Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 526 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
26251 Iowa Select 16-Reid 1450 16-19 42% 16 IA
26252 WAVE 16 Seahorses 1450 20-18 53% 16 IN
26253 SISU VB 16-1 1450 9-26 26% 16 MA
26254 Cape Cod 16-Shannon 1450 10-8 43% 16 MA
26255 MiElite 16-Sapphire east 1450 16-10 62% 16 MI
26256 RAJO 16-S 1450 6-7 40% 16 MN
26257 CI Spikers 16-1 1450 12-17 41% 16 MN
26258 Laurel Express 16-1 1450 12-20 32% 16 MT
26259 FVC 16-2 1450 15-13 39% 16 MT
26260 Val Verde Victory 16-1 velocity 1450 15-9 56% 16 TX
26261 COLA 17-Blue 1450 16-26 38% 17 CA
26262 RVC 17-Relentless 1450 34-38 47% 17 CO
26263 Metro 17-Blue 1450 16-15 52% 17 GA
26264 Ohana 17-R 1450 0-2 0% 17 IA
26265 Top Flight 17 Theta 1450 26-29 47% 17 IL
26266 Shock 17-Ua spark 1450 21-26 45% 17 IL
26267 ACEEV 17-Black 1450 1-2 25% 17 NY
26268 Millennium 17-Albert 1450 15-17 47% 17 OH
26269 Masters Volleyball Academy- Carolina's 17-1 1450 35-33 51% 17 SC
26270 KKVC 17-Sc - orange 1450 1-3 25% 17 SD
26271 TIV 17-National 1450 4-3 57% 17 TX
26272 Medford Storm 17-1 1450 1-3 25% 17 WI
26273 Be Elite 18 1450 14-11 56% 18 AR
26274 TA'AHINE VBC - HI 18-S 1450 12-9 57% 18 HI
26275 FOG Red 18 1450 2-6 25% 18 HI
26276 Fierce Elite 18-Maroon 1450 4-1 80% 18 IL
26277 TC ELITE 18 1450 6-5 55% 18 LA
26278 Wild 18 1450 2-2 50% 18 ND
26279 S.A. STARS 18U GOLD 1450 26-19 57% 18 TX
26280 NPJ Seattle 18-Premier 1450 35-24 58% 18 WA
26281 TC ELITE 14 LEXI 1449 7-7 47% 14 LA
26282 Brownsville Dynamite 14-1 1449 10-14 42% 14 TX
26283 Vegas United G15-White 1449 16-28 36% 15 NV
26284 Wrecking Crew 14-3 1449 1-3 20% 14 TX
26285 EPVC 13-1 1449 2-3 40% 13 OH
26286 K2 11 Ultras 1449 16-15 52% 11 TN
26287 Starlings West Tucson 14-Blue 1449 20-17 54% 14 AZ
26288 Adversity 14-Blk adidas 1449 6-8 43% 14 IL
26289 All In 14-Purple 1449 2-3 40% 14 IL
26290 New WAVE 14-Storm 1449 16-15 52% 14 IL
26291 VISION VOLLEYBALL 13-1 tom 1449 22-17 56% 13 GA
26292 PVA 10-1 1449 3-2 50% 10 MO
26293 PNW VBC 16-1 black 1449 18-19 49% 16 OR
26294 LAVA Islands 15 Premier 1449 16-19 46% 15 CA
26295 Stingray Black 17-1 1449 13-14 48% 17 CA
26296 SynergyForce 11 Gold 1449 15-32 32% 11 CA
26297 Greater Cincinnati Volleyball Club 13 13-Frazier/Abbinante 1449 11-13 46% 13 OH
26298 Pipeline 15-Boost chanda 1449 19-22 46% 15 CA
26299 YQL Selects 14-1 1449 0-3 0% 14 CA
26300 PV 12-Regional south 1449 6-7 38% 12 MA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.