Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 571 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
28501 Impact VBC 18-1 1429 0-2 0% 18 NY
28502 Surfside 16-Mb legends 1429 24-32 43% 16 CA
28503 RIV 13-Black 1429 2-6 25% 13 WY
28504 Core 13-Elite 1429 19-27 41% 13 CA
28505 LAVA Islands 13 Premier 1429 14-20 41% 13 CA
28506 Iowa PowerPlex 18-Rodrigez 1429 2-3 40% 18 IA
28507 SPRING Mini 407 14-Emairy 1429 1-3 25% 14 FL
28508 TCVBC 17-1 1429 19-18 51% 17 NY
28509 Douglas Dogs 18 Douglas Dogs 1429 1-3 25% 18 AZ
28510 Team One 14-Pearl 1429 11-8 58% 14 IN
28511 CO Vortex VBC 17-Black 1429 14-15 48% 17 CO
28512 SPIKES 12 JumpStart 1429 9-11 45% 12 CO
28513 Chaska Juniors 14-1 1429 18-24 43% 14 MN
28514 TEMPO 16-White 1429 12-12 50% 16 WI
28515 LEGACY 15-State lily 1429 2-2 50% 15 NY
28516 LAVA North 12-Premier 1429 16-16 50% 12 CA
28517 TX Premier 16-Club 1429 17-16 52% 16 TX
28518 TVA Smack 16-Power 1429 7-6 54% 16 CA
28519 Stumptown 16-2 green 1429 14-12 54% 16 OR
28520 PVCGA 13-1 1429 9-5 64% 13 GA
28521 BCVC 16-2 carolina 1429 2-9 18% 16 CA
28522 287 SVC 14-Navy 1429 13-11 46% 14
28523 ANCASTER LIONS VOLLEYBALL CLUB 16 ALVC Invasion 1429 1-4 20% 16
28524 MAVS 12-Holly 1429 0-3 0% 12 KS
28525 KVA Sara 12 1429 0-2 0% 12 TX
28526 307 Impact-Amy 16 1429 1-4 20% 16 WY
28527 GSVY HUSTLE 16-Black 1429 1-3 25% 16 PA
28528 Dynasty 16-10 1429 1-3 25% 16 IN
28529 IC Westside 16 1429 1-3 25% 16 IA
28530 Thunderbolt Volleyball 13 13U Flex 1 Flahan (GW) 1429 1-2 25% 13 MO
28531 HHVBC 16 1429 1-3 25% 16 IA
28532 NE Elite 12-Lightning 1429 2-5 29% 12 NE
28533 Five:1 13-Black 1429 12-28 30% 13 MI
28534 Cape Cod 14-Andy 1429 5-8 31% 14 MA
28535 Coast Volleyball Club 16-6 christian 1429 11-23 32% 16 CA
28536 Cobra 12-Red 1429 6-7 32% 12 MA
28537 Block’d Volleyball Club 17 17 Purple 1429 4-8 33% 17 CA
28538 Air Capital Aces 14-1 1429 4-7 36% 14 KS
28539 Club Z 14-Riley 1429 8-13 38% 14 NM
28540 NC GOLD 16-1 1429 22-35 39% 16 NC
28541 M1 15-White 1429 6-9 40% 15 TN
28542 Vikings 16-Red 1429 2-3 40% 16 MN
28543 Schuylkill Eclipse 15-Solar 1429 2-3 40% 15 PA
28544 ProPlay 14-Bekah 1429 9-13 41% 14 CA
28545 Tsunami 14-1n shadaisha 1429 12-17 41% 14 GA
28546 JET 15 RHOADES 1429 18-24 43% 15 TX
28547 Orion Chargers 12 1429 6-7 43% 12 IA
28548 CentraSota 14-S 1429 4-5 44% 14 MN
28549 ESO 16-Premier 1429 7-9 44% 16 OH
28550 No Panic 12 Pasha 1429 24-27 44% 12 VA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.