2025-2026 Season — Page 345 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17201 | APV 17-2 | 1532 | 4-4 | 50% | 17 | TX |
| 17202 | GM Elevate 17-1 | 1532 | 18-11 | 62% | 17 | MN |
| 17203 | Mavericks Volleyball 15 15U MAVERICKS NATIONALS | 1532 | 9-12 | 43% | 15 | LA |
| 17204 | NTXP 16-Amp | 1532 | 1-3 | 20% | 16 | |
| 17205 | MVP 13-Silver | 1532 | 25-17 | 57% | 13 | WI |
| 17206 | RDEVA 14-Lauren | 1532 | 28-23 | 55% | 14 | CO |
| 17207 | VC United 13-1 elite | 1532 | 12-14 | 46% | 13 | IL |
| 17208 | Set'em Up! 15-2n | 1532 | 16-30 | 35% | 15 | FL |
| 17209 | 757 13-Black | 1532 | 16-38 | 30% | 13 | VA |
| 17210 | NOC 13-Blue | 1532 | 15-18 | 45% | 13 | CA |
| 17211 | Tri-Star 16-1 | 1532 | 3-4 | 43% | 16 | TN |
| 17212 | HPSTL 16-White | 1532 | 21-30 | 39% | 16 | MO |
| 17213 | Victory 17-National green | 1532 | 16-21 | 42% | 17 | TX |
| 17214 | Club One AZ 15-Gold | 1532 | 34-39 | 47% | 15 | AZ |
| 17215 | River City 16 (EV) | 1532 | 12-6 | 67% | 16 | WA |
| 17216 | Ho'okino 14-'ohe | 1532 | 7-6 | 50% | 14 | HI |
| 17217 | 516 Elite 13-Ruby | 1532 | 12-14 | 46% | 13 | NY |
| 17218 | Lakers 12 | 1532 | 5-4 | 45% | 12 | NY |
| 17219 | A-E Edge 12-Red | 1532 | 2-2 | 50% | 12 | MN |
| 17220 | ECVBA 14-Kristen | 1532 | 10-10 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 17221 | PIVC Pacifica Ignite 11-Allie | 1532 | 4-4 | 50% | 11 | CA |
| 17222 | Lions Cityside 13-3 | 1532 | 15-18 | 45% | 13 | IL |
| 17223 | Wildcats 14-1 | 1532 | 8-4 | 67% | 14 | MN |
| 17224 | SoCal VBC 13-Frazee | 1532 | 19-19 | 50% | 13 | CA |
| 17225 | RVA G18 Navy | 1532 | 29-29 | 50% | 18 | WI |
| 17226 | Spiketown USA 17 Spiketown USA 17/18N | 1532 | 15-18 | 45% | 17 | WI |
| 17227 | Vision 16-Exv gray | 1532 | 18-12 | 53% | 16 | TX |
| 17228 | Milwaukee Jrs 15-Ignite | 1532 | 43-36 | 54% | 15 | WI |
| 17229 | SA Elite 16-American impact | 1532 | 25-22 | 53% | 16 | MA |
| 17230 | Crossfire Chewelah 14-Purple | 1532 | 2-1 | 67% | 14 | WA |
| 17231 | SPVA 15-1 | 1532 | 12-7 | 57% | 15 | MN |
| 17232 | Upstate 17-Hp | 1532 | 31-23 | 57% | 17 | SC |
| 17233 | Warriors 15-N | 1532 | 28-20 | 58% | 15 | NM |
| 17234 | Main Beach 16-Power | 1532 | 16-12 | 57% | 16 | CA |
| 17235 | NC 18 | 1532 | 5-2 | 56% | 18 | ND |
| 17236 | Ace 16-1 kate | 1532 | 9-13 | 41% | 16 | AK |
| 17237 | Venom Jo Volleyball 18 | 1532 | 6-4 | 60% | 18 | MN |
| 17238 | 806 Volleyball Josh 13-S | 1532 | 30-26 | 52% | 13 | TX |
| 17239 | Sunshine 15 Excel | 1532 | 27-22 | 55% | 15 | CA |
| 17240 | SF Juniors 15-White | 1532 | 3-2 | 60% | 15 | CA |
| 17241 | 308 Exclusive VBC 16-Black | 1532 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | NE |
| 17242 | Sky High 15-Smith | 1532 | 2-2 | 50% | 15 | IL |
| 17243 | Empower 15-National black | 1532 | 30-25 | 55% | 15 | CA |
| 17244 | Next Level 16-Elana | 1532 | 6-4 | 60% | 16 | MI |
| 17245 | CHAOS 12-1 gold | 1532 | 11-10 | 52% | 12 | OR |
| 17246 | FLX Waves 14-1 | 1532 | 10-11 | 45% | 14 | NY |
| 17247 | HAVC 17-M blue | 1532 | 3-2 | 60% | 17 | SD |
| 17248 | SVC 18-Teal | 1532 | 24-14 | 63% | 18 | GA |
| 17249 | Sideout VBC 13-1 | 1532 | 4-3 | 57% | 13 | WA |
| 17250 | GCVA 17-1 coast | 1532 | 24-20 | 53% | 17 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.