Grays 16 1408 0-2 0% 16 NE
30827 FVA 13-2 1408 12-20 36% 13 MO
30828 Mem Metro 15-Elite limite 1408 6-9 40% 15 TN
30829 MDJRS 15-Reg black 1408 12-12 44% 15 MD
30830 Rise 16-Yellow 1408 19-26 42% 16 CO
30831 Blue Banner BBV 15-Lucky 1408 13-18 42% 15 CA
30832 MMP 16-1 1408 6-5 55% 16 MO
30833 ENCORE 15-Premier navy 1408 4-5 44% 15 CA
30834 SEIVB 17 Martin 1408 7-9 44% 17 IN
30835 IGNITE 14-White 1408 2-6 25% 14 OH
30836 Ignite 15 XCEL (SC) 1408 15-25 38% 15 CA
30837 Jays 16-White 1408 1-4 13% 16 ND
30838 Sky High 15-Vlachos - spr 1408 9-10 47% 15 IL
30839 Adversity 15 Adversity G151 (GL) 1408 5-7 31% 15 IL
30840 BCS Skyline H 13-Silver 1408 9-11 41% 13 TX
30841 Club North Volleyball KC 16-3 1408 2-4 29% 16 MO
30842 ICE 14-Regional a 1407 3-8 27% 14 WA
30843 PNW Premier 14-S green 1407 17-29 37% 14 WA
30844 CVA 17-Green 1407 21-28 43% 17 CO
30845 757 12-Black 1407 21-25 46% 12 VA
30846 County Volleyball Club 12-1 1407 8-12 40% 12 AL
30847 Wicked Northeast 17-Gold 1407 15-11 58% 17 ME
30848 CinciVB Acad 13-3 1407 11-22 33% 13 OH
30849 South KC Juniors 14-2 1407 2-4 33% 14 KS
30850 Monticello 10 1407 0-3 0% 10 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.