2025-2026 Season — Page 282 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14051 | Salt City Smash VBC 17-1 | 1567 | 6-0 | 86% | 17 | KS |
| 14052 | Prodigy 14-2 elite | 1567 | 20-17 | 54% | 14 | NY |
| 14053 | Hill Country Axis 17-1 blue | 1567 | 26-21 | 55% | 17 | TX |
| 14054 | High Desert 16-S - angel | 1567 | 3-4 | 43% | 16 | CA |
| 14055 | Country Fire 14-2 | 1567 | 19-12 | 61% | 14 | TX |
| 14056 | Cascade 14 | 1567 | 44-33 | 54% | 14 | WA |
| 14057 | Spartans 13 | 1567 | 10-7 | 59% | 13 | IN |
| 14058 | MSV 11 | 1567 | 4-2 | 67% | 11 | MS |
| 14059 | HIC 18 Kim | 1567 | 4-9 | 31% | 18 | UT |
| 14060 | Rockwood Thunder 11-Navy | 1567 | 29-29 | 50% | 11 | MO |
| 14061 | ACV 12-Red | 1567 | 7-2 | 78% | 12 | IA |
| 14062 | FC Flames 14 | 1567 | 8-3 | 73% | 14 | CO |
| 14063 | FRVBC 17-Red | 1567 | 19-15 | 56% | 17 | CO |
| 14064 | Integrity 13-Club blue | 1567 | 16-9 | 57% | 13 | PA |
| 14065 | MEVC 12-2 | 1567 | 9-6 | 53% | 12 | SC |
| 14066 | 797 Empire 17-S | 1567 | 18-10 | 64% | 17 | TX |
| 14067 | NL 16-Gold | 1567 | 30-15 | 67% | 16 | MI |
| 14068 | SMASH 12-S | 1567 | 23-23 | 50% | 12 | MA |
| 14069 | Winter League 10-2 | 1567 | 3-1 | 75% | 10 | IL |
| 14070 | Wildflower 15-Sunflower | 1567 | 19-16 | 54% | 15 | CA |
| 14071 | Four1Nine Xtreme 15 15-Williams (OV) (13) | 1567 | 5-1 | 83% | 15 | OH |
| 14072 | IVC 15-Home | 1567 | 3-1 | 75% | 15 | AK |
| 14073 | PVA 15-National (KE) | 1567 | 25-20 | 54% | 15 | PA |
| 14074 | EU 18-Black | 1567 | 13-14 | 48% | 18 | IN |
| 14075 | Exile 13 | 1567 | 10-4 | 59% | 13 | IA |
| 14076 | C1VB In-house MS 14-Liz | 1567 | 2-0 | 50% | 14 | SC |
| 14077 | Team Atlantis 16-Koepper | 1567 | 5-1 | 83% | 16 | OH |
| 14078 | UVA 13-Local | 1567 | 5-2 | 71% | 13 | LA |
| 14079 | FSJ 13 National | 1567 | 22-15 | 59% | 13 | AR |
| 14080 | Millennium 13-Clouse | 1567 | 27-22 | 55% | 13 | OH |
| 14081 | Central VBC 12-Silver | 1567 | 5-2 | 71% | 12 | CA |
| 14082 | MiElite 11-Pipeline east | 1567 | 11-7 | 61% | 11 | MI |
| 14083 | TXP 12-Black aaron | 1567 | 27-24 | 50% | 12 | TX |
| 14084 | T10 Jrs 12-1 | 1567 | 3-1 | 75% | 12 | NE |
| 14085 | Bubbles United 11-1 | 1567 | 3-0 | 100% | 11 | FL |
| 14086 | 904 Elite Volleyball 13 13's | 1567 | 5-1 | 83% | 13 | FL |
| 14087 | Dive 16-Blue | 1567 | 27-27 | 50% | 16 | CO |
| 14088 | Impact 18-1 | 1567 | 17-11 | 61% | 18 | MN |
| 14089 | Illini United 14 | 1567 | 15-10 | 60% | 14 | IL |
| 14090 | Danville Jrs 12U | 1567 | 16-10 | 62% | 12 | IN |
| 14091 | HP 10-Black | 1567 | 4-1 | 80% | 10 | MI |
| 14092 | NM HEAT 14-1 | 1567 | 4-2 | 67% | 14 | MI |
| 14093 | Sportime 16-Black | 1567 | 26-26 | 50% | 16 | NY |
| 14094 | Ks Networks Volleyball Club 16-A | 1567 | 4-3 | 57% | 16 | KS |
| 14095 | NE D-League 16-Black | 1567 | 6-4 | 60% | 16 | IA |
| 14096 | Team One 15 Onyx | 1567 | 21-16 | 57% | 15 | IN |
| 14097 | The HBC 17-Black | 1567 | 30-14 | 68% | 17 | CA |
| 14098 | Momentum Volleyball 14-Angelina | 1567 | 21-20 | 51% | 14 | CO |
| 14099 | TuoCo Elite 14-S | 1567 | 13-15 | 46% | 14 | CA |
| 14100 | Idaho Show 15-National hadden | 1567 | 7-6 | 54% | 15 | ID |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.