Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 388 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
19351 Low Country 18-National 1510 16-30 35% 18 SC
19352 Advantage 14-Black 1510 18-17 51% 14 NC
19353 LCVBC 14-1 1510 3-4 43% 14 WA
19354 HAILI 16 1510 3-2 60% 16 HI
19355 SCVB 14-Max 1510 14-24 37% 14 CA
19356 SA Valkyries 12-Purple 1510 12-12 46% 12 TX
19357 Valley Heat AZ 14-Black 1510 31-30 51% 14 AZ
19358 Iowa United 13-2 premier 1510 14-10 54% 13 IA
19359 Manhattan Mayhem 16-2p 1510 12-11 52% 16 KS
19360 Lady Knights 12 1510 1-2 33% 12 IA
19361 SCVB 17-Max 1510 21-22 49% 17 CA
19362 JM 12 Navy 1510 1-1 25% 12 TX
19363 KVA 14-Lynn 1510 7-6 54% 14 HI
19364 Ascent 14 Mint 1510 15-12 56% 14 AZ
19365 Roseville JO 14-1 1510 6-4 60% 14 MN
19366 Titanas 10-1 1510 1-5 17% 10 PR
19367 Ultimate 14-Black 1510 31-30 51% 14 IL
19368 NASA BHM 13-PURPLE 1510 16-21 43% 13 AL
19369 Millennium Volleyball Club 14 Millennium 14-T.N.M 1510 13-12 52% 14 OH
19370 JVC 11-Gold 1510 6-9 35% 11 IN
19371 SA Empire 11 Legacy 1510 14-11 56% 11 TX
19372 DVC 16-Purple 1510 3-2 60% 16 OH
19373 SEVA 12-White kamryn 1510 5-5 50% 12 NC
19374 Team Pineapple 16-Greend 1510 19-15 56% 16 IN
19375 KODA 16-Underground 1510 16-11 53% 16 NY
19376 Elevate Volleyball 17 Elevate Volleyball Club 1510 4-6 40% 17 PA
19377 Amazons 15-Mambas 1510 21-23 48% 15 AZ
19378 TX FLAMES 12-Premier 1510 10-10 50% 12 TX
19379 SVC 12-Black 1510 7-8 47% 12 MO
19380 Rimrock 18 1510 22-18 50% 18 MT
19381 C2 Sports 18-Crown 1510 23-20 53% 18 TN
19382 Eclipse 16-1 (NE) 1510 36-27 57% 16 NY
19383 Turlock Crush 16-Avery 1510 19-24 44% 16 CA
19384 Boltz 13-Beastmode 1510 24-13 65% 13 AZ
19385 LBJ 14-2 1510 2-1 67% 14 ND
19386 OPVC 16-Lorenzo 1510 17-17 50% 16 OH
19387 Alpha 15-3 1510 24-17 59% 15 KY
19388 WGVBA 13 Elite 1510 15-11 58% 13 TX
19389 Inspired VB 14-White 1510 12-8 57% 14 MN
19390 UNION 13-In white 1510 27-19 59% 13 IN
19391 Crush 14-1 kellogg 1510 24-13 63% 14 GA
19392 NORFOLK VOLLEYBALL CLUB 16 CHAOS RUMBLE 1510 9-5 64% 16
19393 UVC 14-Senor 1510 6-4 60% 14 IL
19394 Club Cyclones Volleyball Pacific 14 1510 3-4 43% 14
19395 ENVY 16-Wildfire 1510 22-16 58% 16 RI
19396 Bedford Volleyball Academy 17 Bedford Volleyball Academy (9) 1510 6-6 40% 17
19397 Tsunami 15-1n 1510 45-38 54% 15 GA
19398 Mission Trails 16-Karmen 1510 5-3 63% 16 CA
19399 Spiketown VBC 10-1 1510 3-2 60% 10 OH
19400 LAVA Islands 16-Premier harold 1510 21-19 53% 16 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.