Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 525 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
26201 USA South 13-Premier black 1450 21-21 50% 13 FL
26202 Iowa Matrix 13-Dynamis 1450 1-3 25% 13 IA
26203 360SA 13 Sapphires 1450 17-17 49% 13 IL
26204 Momentum 13-3 1450 2-3 40% 13 IN
26205 KC Power 13-4 1450 3-4 43% 13 KS
26206 Cajun Elite 13-S hannah m 1450 2-3 40% 13 LA
26207 Annapolis 13-1 1450 10-13 37% 13 MD
26208 Watertown 13-Red 1450 1-3 25% 13 MN
26209 417 MoJrs 13-Reg royal 1450 4-5 44% 13 MO
26210 ECJVC 13-Select 1450 12-10 55% 13 NC
26211 BBV 13-Sofia 1450 2-6 25% 13 NV
26212 VolleyFX 13 Trick 1450 15-15 44% 13 NY
26213 Club V 13-Papa wayne 1450 14-16 37% 13 UT
26214 AR SELECT 14-Reg+ 1450 26-19 55% 14 AR
26215 Blue Angels 14-U2 white 1450 2-5 29% 14 CA
26216 North Fork 14-Red 1450 1-2 33% 14 CO
26217 Hunter's 14-Red c. yoly 1450 1-2 33% 14 FL
26218 PHOENIX 14-Suns 1450 35-23 60% 14 FL
26219 COLAVOL 14 Carolina 1450 13-10 54% 14 GA
26220 XP 14-Elite 2 1450 21-25 46% 14 IL
26221 Rapid Fire 14-Red 1450 12-10 55% 14 IL
26222 Central Kansas Rampage 14-2 1450 3-4 43% 14 KS
26223 MiElite 14-Ag west 1450 13-8 54% 14 MI
26224 SW Power 14-1 1450 1-2 25% 14 MN
26225 NC 14-2 1450 3-4 43% 14 ND
26226 Downstate 14-Pythons 1450 15-14 52% 14 NY
26227 HRV 14-2 1450 9-11 45% 14 OR
26228 ATHENA VB 14-7 pink regional 1450 20-18 53% 14 OR
26229 APEX 14-Avalanche orange 1450 12-14 46% 14 PA
26230 MWVC 14-Barcelo 1450 2-4 33% 14 PR
26231 CSNS 14 1450 12-13 48% 14 SC
26232 VCV 14-Red 1450 2-3 40% 14 SD
26233 TAV Houston 14-Silver 1450 13-16 45% 14 TX
26234 Xcel VB 14-2 navy 1450 13-18 41% 14 TX
26235 Rize 14-Cortney 1450 1-2 33% 14 UT
26236 Panhandle Powerhouse 14-Black 1450 5-4 56% 14 WY
26237 The HBC 15-Black 1450 23-22 51% 15 CA
26238 Sunshine 15 Extreme 1450 19-35 35% 15 CA
26239 Xtreme 15-Black 1450 12-12 50% 15 CO
26240 EU 15-Platinum 1450 23-32 42% 15 IN
26241 O3 15-Blue 1450 31-15 65% 15 MI
26242 WVC 15-1 1450 13-14 48% 15 MN
26243 Core STL 15-Carolina 1450 17-26 39% 15 MO
26244 JVBC 15-S 1450 13-13 48% 15 NJ
26245 MHAC 15-Black 1450 18-29 38% 15 OR
26246 1W 15 Onyx 1450 9-14 39% 15 WI
26247 Granada Hills 16-Royal 1450 4-3 57% 16 CA
26248 Golden State 16-Teal 1450 3-4 43% 16 CA
26249 MVA 16-Duane 1450 28-24 54% 16 FL
26250 AVBC 16-Lily 1450 25-15 63% 16 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.