Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 276 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
13751 CVBC 17-1s 1571 15-23 39% 17 IN
13752 Starlings S-N-P 14-Coach mina 1571 4-1 80% 14 CA
13753 SERVE VBC 14-2 1571 11-4 73% 14 OH
13754 MWS 17-Black 1571 13-6 68% 17 IL
13755 SMVA 14-Quantum nationals 1571 21-13 60% 14 MO
13756 Slainte 14-National 1571 9-14 39% 14 CA
13757 HP South 16 Premier 1571 24-26 48% 16 MO
13758 314 VBC 17-Red 1571 33-29 52% 17 MO
13759 AVL Trailblazers 17-S 1571 20-11 65% 17 TN
13760 Selected 16-S - carter 1571 37-33 47% 16 NV
13761 Spiketown VBC 14-2 1571 9-7 56% 14 OH
13762 #951 Elite 15-1 1571 30-22 58% 15 CA
13763 Integrity Elite 13-S 1571 8-6 53% 13 IL
13764 TAV Houston 11-Black 1571 20-20 48% 11 TX
13765 BSVBC 10-Blue 1571 9-7 56% 10 IL
13766 JJVA 17-Black 1571 37-29 56% 17 FL
13767 K1 Bayamon 13-20 1571 8-6 57% 13 PR
13768 MAVS 816 15-Premier 1571 16-15 52% 15 KS
13769 ESVC 15-Blue 1571 22-15 59% 15 AL
13770 KODA 16 West 1571 20-11 54% 16 NY
13771 Ama 212 17-Legacy 1571 28-17 62% 17 TX
13772 MJVA 15-3 1571 0-0 0% 15 GA
13773 NorthShore Volleyball Club 17-White 1571 5-3 63% 17 OH
13774 WPA 16-Jordan 1571 10-4 71% 16 PA
13775 PIVC Storm 15-Pwr savage 1571 31-16 66% 15 AL
13776 NIVA 14 JADE 1571 29-14 67% 14 IN
13777 COLA 16-Grey 1571 3-5 38% 16 CA
13778 NOVA 16-National 1571 43-20 68% 16 LA
13779 Beach Cities 16 Smack 1571 25-27 48% 16 CA
13780 WC 15-1 1571 0-0 0% 15 GA
13781 JNVBC 15-E teal 1571 29-13 66% 15 IA
13782 Central Alberta Queens Volleyball Club 15-Altitude 1571 5-2 71% 15
13783 Providence Junior Pilots Volleyball Club 14-Girls navy 1571 5-2 71% 14
13784 East TX Jrs 13-Sabine 1571 8-4 62% 13
13785 Richmond Volleyball Club 13 RVC VYVL Stingrays 1571 3-2 60% 13
13786 Ottawa Fusion Volleyball Club 16 Ottawa Fusion Purple - Sam 1571 4-1 67% 16 ON
13787 Spokane Ignite 16-Ignition 1570 4-4 50% 16
13788 PROJECT SPIKERS 16 1570 15-10 48% 16
13789 Western Mass 18-Pride 1570 37-25 58% 18 MA
13790 Jaguars 18-Black 1570 27-18 57% 18 NY
13791 ESO 16 Prime 1570 11-10 52% 16 OH
13792 Send Me Surge 14-1 1570 9-7 56% 14 AL
13793 573 Missouri Juniors 14-2 1570 5-6 31% 14 MO
13794 RDE 15-Colette 1570 9-7 56% 15 CO
13795 Chelsea Volleyball Club 14-1 1570 3-1 75% 14 MI
13796 KLUB 13-S 1570 11-6 58% 13 NV
13797 Santa Fe Storm 13-1 joylynn 1570 0-0 0% 13 CO
13798 A5 11-Sydney 1570 22-14 61% 11 GA
13799 BRAVO 16-Black 1570 23-23 49% 16 KY
13800 Triangle 15 Silver 1570 37-22 63% 15 NC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.