Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 555 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
27701 SynergyForce 14-Red 1436 13-15 46% 14 CA
27702 Club GSL 13-Elite - aubrey 1436 12-24 29% 13 UT
27703 Monterey Bay 14 1436 10-6 63% 14 CA
27704 1 Flight 12-2 regional 1436 10-9 50% 12 OR
27705 CAVA 12 1436 7-9 44% 12 IN
27706 Networks Academy 12 Jayde (SO) 1436 1-2 25% 12 AL
27707 FVBC 13-Regional red 1436 17-14 47% 13 MD
27708 Carolina Pro Perfomance 10 1436 1-2 33% 10 PR
27709 ClubOne 13 Gold 1436 19-18 51% 13 CO
27710 Coalition 13-1 1436 14-15 48% 13 CO
27711 Topeka Fury Volleyball Club 13-1 1436 12-10 52% 13 KS
27712 Diablos 12 16 Diablo s 1436 2-5 29% 16 NV
27713 Powerset 16-1 1436 12-12 46% 16 TX
27714 Mana Toa 17-2 1436 2-2 50% 17 AL
27715 NC Elite 14-Red 1436 7-7 50% 14 NC
27716 HRVC 14-American white 1436 10-13 43% 14 NC
27717 Alpha Omega Volleyball 15-2 1436 5-8 29% 15 MO
27718 FEVA 17-Alexis 1436 29-36 45% 17 FL
27719 MoCo MAVS 12-White 1436 10-12 45% 12 TX
27720 Iowa United 11-1 regional 1436 3-4 30% 11 IA
27721 Mineral Area 11-Alphas red 1436 9-11 45% 11 MO
27722 Boston United 15-Indigo 1436 1-2 33% 15 MA
27723 RCVC 18 1436 7-8 47% 18 NC
27724 Boiler Jrs 14-1mi iron 1436 1-3 25% 14 IN
27725 BVCAL 16-Hayden 1436 1-2 25% 16 AL
27726 Independent 14-Roberts 1436 1-3 25% 14 IN
27727 PEPVB 16-Black 1436 13-12 52% 16 GA
27728 417 Juniors 14-4 1436 2-3 33% 14 MO
27729 Jax Pursuit 14 1436 3-9 25% 14 FL
27730 S.A. STARS 13-Navy 1436 9-9 50% 13 TX
27731 Youngers 13 1436 12-17 41% 13 TX
27732 TPV 16-Red 1436 23-21 52% 16 TN
27733 Tsunami 16-2n hailey 1436 15-16 48% 16 GA
27734 Performance Volleyball 15-1 1436 2-5 20% 15
27735 MORGAN HILL 13-Black 1436 1-3 25% 13 CA
27736 Oasis 13 Select 1436 21-23 48% 13 CA
27737 Delano Storm VC 13 DSVC-13U 1436 8-6 57% 13 CA
27738 I AM VBC 16-White 1436 27-20 57% 16 WI
27739 C1VB 14-Regional easley 1436 17-16 52% 14 SC
27740 Carolina ICE 14-Semi nat 1436 18-18 50% 14 SC
27741 AR SELECT 15-Ntl 1436 19-21 46% 15 AR
27742 SJVBC Girls 18-Elite 1436 8-12 40% 18 NJ
27743 Thunder 14-S 1436 6-5 55% 14 MN
27744 Freeze 14-Blue 1436 13-14 48% 14 MN
27745 Ohana 16-Crush 1436 2-2 50% 16 FL
27746 Dime 12-Surf 1436 17-12 59% 12 CA
27747 Tstreet 15-Sam l 1436 15-19 44% 15 CA
27748 Sand Santa Cruz 15-Luccionna 1436 16-20 44% 15 CA
27749 SADDLEBACK 15-Ryan 1436 17-16 52% 15 CA
27750 Sunshine 15 Elite 1436 21-39 35% 15 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.