Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 275 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
13701 TI Elite 14-Ss allison 1571 33-27 55% 14 IN
13702 NW Elite 14-3 red 1571 27-17 59% 14 OR
13703 IVC 16-National-2 1571 8-5 50% 16 AK
13704 Orange Crush 14 1571 8-5 57% 14 IA
13705 SVC 15 14 1571 10-6 63% 14 FL
13706 Ultimate VBC 17-Gold 1571 5-2 71% 17 IL
13707 MOCO Volleyball Club LLC 12 MOCO (MD) Mystics 1571 6-7 46% 12 MD
13708 Oiler Attack 11-Black 1571 3-1 75% 11 OH
13709 JSV Elite 13 1571 4-1 80% 13 GA
13710 Horseshoe 16-1 1571 21-12 54% 16 MT
13711 Hawaiian Style 14-Black 1571 16-14 53% 14 HI
13712 DIGS Volleyball Club 17-White 1571 25-14 64% 17 NJ
13713 MP Storm 17-Black 1571 4-4 50% 17 NE
13714 Legends Volleyball Club 17 17s King 1571 4-1 80% 17 PR
13715 360 Volleyball Club 17 17.1 1571 5-2 71% 17 TX
13716 Cajun Elite 16-1 1571 4-3 57% 16 LA
13717 NKJV Coyotes 16-1 1571 23-10 70% 16 VA
13718 SETX Boom 11 1571 8-5 53% 11 TX
13719 UP North Jr's DSN 12-Navy 1571 12-6 67% 12 WI
13720 MJVA 11-Elite black 1571 18-13 55% 11 TN
13721 Webo 11-1s addie/ella 1571 7-5 58% 11 IN
13722 Six Pack Legit 11-G royal 1571 4-1 80% 11 IA
13723 Kairos 13 Delta 1571 21-15 58% 13 SD
13724 LVC 14-Gold 1571 4-3 44% 14 NY
13725 Club Gemini 15-Flames 1571 26-14 60% 15 MO
13726 NorCal 12-2 blue 1571 18-26 41% 12 CA
13727 Slam VBC 12 Gold 1571 9-5 64% 12 WI
13728 CTX Juniors 15-Blue 1571 19-14 58% 15 TX
13729 Renaissance 17-Red bc 1571 16-9 64% 17 OH
13730 TX432 13-1 1571 3-4 43% 13 TX
13731 Temecula Viper 12-2 audrey 1571 17-10 63% 12 CA
13732 Dig It 15 1571 10-4 71% 15 CA
13733 Burns VBC 14-2 1571 8-0 100% 14 ID
13734 Northern Heat 15-1 1571 14-7 67% 15 MN
13735 Iowa Select 15-Reid 1571 18-16 45% 15 IA
13736 A4 Volley 16-Kortney 1571 26-18 59% 16 CA
13737 Horseshoe VBC 17-Black 1571 20-18 48% 17 PA
13738 Midwest United 12 NAVY 1571 27-11 71% 12 MN
13739 Pipeline 16-1 1571 16-26 38% 16 CA
13740 NSSC 16-Black 1571 26-18 57% 16 MO
13741 Arlington 14 1571 3-2 60% 14 SD
13742 East Coast Power Chesapeake 16-Black 1571 14-22 39% 16 MD
13743 Midwest Juniors 15-1 1571 8-4 67% 15 KS
13744 Flight 16 Dahlias 1571 20-14 59% 16 IL
13745 New Heights Volleyball Club 16 1571 3-0 100% 16 WY
13746 Endless 13-Navy 1571 21-10 54% 13 TX
13747 NNJ 13-Malia 1571 9-7 56% 13 NV
13748 Momentous VBC 16-Jeff 1571 17-10 63% 16 CA
13749 MOVSelect 16-Green 1571 29-22 57% 16 OH
13750 City Beach 14-Green 1571 41-23 64% 14 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.