Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 554 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
27651 Corpus Christi Storm 16 Elite 1437 16-18 46% 16 TX
27652 Lincoln Vipers 17-1s 1437 1-3 25% 17 NE
27653 DSVC 12-Power red 1437 9-13 41% 12 AL
27654 TX TFV 13 TomCat 1437 8-11 42% 13 TX
27655 FL HYPE 14 Navy 1437 22-24 48% 14 FL
27656 AP 18 Baden 1437 14-23 38% 18 TX
27657 GSJ 16 MB 1437 21-25 46% 16 SC
27658 Alexander Aces 15U 1437 1-3 25% 15 NC
27659 Lakeside 16 Lakeside Inkemba 1437 2-3 40% 16 NY
27660 GSL 14-Sport kristen 1437 1-6 14% 14 UT
27661 MVC Elite 12-2 1437 10-11 45% 12 AR
27662 EliteVBTC 16-Pink 1437 14-17 45% 16 OH
27663 Hawaiian Style 16-Red 1437 13-16 45% 16 HI
27664 Beach Cities 12-Diamond 1437 7-9 44% 12 CA
27665 Vision 15-Regional red 1437 11-11 44% 15 TX
27666 Tsunami 14-1n jaida 1437 12-15 44% 14 GA
27667 Spire VC 12-Leah 1437 6-8 43% 12 OH
27668 Tribe 13-Collins 1437 6-8 43% 13 OH
27669 Calgary Spartans 17-1 1437 4-5 44% 17 AB
27670 Saber 11 1437 2-5 22% 11 IA
27671 OneWay Volleyball Club 12 OneWay Storm 1437 1-4 20% 12 NM
27672 WPVBC 17 1437 2-3 40% 17 NJ
27673 Kaizen Girls 16-Black 1437 18-28 39% 16 OK
27674 Coastal VBC 18-Grey 1437 9-13 39% 18 DE
27675 Black Hills Juniors 12-Gold 1436 0-4 0% 12 WY
27676 SLAM 15-Purple 1436 18-25 36% 15 TX
27677 Rolling Thunder 12-Blue 1436 15-24 38% 12 IL
27678 Rogue 14-National 1436 24-36 40% 14 OH
27679 Five Starz 16-Black tristan 1436 17-25 40% 16 CA
27680 SHVBC 16-1 black 1436 10-15 40% 16 OR
27681 Club 1 SS 14-Red 1436 1-2 33% 14 IL
27682 ARSEL 13-3 1436 8-4 67% 13 PR
27683 NASA 15-White fox 1436 15-16 48% 15 AL
27684 City 15 Silver 1436 19-33 37% 15 CA
27685 VC United 15-2 premier 1436 6-11 35% 15 IL
27686 PacWest 17-Troy 1436 16-23 41% 17 CA
27687 OptimalVBC 13-1 1436 16-13 52% 13 GA
27688 Apex 12 Dragons 1436 8-8 47% 12 IL
27689 AP 15-Neon 1436 21-25 46% 15 TX
27690 Fr Challenge Elite 15-Roy 1436 25-28 43% 15 TX
27691 Blast Volleyball Club 17 18U Blast Red 1436 3-7 30% 17 PA
27692 Encantadoras de Anasco 15 1436 5-6 45% 15 FL
27693 Hunter's 10-White 1436 4-3 57% 10 FL
27694 Roanoke United 15-White 1436 14-14 50% 15 VA
27695 Johnston 12-Regional 1436 5-9 36% 12 IA
27696 SERV 17 Impact 1436 32-23 58% 17 VA
27697 Wildfire 18-N premier 1436 2-13 13% 18 FL
27698 Lethbridge Volleyball Club 15-Girls - blue 1436 2-5 29% 15 WA
27699 MiElite 15-Ns north 1436 16-20 44% 15 MI
27700 MiElite 15-Gabby east 1436 9-11 41% 15 MI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.