Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 473 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
23601 SEV 12-1 1473 2-3 40% 12 OH
23602 Kenai 14-V 1473 6-4 60% 14 AK
23603 Garrett United 13-1 1473 11-10 52% 13 OH
23604 Iowa Impact 14-2 1473 1-4 20% 14 IA
23605 HI Bred 14-Pink 1473 15-8 58% 14 HI
23606 SOSVBC 13-T cass 1473 5-7 42% 13 NY
23607 Durham Attack VBC 17 Durham Attack Velocity 1473 3-4 43% 17 PA
23608 SMASH 15-Black elite 1473 13-13 50% 15 MO
23609 Mineral Area 15 Mayhem 1473 8-5 53% 15 MO
23610 SDVBC 16-Hannah 1473 31-21 60% 16 CA
23611 The HBC 16-Black 1473 17-27 39% 16 CA
23612 HD Starlings 16-1 1473 16-19 46% 16 CA
23613 London Elite 10-Blue 1473 3-3 50% 10 OH
23614 Iowa Alliance 14-Black 1473 2-3 40% 14 IA
23615 GCVA 14-1 coast 1473 10-15 36% 14 TX
23616 Titan Valley 14-Spartans 1473 3-3 43% 14 PA
23617 JET 14 BUNDY 1473 11-16 41% 14 TX
23618 SSVA 14-Black 1473 9-8 53% 14 PA
23619 Seymour VC 13 1473 10-11 48% 13 IN
23620 OVVC 15-Silver 1473 4-5 44% 15 OH
23621 Red Rock 12-Christian - redwood city 1473 7-9 44% 12 CA
23622 Flashes 12-1 1473 10-10 50% 12 CA
23623 Oasis 18-National 1473 24-23 51% 18 CA
23624 Hus-kee VC 12-Blue 1473 2-4 33% 12 MN
23625 twin tiers volleyball club 14 Aces (XL) 1473 4-6 33% 14 NY
23626 Monterey Bay 18 1473 6-8 43% 18 CA
23627 Riptide Volleyball Club 18 Riptide - Haleigh 1473 4-3 57% 18 CA
23628 Vegas Volley 17-1 1473 3-2 60% 17 NV
23629 HOP Rebels 12-Crimson 1473 8-10 44% 12 WA
23630 Stumptown 18-1 blue 1473 12-13 46% 18 OR
23631 Saratoga 15-White 1473 27-26 49% 15 NY
23632 BAVC 17-Regional ale 1473 17-11 61% 17 CA
23633 ECVBA 17-1 1473 22-22 50% 17 CA
23634 Lancers 15 1473 2-5 22% 15 IA
23635 GENESIS 15 1473 6-6 46% 15 IA
23636 OK Charge South 15-1 1473 21-18 54% 15 OK
23637 EVA 16 Navy 1473 17-16 52% 16 AR
23638 Sky High Adidas 15-White 1473 26-28 48% 15 IL
23639 South County 16-Gold 1473 20-22 48% 16 RI
23640 Chi City 15-1 regional 1473 7-11 33% 15 IL
23641 LRJ 16-Premier blue 1473 27-24 53% 16 AR
23642 NOWVBC 14-2 1473 4-3 57% 14 HI
23643 Sky High Adidas 11-Elite 1473 15-17 47% 11 IL
23644 FIELDHOUSE VBC 17-Ikaika ray 1473 2-5 29% 17 TX
23645 MAVA 11-Blue 1473 0-1 0% 11 MN
23646 AVA TX 17 Attack 1473 31-28 53% 17 TX
23647 Great Plains 13-Blue 1473 2-3 40% 13 NE
23648 WC 13-3 1473 7-7 50% 13 FL
23649 BVCAL 13-Gretchen 1473 3-2 60% 13 AL
23650 BVC 13 Gretchen 1473 11-11 50% 13 AL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.