Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 282 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
14051 Salt City Smash VBC 17-1 1567 6-0 86% 17 KS
14052 Prodigy 14-2 elite 1567 20-17 54% 14 NY
14053 Hill Country Axis 17-1 blue 1567 26-21 55% 17 TX
14054 High Desert 16-S - angel 1567 3-4 43% 16 CA
14055 Country Fire 14-2 1567 19-12 61% 14 TX
14056 Cascade 14 1567 44-33 54% 14 WA
14057 Spartans 13 1567 10-7 59% 13 IN
14058 MSV 11 1567 4-2 67% 11 MS
14059 HIC 18 Kim 1567 4-9 31% 18 UT
14060 Rockwood Thunder 11-Navy 1567 29-29 50% 11 MO
14061 ACV 12-Red 1567 7-2 78% 12 IA
14062 FC Flames 14 1567 8-3 73% 14 CO
14063 FRVBC 17-Red 1567 19-15 56% 17 CO
14064 Integrity 13-Club blue 1567 16-9 57% 13 PA
14065 MEVC 12-2 1567 9-6 53% 12 SC
14066 797 Empire 17-S 1567 18-10 64% 17 TX
14067 NL 16-Gold 1567 30-15 67% 16 MI
14068 SMASH 12-S 1567 23-23 50% 12 MA
14069 Winter League 10-2 1567 3-1 75% 10 IL
14070 Wildflower 15-Sunflower 1567 19-16 54% 15 CA
14071 Four1Nine Xtreme 15 15-Williams (OV) (13) 1567 5-1 83% 15 OH
14072 IVC 15-Home 1567 3-1 75% 15 AK
14073 PVA 15-National (KE) 1567 25-20 54% 15 PA
14074 EU 18-Black 1567 13-14 48% 18 IN
14075 Exile 13 1567 10-4 59% 13 IA
14076 C1VB In-house MS 14-Liz 1567 2-0 50% 14 SC
14077 Team Atlantis 16-Koepper 1567 5-1 83% 16 OH
14078 UVA 13-Local 1567 5-2 71% 13 LA
14079 FSJ 13 National 1567 22-15 59% 13 AR
14080 Millennium 13-Clouse 1567 27-22 55% 13 OH
14081 Central VBC 12-Silver 1567 5-2 71% 12 CA
14082 MiElite 11-Pipeline east 1567 11-7 61% 11 MI
14083 TXP 12-Black aaron 1567 27-24 50% 12 TX
14084 T10 Jrs 12-1 1567 3-1 75% 12 NE
14085 Bubbles United 11-1 1567 3-0 100% 11 FL
14086 904 Elite Volleyball 13 13's 1567 5-1 83% 13 FL
14087 Dive 16-Blue 1567 27-27 50% 16 CO
14088 Impact 18-1 1567 17-11 61% 18 MN
14089 Illini United 14 1567 15-10 60% 14 IL
14090 Danville Jrs 12U 1567 16-10 62% 12 IN
14091 HP 10-Black 1567 4-1 80% 10 MI
14092 NM HEAT 14-1 1567 4-2 67% 14 MI
14093 Sportime 16-Black 1567 26-26 50% 16 NY
14094 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 16-A 1567 4-3 57% 16 KS
14095 NE D-League 16-Black 1567 6-4 60% 16 IA
14096 Team One 15 Onyx 1567 21-16 57% 15 IN
14097 The HBC 17-Black 1567 30-14 68% 17 CA
14098 Momentum Volleyball 14-Angelina 1567 21-20 51% 14 CO
14099 TuoCo Elite 14-S 1567 13-15 46% 14 CA
14100 Idaho Show 15-National hadden 1567 7-6 54% 15 ID
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.