2025-2026 Season — Page 312 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15551 | Heat 14-White | 1550 | 13-7 | 54% | 14 | NV |
| 15552 | Red Storm 14 Elite | 1550 | 20-17 | 54% | 14 | LA |
| 15553 | UPONTOP 17-S elite | 1550 | 34-31 | 52% | 17 | FL |
| 15554 | Servus VC 12-1 | 1550 | 4-1 | 80% | 12 | CA |
| 15555 | Velocity 12-Red 1 | 1550 | 8-6 | 57% | 12 | MS |
| 15556 | Mizuno M1 13-1 | 1550 | 39-29 | 57% | 13 | MN |
| 15557 | ALL IN 18-1 khuon | 1550 | 16-12 | 57% | 18 | NV |
| 15558 | Kokoro Volleyball 18-1 | 1550 | 18-35 | 34% | 18 | MN |
| 15559 | A4 Volley 15-Lolo | 1550 | 28-21 | 57% | 15 | CA |
| 15560 | NorthsideOut Chicago 13-Ub | 1550 | 8-6 | 57% | 13 | IL |
| 15561 | TC ELITE 12-B | 1550 | 2-2 | 40% | 12 | LA |
| 15562 | Iowa Storm 12 Storm 6th Black | 1550 | 5-4 | 56% | 12 | IA |
| 15563 | Illini NW 14U Silver | 1550 | 15-10 | 58% | 14 | IL |
| 15564 | COA 13-Otters | 1550 | 16-12 | 57% | 13 | IN |
| 15565 | Kokoro Volleyball 15-2 | 1550 | 59-55 | 52% | 15 | MN |
| 15566 | SVBC Spirit 13-Navy | 1550 | 3-2 | 60% | 13 | IA |
| 15567 | HV United VBC 13-Blue | 1550 | 12-4 | 75% | 13 | MI |
| 15568 | Na Ka'o O Kohala 14-S | 1550 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | HI |
| 15569 | 516 Elite 14-Black | 1550 | 26-20 | 57% | 14 | NY |
| 15570 | Blaze 16-1 | 1550 | 6-4 | 60% | 16 | IA |
| 15571 | Katy Volleyball 17 Nike | 1550 | 28-13 | 68% | 17 | TX |
| 15572 | SMVA 12-Quantum nationals | 1550 | 19-14 | 56% | 12 | MO |
| 15573 | Empire VBC 14-1 | 1550 | 7-1 | 88% | 14 | CA |
| 15574 | Ballyhoo 15-Purple | 1550 | 19-14 | 58% | 15 | PA |
| 15575 | North Coast 12-Blue | 1550 | 16-8 | 67% | 12 | CA |
| 15576 | BEVC Kryptonite 18-Black | 1550 | 17-13 | 57% | 18 | NC |
| 15577 | A4 Volley 16-Daniel | 1550 | 27-17 | 61% | 16 | CA |
| 15578 | Summit 13-Nat'l blue | 1550 | 3-1 | 60% | 13 | TX |
| 15579 | 573 12-National r | 1550 | 18-11 | 62% | 12 | MO |
| 15580 | SynergyForce 15-Red | 1550 | 17-11 | 61% | 15 | CA |
| 15581 | Oasis 15-Sf teal | 1550 | 17-5 | 77% | 15 | CA |
| 15582 | X-Statics 18-S black | 1550 | 12-11 | 52% | 18 | CO |
| 15583 | 218 Elite 14-S | 1550 | 4-1 | 80% | 14 | MN |
| 15584 | Domination 15-B | 1550 | 20-12 | 63% | 15 | MI |
| 15585 | AZRVB 14-Riot | 1550 | 42-25 | 62% | 14 | AZ |
| 15586 | SJVC 13-Blue | 1550 | 3-2 | 60% | 13 | FL |
| 15587 | SF Elite 14 Ken | 1549 | 16-17 | 48% | 14 | CA |
| 15588 | Erie Elite Ana 14 | 1549 | 13-6 | 68% | 14 | OH |
| 15589 | TVA 11-1 | 1549 | 6-5 | 55% | 11 | FL |
| 15590 | Lockdown VBC 18-Ospreys | 1549 | 24-24 | 50% | 18 | MA |
| 15591 | Momentum Volley 16 Momentum Volley XVI (CA) | 1549 | 3-4 | 43% | 16 | |
| 15592 | Chill Volleyball Club 14-Cormier | 1549 | 5-3 | 63% | 14 | |
| 15593 | HPVBC Teal Storm 14U | 1549 | 50-24 | 68% | 14 | TX |
| 15594 | Pitt United 14-Red | 1549 | 29-18 | 60% | 14 | PA |
| 15595 | East TX Jrs 16-Mavs | 1549 | 13-9 | 52% | 16 | |
| 15596 | Mizuno Northern Lights 18-B | 1549 | 17-20 | 46% | 18 | MN |
| 15597 | OT 15-O emily | 1549 | 29-30 | 49% | 15 | FL |
| 15598 | AVC 11-Blue | 1549 | 3-2 | 60% | 11 | NE |
| 15599 | Shockwave 11 | 1549 | 5-4 | 56% | 11 | WA |
| 15600 | Billtown 17-Pink | 1549 | 11-8 | 55% | 17 | PA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.