Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 570 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
28451 PNW VBC 16-2 green 1430 6-8 43% 16 OR
28452 MoCo Volleyball Club 16 MOCO Mania (CH) 1430 36-30 51% 16
28453 Baseline Volleyball 13 1430 1-3 25% 13 NJ
28454 Raze 18-Power 1430 2-3 40% 18 HI
28455 CTV 18-U 1430 8-6 57% 18 NC
28456 Livingston Peaks 12-2 1430 14-15 44% 12 MT
28457 ESA 13-Yellow 1430 1-4 20% 13 NV
28458 Elevate 13-Black 1430 9-13 41% 13 IL
28459 AAVC 13-Fs 1430 10-10 50% 13 IL
28460 AAVC 13-Kh 1430 8-10 44% 13 IL
28461 Pulse 17-Black 1429 18-30 38% 17 CA
28462 VIPERS 13 PREMIER 1429 9-7 56% 13 FL
28463 SFVC 13-1 1429 8-6 57% 13 FL
28464 Iowa Select Evolution 17-Red 1429 2-3 40% 17 IA
28465 CRVBC 15-2 screech owls 1429 10-14 34% 15 NH
28466 Orono 12-Red 1429 2-3 40% 12 MN
28467 Ignite AZ 15 Inferno 1429 16-34 32% 15 AZ
28468 Rosemont 15-20 1429 13-16 45% 15 FL
28469 SYA 16 Titans 1429 6-10 38% 16 VA
28470 ENVY 17-National 1429 27-37 42% 17 RI
28471 OVA 14-Power erin/lola 1429 4-10 29% 14 CA
28472 SEVA 14-Navy laila 1429 6-9 40% 14 NC
28473 Jaguars 13-Black 1429 13-15 36% 13 NY
28474 Limitless Queens LQVC 13-1 1429 3-4 43% 13 NV
28475 Palm Beach Jrs 11-1 1429 7-6 54% 11 FL
28476 NSDVB 15 1429 15-14 52% 15 CA
28477 FSJ 11-2 regional 1429 13-18 41% 11 AR
28478 Center Stars 15 1429 2-3 40% 15 WI
28479 Black Swamp 16-2 1429 13-19 41% 16 OH
28480 WF Elite 18-White 1429 2-13 13% 18 TX
28481 Las Monarcas Volleyball Club 14 Monarcas Volleyball Hugo 1429 1-4 20% 14 PR
28482 Club 217 18-Ashton 1429 6-9 40% 18 IL
28483 Legacy 18-Faith 1429 22-22 49% 18 SC
28484 Heroes 13-Raider 1429 10-13 42% 13 TX
28485 SWI3D 12-White 1429 1-3 25% 12 NE
28486 806 Volleyball Taylor 10-S 1429 3-5 38% 10 TX
28487 SoDak Juniors 13 Elite 1429 13-16 45% 13 MN
28488 Five:1 17-Blue 1429 22-24 48% 17 MI
28489 JM 12-Grey 1429 0-1 0% 12 TX
28490 VCN Lincoln 17-Navy 1429 4-10 29% 17 NE
28491 Chi City 17-1 regional 1429 9-9 43% 17 IL
28492 Highland County Volleyball Club 14 14 Dickey (OV) 1429 4-7 36% 14 OH
28493 Adira 18-Rhodes 1429 15-20 43% 18 TN
28494 305VBC 12-Rs rafael 1429 2-2 50% 12 FL
28495 Houston Stars 15-1 1429 1-6 14% 15 TX
28496 HOU STARS 15-Black 1429 6-9 40% 15 TX
28497 MJVA 13-3 1429 3-4 43% 13 GA
28498 Static Volleyball Club G14-3 1429 2-3 40% 14 MO
28499 Top Flight 12-Kappa 1429 2-4 33% 12 IL
28500 BVA 17 Helen 1429 17-16 52% 17 NC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.