Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 283 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
14101 JCVC 15-2 1567 7-4 64% 15 NC
14102 TopSpin 14-Red 1567 19-17 53% 14 KY
14103 Shonto Starlings 16-S purple 1567 27-17 61% 16 AZ
14104 HOU STARS 18-Adidas 1567 28-21 57% 18 TX
14105 OVVC 12-North 1567 5-1 83% 12 OH
14106 NC Intensity 13-U jeff 1567 12-7 63% 13 NC
14107 3DGE 17-3 gold 1567 2-5 29% 17 PA
14108 Spiketown VBC 12-1 1567 9-7 56% 12 OH
14109 Sporting Albany Girls 15 1567 22-14 61% 15 NY
14110 London Elite 15-Blue 1567 7-3 70% 15 OH
14111 Empowered Volleyball Academy 13 OVC Henderson 1567 14-12 54% 13 IN
14112 SIVA 17 CADY 1567 36-26 58% 17 WA
14113 KSA 14-Red 1567 34-16 68% 14 KY
14114 A4 Volley 16-Mark 1567 26-28 48% 16 CA
14115 Apex NW 14-Summit 1567 23-23 50% 14 WA
14116 OYA 14-Sigma 1567 3-0 100% 14 CA
14117 Trinity Valley 17 1567 6-3 60% 17
14118 Xcel 15-Red 1567 0-0 0% 15 AL
14119 Impact VC 18-1 1566 16-11 59% 18 OH
14120 MVSA 11 Chaos 1566 22-15 50% 11 MD
14121 M2 Volleyball 11-N1 1566 18-18 50% 11 GA
14122 TVA 12-Rise kaleah 1566 10-5 67% 12 FL
14123 VC United 15-3 elite 1566 26-15 63% 15 IL
14124 PAEVA 13-Maroon 1566 16-12 57% 13 PA
14125 LIV 14-Black andrii 1566 16-13 55% 14 CA
14126 NWI Premier NWI 16-Black 1566 2-3 40% 16 IA
14127 A'o a Koa Volleyball 15-G 1566 23-26 47% 15 HI
14128 603 United 16-Seacoast white 1566 19-19 50% 16 NH
14129 HorseshoeVBC 17-1 1566 2-6 25% 17 PA
14130 CID 13-Blue 1566 22-17 55% 13 ID
14131 YVA 14-Blue 1566 19-11 58% 14 MT
14132 NE D-League 11 1566 7-3 70% 11 IA
14133 Lady Strikers 14-White 1566 7-4 64% 14 CO
14134 CMAJO 12 1566 3-0 75% 12 MN
14135 TeamLVC 12-Black 1566 19-12 59% 12 NY
14136 Lineshot Volleyball Club 15 15 Purple National 1566 5-5 50% 15 OH
14137 DIVC 12-Purple 1566 14-10 56% 12 IL
14138 HEAT 16-National khanh 1566 30-28 52% 16 CA
14139 Midwest Intensity VBC 12U 1566 17-9 52% 12 MO
14140 Hutchinson 14-1 1566 3-2 60% 14 MN
14141 Quickset 16 1566 5-2 71% 16 PA
14142 OWV 14-Elite 1566 5-3 63% 14 FL
14143 MemphisVBAcademy 17-Red 1566 25-16 61% 17 MS
14144 JAG VBC 15-2 national 1566 45-27 63% 15 WI
14145 Roanoke United 14-Red 1566 39-26 60% 14 VA
14146 MOD Elite 17-Black 1566 24-18 57% 17 IL
14147 Libero 11 Huskies 1566 11-8 58% 11 VA
14148 Topeka Saints 12-1 1566 4-3 57% 12 KS
14149 SF Juniors 11-Black 1566 25-17 60% 11 CA
14150 Illini NW 11U Gold 1566 12-7 63% 11 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.