Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 453 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
22601 Monon 14-2mi comets 1482 11-10 52% 14 IN
22602 EVRC 14-Reese 1482 12-10 55% 14 IN
22603 SJVC 12-1 1482 3-6 33% 12 FL
22604 ARAA 11-Ydt black 1482 1-1 50% 11 MN
22605 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 13-4 1482 2-2 40% 13 KS
22606 Victory 18-National black 1482 8-25 22% 18 TX
22607 JVB 12 Maroon 1482 6-10 38% 12 MN
22608 Chaska Juniors 12-1 1482 19-23 44% 12 MN
22609 Mesa Juniors 14-Teal 1482 2-3 29% 14 CO
22610 Momentum Volleyball 17-Tara/david 1482 16-23 41% 17 CO
22611 EnERgy 12-2 1482 1-1 50% 12 MN
22612 Vikings 14-Red 1482 6-10 38% 14 MN
22613 Tsunami 15-2e anna 1482 34-34 50% 15 GA
22614 SVBC Spirit 14-Navy 1482 3-2 60% 14 IA
22615 Xtreme 17-National kyli 1482 17-13 57% 17 NJ
22616 Conquest 17-Tin 1482 10-14 38% 17 NJ
22617 Grayhound GVC 15 1482 3-2 60% 15 IA
22618 Club MVP 15-1 1482 9-13 31% 15 MO
22619 ENCORE 12-Nadia/ariel 1482 4-4 50% 12 CA
22620 Eclipse 14-1 1482 29-19 60% 14 WA
22621 Katy United 13-Fathom 1482 17-18 49% 13 TX
22622 MVP 15-Green 1482 3-1 75% 15 OH
22623 NPSC United Panthers 12 1482 3-5 30% 12 VA
22624 BRUSA 16 Camille 1482 18-23 44% 16 CA
22625 360 16-Kaos white sutton 1482 16-19 39% 16 NV
22626 Cincy Crush 10-1 1482 2-3 40% 10 OH
22627 SG Elite 17-Excel 1482 21-23 48% 17 CA
22628 Point Break VBC 17-Mike 1482 17-16 52% 17 CA
22629 BRUSA 17-Fiapo 1482 20-19 51% 17 CA
22630 PR Arsenal 17-Josean 1482 2-3 40% 17 PR
22631 Adira 16-Baker 1482 17-16 50% 16 TN
22632 TTVC 13 1482 5-6 45% 13 NY
22633 CVA 18-Navy 1482 22-28 44% 18 CO
22634 Bandits Volleyball Club 14-Emily 1482 4-4 50% 14 AL
22635 FIEL 15 1482 5-3 63% 15 MX
22636 414 16-Blue 1482 19-18 51% 16 WI
22637 SVBC Spirit 18-Elite 1482 2-3 40% 18 IA
22638 Miami Hype 15-Power3 1482 43-32 57% 15 FL
22639 New WAVE 16 Hurricane 1482 22-21 51% 16 IL
22640 NorthEast Volleyball Club 18 NorthEast Volleyball Club 1482 5-4 45% 18 CT
22641 Layne Volleyball 13-Pink 1482 6-5 55% 13 OH
22642 Tuba City VBC 12-1 1482 22-19 54% 12 AZ
22643 Elevate VA 13-1 1482 4-3 57% 13 VA
22644 Miami Hype 16-Power2 1482 45-36 56% 16 FL
22645 STX Digz 14-Dynasty 14s 1482 10-5 67% 14 TX
22646 RVC 15-White 1482 42-49 44% 15 KY
22647 SAJO 13-1 1482 16-21 43% 13 MN
22648 Prospects VBA 10-Select 1482 1-1 50% 10 IL
22649 TFVC 18-1 1482 23-20 53% 18 TN
22650 Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 16-T rachael 1482 12-15 44% 16 NJ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.