Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 311 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
15501 Topeka Saints 11 Navy 1550 4-2 67% 11 KS
15502 SWVBC G16-BLUE 1550 40-22 65% 16 WI
15503 GM Elevate 16-1 1550 14-6 70% 16 MN
15504 WAVE ALLIANCE VOLLEYBALL 14-1 1550 4-1 80% 14 FL
15505 Mililani 18-1 1550 11-6 65% 18 HI
15506 704 VBC 13-1 1550 2-5 29% 13 GA
15507 Lafayette Starlings 18-Catherine 1550 17-7 71% 18 LA
15508 Concord 13-Campanello 1550 2-1 67% 13 IN
15509 The 606 11-Red 1550 4-1 80% 11 IL
15510 HYPE 17-1 1550 14-3 70% 17 MN
15511 RVA 10-Gold 1550 12-5 63% 10 MD
15512 VVA 17-Clarke 1550 23-17 57% 17 CA
15513 BRAVO 16-White 1550 16-12 57% 16 KY
15514 UVC 13-Winter 1550 7-3 70% 13 IL
15515 Summit Volleyball Club 16-2 1550 3-1 75% 16 MO
15516 South KC Juniors 13-1 1550 4-2 67% 13 KS
15517 DCVA 13-Stephanie 1550 17-18 49% 13 NM
15518 CGSV 17-Bates 1550 16-8 67% 17 OH
15519 UNION 15 Gold 1550 47-30 61% 15 IN
15520 Central VBC 16-1 1550 5-3 63% 16 NV
15521 Ta'ahine AZ Club 16 Ta’ahine AZ TAPU LULULULU (AZ) (29) 1550 37-17 69% 16 AZ
15522 OP2 13-2 1550 2-0 100% 13
15523 Celtique 15-F �lite 1550 5-4 56% 15
15524 Power 14-Purple 1550 25-24 49% 14 TX
15525 Island Thunder Volleyball Club 12-Baden 1550 23-21 52% 12 WA
15526 Shockwave Volleyball Club 17 17U SWVC National Blue 1550 12-18 39% 17
15527 Mustang VBC 14-1 1550 4-2 67% 14 NY
15528 North Storm VBC 15-1 1550 7-7 39% 15
15529 Iowa Storm 12 Storm 6th Black 1550 5-4 56% 12 IA
15530 Servus VC 12-1 1550 4-1 80% 12 CA
15531 SMVA 12-Quantum nationals 1550 19-14 56% 12 MO
15532 X-Statics 18-S black 1550 12-11 52% 18 CO
15533 Royal Legends 17-Blue 1550 24-28 46% 17 PA
15534 A'o a Koa Volleyball 16-G 1550 23-18 56% 16 HI
15535 Madtown Volleyball 12-1 1550 5-4 56% 12 WI
15536 HV United VBC 13-Blue 1550 12-4 75% 13 MI
15537 516 Elite 14-Black 1550 26-20 57% 14 NY
15538 Katy Volleyball 17 Nike 1550 28-13 68% 17 TX
15539 Kokoro Volleyball 18-1 1550 18-35 34% 18 MN
15540 TC ELITE 12-B 1550 2-2 40% 12 LA
15541 Empire VBC 14-1 1550 7-1 88% 14 CA
15542 Ballyhoo 15-Purple 1550 19-14 58% 15 PA
15543 North Coast 12-Blue 1550 16-8 67% 12 CA
15544 BEVC Kryptonite 18-Black 1550 17-13 57% 18 NC
15545 573 12-National r 1550 18-11 62% 12 MO
15546 SynergyForce 15-Red 1550 17-11 61% 15 CA
15547 Oasis 15-Sf teal 1550 17-5 77% 15 CA
15548 218 Elite 14-S 1550 4-1 80% 14 MN
15549 Domination 15-B 1550 20-12 63% 15 MI
15550 AZRVB 14-Riot 1550 42-25 62% 14 AZ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.