Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 312 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
15551 Heat 14-White 1550 13-7 54% 14 NV
15552 Red Storm 14 Elite 1550 20-17 54% 14 LA
15553 UPONTOP 17-S elite 1550 34-31 52% 17 FL
15554 Servus VC 12-1 1550 4-1 80% 12 CA
15555 Velocity 12-Red 1 1550 8-6 57% 12 MS
15556 Mizuno M1 13-1 1550 39-29 57% 13 MN
15557 ALL IN 18-1 khuon 1550 16-12 57% 18 NV
15558 Kokoro Volleyball 18-1 1550 18-35 34% 18 MN
15559 A4 Volley 15-Lolo 1550 28-21 57% 15 CA
15560 NorthsideOut Chicago 13-Ub 1550 8-6 57% 13 IL
15561 TC ELITE 12-B 1550 2-2 40% 12 LA
15562 Iowa Storm 12 Storm 6th Black 1550 5-4 56% 12 IA
15563 Illini NW 14U Silver 1550 15-10 58% 14 IL
15564 COA 13-Otters 1550 16-12 57% 13 IN
15565 Kokoro Volleyball 15-2 1550 59-55 52% 15 MN
15566 SVBC Spirit 13-Navy 1550 3-2 60% 13 IA
15567 HV United VBC 13-Blue 1550 12-4 75% 13 MI
15568 Na Ka'o O Kohala 14-S 1550 3-2 60% 14 HI
15569 516 Elite 14-Black 1550 26-20 57% 14 NY
15570 Blaze 16-1 1550 6-4 60% 16 IA
15571 Katy Volleyball 17 Nike 1550 28-13 68% 17 TX
15572 SMVA 12-Quantum nationals 1550 19-14 56% 12 MO
15573 Empire VBC 14-1 1550 7-1 88% 14 CA
15574 Ballyhoo 15-Purple 1550 19-14 58% 15 PA
15575 North Coast 12-Blue 1550 16-8 67% 12 CA
15576 BEVC Kryptonite 18-Black 1550 17-13 57% 18 NC
15577 A4 Volley 16-Daniel 1550 27-17 61% 16 CA
15578 Summit 13-Nat'l blue 1550 3-1 60% 13 TX
15579 573 12-National r 1550 18-11 62% 12 MO
15580 SynergyForce 15-Red 1550 17-11 61% 15 CA
15581 Oasis 15-Sf teal 1550 17-5 77% 15 CA
15582 X-Statics 18-S black 1550 12-11 52% 18 CO
15583 218 Elite 14-S 1550 4-1 80% 14 MN
15584 Domination 15-B 1550 20-12 63% 15 MI
15585 AZRVB 14-Riot 1550 42-25 62% 14 AZ
15586 SJVC 13-Blue 1550 3-2 60% 13 FL
15587 SF Elite 14 Ken 1549 16-17 48% 14 CA
15588 Erie Elite Ana 14 1549 13-6 68% 14 OH
15589 TVA 11-1 1549 6-5 55% 11 FL
15590 Lockdown VBC 18-Ospreys 1549 24-24 50% 18 MA
15591 Momentum Volley 16 Momentum Volley XVI (CA) 1549 3-4 43% 16
15592 Chill Volleyball Club 14-Cormier 1549 5-3 63% 14
15593 HPVBC Teal Storm 14U 1549 50-24 68% 14 TX
15594 Pitt United 14-Red 1549 29-18 60% 14 PA
15595 East TX Jrs 16-Mavs 1549 13-9 52% 16
15596 Mizuno Northern Lights 18-B 1549 17-20 46% 18 MN
15597 OT 15-O emily 1549 29-30 49% 15 FL
15598 AVC 11-Blue 1549 3-2 60% 11 NE
15599 Shockwave 11 1549 5-4 56% 11 WA
15600 Billtown 17-Pink 1549 11-8 55% 17 PA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.