Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 616 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
30751 Southwest Wyoming Volleyball Club 14 SWVC RS14-HARRIS 1408 1-11 8% 14 WY
30752 2025-2026 14-Nexus all stars 1408 0-4 0% 14 NE
30753 LEGACY 13-Premier eddy 1408 12-23 34% 13 FL
30754 Net Force 16-3 orange 1408 10-8 56% 16 IA
30755 Chicago Elite 13-Swoosh 1408 15-16 48% 13 IL
30756 Texas Elite Legends 18-1 1408 14-16 47% 18 TX
30757 LBVC 18-Moe 1408 17-15 53% 18 CA
30758 SDVBC 14-Rebecca 1408 19-19 50% 14 CA
30759 Legacy KY 16-Black 1408 33-47 41% 16 KY
30760 HOVA 17-A blue 1408 16-17 48% 17 OH
30761 Vibe Girls 17-Jocelyn 1408 0-5 0% 17 VT
30762 SCVC 12-Kimball 1408 0-7 0% 12 UT
30763 Rival 14-Silver 1408 0-3 0% 14 NY
30764 NE D-League 13-Black 1408 3-6 33% 13 IA
30765 HPRIME 12-Blue 1408 5-9 36% 12 TX
30766 Hawks VBC 17-1 1408 14-19 42% 17 OH
30767 CI ELITE 14-WHITE 1408 21-28 43% 14 IL
30768 Impact 13-Purple 1408 17-17 50% 13 TX
30769 IA Juniors 18-Black 1408 17-25 40% 18 IA
30770 Princeton 15-White 1408 15-17 47% 15 NJ
30771 HPRIME 11-Pink 1408 0-3 0% 11 TX
30772 Extreme 15-Mark 1408 7-13 35% 15 WA
30773 CJVA 16-Red 1408 9-10 47% 16 NJ
30774 HP 15-Elite white 1408 19-22 46% 15 MI
30775 Chatuge Shores 15-Teal 1408 9-22 29% 15 GA
30776 Ho'ola AC 17-1 1408 9-15 38% 17 HI
30777 NITRO 17-Blue 1408 6-18 25% 17 TX
30778 CPA CdA 13 1408 10-14 42% 13 WA
30779 Sunshine 14-Premier 1408 13-28 32% 14 CA
30780 IMUA 14-Bobby 1408 14-20 41% 14 CA
30781 Full Armour CO 15 1408 0-3 0% 15 CO
30782 FL HYPE 17 Smack 1408 18-23 44% 17 FL
30783 PROJECT SPIKERS 16-3 1408 4-8 29% 16
30784 STARLINGSNVBC 14 1408 1-3 25% 14
30785 Triple G 10:31 18 Triple G 1408 7-6 54% 18 NM
30786 OPU 13-2 1408 17-22 44% 13 FL
30787 Lady Rebels 18-S 1408 1-3 25% 18 MT
30788 UVA 14 1408 12-14 46% 14 LA
30789 Miami Hype 14-Premier1 1408 20-23 47% 14 FL
30790 Wildfire 12-Aau ivana 1408 5-5 50% 12 FL
30791 Northern WI VBC 17-1 1408 17-18 49% 17 WI
30792 Attack VBC 16-S black 1408 21-11 66% 16 MI
30793 Blue Banner BBV 17-Gld 1408 11-13 46% 17 CA
30794 Cap City 14-Reg purple 1408 7-12 29% 14 MT
30795 Texas Lightning 12-Blue 1408 9-15 38% 12 TX
30796 CE New Iberia Lite 12-Scottie 1408 4-6 40% 12 LA
30797 AFVBC 13 Summit 1408 18-30 38% 13 CA
30798 Powerset 12-1 1408 4-6 40% 12 TX
30799 HCV 14-1 1408 14-20 41% 14 IN
30800 LAVA Mission 18-Molten 1408 12-22 35% 18 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.