Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 472 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
23551 OCR 18-Gold 1474 11-12 48% 18 CA
23552 MARIN 18-Green 1474 25-22 53% 18 CA
23553 DVVC 18-1 1474 5-16 24% 18 CA
23554 FVC 16-Intensity 1474 1-2 25% 16 NE
23555 XFactor VBC-18 17 XFactor VBC-USAV 1474 6-5 55% 17 NV
23556 Holy Trinity Cruisers 17 1474 4-6 33% 17 IA
23557 Iowa Vibe 15-2 1474 1-3 20% 15 IA
23558 Heat 18-Flame 1474 18-15 55% 18 WI
23559 Ohana 13-National 1474 16-19 46% 13 IA
23560 MHVBC 17-1 1474 4-3 57% 17 CA
23561 JEV 16-1 1474 15-13 54% 16 ID
23562 Delano 10-Orange 1474 1-3 20% 10 MN
23563 DYNASTY 15-Gold 1474 14-35 29% 15 KS
23564 Manhattan Mayhem 15-1 1474 7-5 54% 15 KS
23565 Endless 16-Navy williams 1474 6-15 24% 16 TX
23566 Flyers 13-Reg-nichole 1474 16-16 48% 13 TX
23567 FSJ 16-National 1474 14-12 54% 16 AR
23568 Omni 15-N3 1474 36-28 56% 15 AZ
23569 Push 1 18-S - linnie 1474 3-2 60% 18 GA
23570 Normal Flight 14-2 1474 9-10 47% 14 IL
23571 Thunder 13-Navy 1474 8-7 53% 13 MO
23572 CPVB 15-National 1474 12-18 36% 15 CT
23573 Bemidji 12-Nicole 1474 2-2 40% 12 ND
23574 WMass 16-1 nala 1474 5-5 50% 16 MA
23575 TX Legends 18-Blue 1474 3-2 38% 18 TX
23576 NPJO Volleyball 16-Black 1474 6-6 50% 16 MN
23577 Allegro 15-Amazing 1474 35-41 46% 15 NJ
23578 PVA 16-Gray 1474 8-10 44% 16 MO
23579 clubSAV 13-Local white 1474 7-6 54% 13 GA
23580 Dominicos PR 12-Gascot 1474 2-3 40% 12 FL
23581 NC Power & Sand 16-Girls 1474 3-3 50% 16 NC
23582 A5 Regional 13-3 1474 4-2 67% 13 GA
23583 DFW Elite 18-S nationals 1474 3-4 43% 18 TX
23584 KLUB 14 1473 17-11 61% 14 NV
23585 Evolve 15-Red 1473 15-22 41% 15 CA
23586 LAVA North 15 Elite 1473 15-19 44% 15 CA
23587 Temecula Viper 15-2 marlee/ashlyn 1473 22-31 42% 15 CA
23588 Legacy 18-3 adidas 1473 22-24 48% 18 MI
23589 Fusion 14-Trina 1473 9-8 45% 14 UT
23590 CJVA 14-Diamond 1473 16-15 52% 14 NJ
23591 Essex 14-1 1473 11-9 55% 14 NJ
23592 VIRAGO 16 National 1473 21-22 49% 16 OK
23593 Networks Acad 12-3 1473 3-3 33% 12 AL
23594 Spire VC 17-Burke 1473 10-10 50% 17 OH
23595 Prolink 13-Madi 1473 36-31 54% 13 GA
23596 AR SELECT 12-Reg+ navy 1473 17-17 50% 12 AR
23597 FB Xpress 14-Black 1473 10-9 50% 14 TX
23598 Wisconsin Elite 16-Red 1473 29-37 44% 16 WI
23599 SBVC Girls 16 Elite 1473 21-13 62% 16 CA
23600 Adversity-WI 16-1 1473 34-23 60% 16 WI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.