Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 558 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
27851 Momentum 15-2 1435 2-3 40% 15 IN
27852 Big Cat 12-Black 1435 2-3 40% 12 IA
27853 TuoCo Elite 14 1435 10-16 38% 14 CA
27854 Cap City 12-State purple 1435 5-13 24% 12 MT
27855 Alliance 12 Regional 1435 7-11 37% 12 TN
27856 Sidewinder 17-1 1435 31-26 54% 17 AZ
27857 Inferno 14 Heat 1435 28-20 56% 14 IL
27858 PREVAIL Girls 17-Pink 1435 1-4 20% 17 NJ
27859 PV 14-Select north 1435 13-13 50% 14 MA
27860 CI Spikers 17-1 1435 12-22 35% 17 MN
27861 T4VBC 11-White 1435 0-2 0% 11 TX
27862 S.A. STARS 16U NAVY 1435 14-15 45% 16 TX
27863 PJVC 11-Black 1435 0-2 0% 11 TX
27864 Level Up 12-1 1435 2-2 40% 12 MI
27865 Fresno Heat HEAT 16-National khanh 1435 1-6 14% 16 NV
27866 Accuracy 16-Pro 1435 12-23 34% 16 NJ
27867 Maine Jrs 16-Bronze 1435 14-10 58% 16 ME
27868 TNT 17-Sapphire 1435 2-4 33% 17 MA
27869 417 MoJrs 13-Reg black 1435 7-10 41% 13 MO
27870 MARIN 16-Fire 1435 25-36 41% 16 CA
27871 Red Rock 15-Halsey - walnut creek 1435 17-24 41% 15 CA
27872 NOVA Juniors 13-S navy 1435 17-24 41% 13 OH
27873 Bears VC 12 1435 3-4 43% 12 PR
27874 Team Xtreme 15 1435 3-4 43% 15 NV
27875 Summit 14-Orange elite 1435 17-23 43% 14 IN
27876 Team Colorado 16-N1 1435 23-30 43% 16 CO
27877 SEVA 15-Navy caelyn 1435 10-13 43% 15 NC
27878 Slam VBC 17-2 1435 5-5 50% 17 WI
27879 Monsters 15-White 1435 18-12 60% 15 MI
27880 LS Thunder 14-Black 1435 4-7 31% 14
27881 Blocskport 12-Red 1435 2-3 40% 12
27882 TxINV 13-Cp 1435 5-4 56% 13
27883 Architects 12-Black 1435 4-9 31% 12
27884 Image 15-Red 1435 8-20 27% 15
27885 Ohana V 15-Blue 1435 3-7 27% 15
27886 SC 17 1435 1-3 25% 17
27887 DV ROYALS - NAVY 15-Girls 1435 2-6 25% 15
27888 Black Rose 17-Black 1434 8-7 53% 17 PA
27889 EVCNC 15-Blue 1434 6-9 40% 15 NC
27890 WTMavs 15 1434 1-2 20% 15
27891 SVC 17-Black 1434 7-9 44% 17 MO
27892 Club Legacy 15-Bravo 1434 5-15 25% 15 NE
27893 SKEVA 18-Blue 1434 15-28 35% 18 KY
27894 Low Country 12-Pink 1434 5-4 56% 12 SC
27895 Warren Sixpack 17-Black 1434 22-23 49% 17 NJ
27896 SG Elite 13 Lightning 1434 15-12 56% 13 CA
27897 UVA 13-Club 1434 0-2 0% 13 CA
27898 SPVC 13-Girls khloe 1434 2-3 40% 13 CA
27899 BRUSA 13-2 mauro 1434 3-7 30% 13 CA
27900 Blue Crab 16-Red 1434 19-29 39% 16 LA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.