2025-2026 Season — Page 557 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27801 | SynergyForce 15-Silver | 1435 | 19-29 | 40% | 15 | CA |
| 27802 | District VBC 15 GOLD | 1435 | 16-18 | 47% | 15 | CA |
| 27803 | Pu'ukī VBC 16-90 | 1435 | 4-4 | 50% | 16 | HI |
| 27804 | Fusion Volleyball Club - Minnesota 18-Jen | 1435 | 2-3 | 40% | 18 | MN |
| 27805 | KPV 16-Pink-carlee | 1435 | 24-26 | 48% | 16 | KY |
| 27806 | OC Lady Elite 17-Pink | 1435 | 26-25 | 51% | 17 | NY |
| 27807 | IEV 13-U blue | 1435 | 17-17 | 50% | 13 | FL |
| 27808 | SKC 14-Blue | 1435 | 1-4 | 20% | 14 | KS |
| 27809 | Air Strike 18 AirStrike Kelsey | 1435 | 0-5 | 0% | 18 | MI |
| 27810 | Blue Heat 11 | 1435 | 7-7 | 47% | 11 | MO |
| 27811 | NE Velo 16-3s | 1435 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | MN |
| 27812 | Chicago Red Stars 16 Red Stars Skyline | 1435 | 33-24 | 57% | 16 | IL |
| 27813 | CinciVB Acad 12-1 | 1435 | 8-26 | 24% | 12 | OH |
| 27814 | CVC 15-Red | 1435 | 5-9 | 36% | 15 | OH |
| 27815 | CID 17-Blue | 1435 | 9-11 | 45% | 17 | ID |
| 27816 | Loudoun Elite Volleyball Club 12-Cienna | 1435 | 28-34 | 45% | 12 | VA |
| 27817 | CVVC 14-Holli | 1435 | 6-4 | 46% | 14 | UT |
| 27818 | Kansas United 14-1 | 1435 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | KS |
| 27819 | Mojo 14-R | 1435 | 4-5 | 44% | 14 | OH |
| 27820 | Beach South 16-2 | 1435 | 5-4 | 56% | 16 | GA |
| 27821 | RIV 17-Black | 1435 | 1-3 | 25% | 17 | WY |
| 27822 | G3VB 14-2 | 1435 | 20-30 | 40% | 14 | OR |
| 27823 | Sun City Flames Ignite 18 | 1435 | 15-26 | 37% | 18 | TX |
| 27824 | Hollywood Heat 13-3 | 1435 | 1-3 | 25% | 13 | OH |
| 27825 | Premier PEAK 18 | 1435 | 20-42 | 32% | 18 | DE |
| 27826 | Colibris VBC 17-Velvet | 1435 | 14-10 | 58% | 17 | CO |
| 27827 | SSPVBC 12-Maroon | 1435 | 4-6 | 40% | 12 | MN |
| 27828 | Central Kansas Rampage 16-1 | 1435 | 7-6 | 54% | 16 | KS |
| 27829 | The Lab 11 | 1435 | 1-2 | 20% | 11 | IA |
| 27830 | ATOMIC 14-Energy 2 | 1435 | 23-20 | 53% | 14 | AZ |
| 27831 | Wasatch Volleyball Club 15 WVC Abbie | 1435 | 7-8 | 44% | 15 | UT |
| 27832 | HC FLOW 13-Lava | 1435 | 13-13 | 48% | 13 | TX |
| 27833 | Carolina ICE 12-Nat | 1435 | 12-21 | 36% | 12 | SC |
| 27834 | SynergyForce 13 Gold | 1435 | 16-32 | 33% | 13 | CA |
| 27835 | Wawasee 12-Green | 1435 | 1-4 | 20% | 12 | IN |
| 27836 | Utah Ice Volleyball Club 17 Utah Ice Keysha | 1435 | 0-2 | 0% | 17 | UT |
| 27837 | 513VB 10-1 | 1435 | 1-3 | 25% | 10 | OH |
| 27838 | LevelUp 13-Red | 1435 | 12-14 | 46% | 13 | MI |
| 27839 | AZ STRIKE 16-1 | 1435 | 1-6 | 14% | 16 | NV |
| 27840 | Net Force 13-4 black | 1435 | 11-19 | 33% | 13 | IA |
| 27841 | BAVA 11 Bolts | 1435 | 12-17 | 32% | 11 | MD |
| 27842 | Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 11-National | 1435 | 7-7 | 50% | 11 | NJ |
| 27843 | Big Sky 12-3 | 1435 | 15-18 | 39% | 12 | MT |
| 27844 | Mission 14-Jdi | 1435 | 19-19 | 50% | 14 | IL |
| 27845 | Surfside 14-Pv legends | 1435 | 19-20 | 49% | 14 | CA |
| 27846 | VISION VOLLEYBALL 18-1 kortney/courtney | 1435 | 23-12 | 66% | 18 | GA |
| 27847 | New Prague JO 14-Red | 1435 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | MN |
| 27848 | IMUA 14-Janesa | 1435 | 7-6 | 54% | 14 | CA |
| 27849 | Club Focus 16 FOCUS GRIESE | 1435 | 11-13 | 46% | 16 | OH |
| 27850 | ForceVC 16-4 | 1435 | 19-19 | 50% | 16 | OH |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.