Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 452 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
22551 MADFROG 16-East diamond 1482 3-5 38% 16 TX
22552 AAVC 15-Black 1482 15-12 56% 15 CA
22553 Kids America 16-Peterson 1482 2-2 50% 16 OH
22554 RISE 712 11-1 1482 7-10 41% 11 IA
22555 Hammerhead 17-2 1482 12-12 50% 17 MN
22556 CHAVC 14-Purple 1482 19-31 38% 14 NC
22557 Cruisers 17-S 1482 1-3 20% 17 IA
22558 Mavericks Volleyball 18 18U MAVERICKS 1482 17-14 55% 18 LA
22559 PIRATAS ADN 13-2 1482 3-2 60% 13 PR
22560 Club Solano 14-Black 1482 14-22 39% 14 CA
22561 Desert Elite 14-1 1482 3-4 43% 14 CA
22562 SADDLEBACK 14-Shannon 1482 18-22 45% 14 CA
22563 OYA 14-Elite 1482 20-14 59% 14 CA
22564 Fusion 15-2 1482 7-5 58% 15 MN
22565 MauLoa VBC 14 Mauloa.Hilo Lehua 1482 4-3 57% 14 HI
22566 AV Coach Kailey 14 1482 4-4 50% 14 CA
22567 Balboa Bay 14-White 1482 20-18 53% 14 CA
22568 Mill City 15-Blue 1482 19-14 58% 15 MA
22569 SMASH Volleyball 15-Aqua 1482 4-3 57% 15 MA
22570 LHVA 14-Black travel 1482 11-12 48% 14 NY
22571 UtahIce 15 1482 3-4 43% 15 UT
22572 WSRVC 18-Amy/heather 1482 5-5 50% 18 WY
22573 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 14-2 1482 2-1 40% 14 KS
22574 Dig This! VB Ohana 15-White 1482 3-7 30% 15 NV
22575 VC Denver 15 Gold 1482 25-24 51% 15 CO
22576 Aggression 14-2 premier 1482 3-3 50% 14 IL
22577 Elkhart 12-Blue 1482 2-2 50% 12 IN
22578 Galaxy 13 Abby 1482 10-14 42% 13 NC
22579 Hot Shots 11-Black 1482 7-7 50% 11 OH
22580 513VB 14-1 1482 18-29 38% 14 OH
22581 R2R 15-1 1482 3-7 30% 15 PA
22582 NJVBC 16-Apex 1482 6-4 60% 16 PA
22583 Voltage 16-Burrs 1482 2-3 40% 16 PA
22584 Cajun Elite 17 Chloe 1482 10-15 40% 17 LA
22585 GCVC 15-Alyssa 1482 8-9 47% 15 IN
22586 Spiketown USA 14.2 1482 12-15 44% 14 WI
22587 Wisconsin Elite 14-Blue 1482 36-25 58% 14 WI
22588 NVPUR 11-Mayrelis 1482 3-2 60% 11 PR
22589 Boltz 14-Beastmode 1482 20-14 59% 14 AZ
22590 417 MoJrs 14-Nat royal 1482 13-17 43% 14 MO
22591 Mizuno CNVBC 14-Galloway 1482 6-9 40% 14 MO
22592 Architects Volleyball Club 17-Black 1482 4-4 50% 17 TX
22593 Impact 17-Black 1482 24-20 53% 17 TX
22594 New WAVE 12-Cyclones 1482 4-2 67% 12 IL
22595 Cap City 16-Reg purple 1482 11-9 44% 16 MT
22596 ThunderStrike 12 12u-ThunderStrike Black - Townsend (MJ) 1482 4-6 40% 12 MI
22597 SVA Girls 16-S black 1482 33-16 67% 16 CO
22598 Reign 13-White 1482 21-13 54% 13 FL
22599 NET 14-Black 1482 12-7 52% 14 AR
22600 ForwardVB 13-Red 1482 14-12 54% 13 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.