Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 743 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
37101 WAVE ALLIANCE VOLLEYBALL 14-2 1342 1-4 20% 14 FL
37102 FIEL 17 1342 3-8 27% 17 MX
37103 REVO 15 1342 0-4 0% 15 MI
37104 Net Force 16-4 black 1342 5-14 26% 16 IA
37105 Unified 12-Blue 1342 6-13 30% 12 MI
37106 Utah Ice 15-Mike 1342 1-6 14% 15 UT
37107 HBJ 15-Russellville 1342 0-4 0% 15 AR
37108 SNIPERS VBC 16-1 g 1342 5-10 33% 16 NV
37109 NecTr 16-Tony 1342 1-4 20% 16 NV
37110 Club Unite 14-Lw teal 1342 6-14 30% 14 TN
37111 SW Tidal Wave 15-1 1342 12-18 40% 15 FL
37112 MOVA UA 12-Black 1342 13-23 34% 12 MO
37113 CCAVBC 15-Pink 1342 9-13 41% 15 FL
37114 Southland Aces VBC 12-1 1342 2-3 33% 12 MO
37115 NLVC 15-Royal 1342 15-24 38% 15 TX
37116 GSJ West 15-Purple 1342 19-27 41% 15 SC
37117 Alpha 17-3 1342 15-22 41% 17 KY
37118 BVBC Kaylee 14-S 1342 3-7 30% 14 CA
37119 Impact 14-Red 1342 4-8 29% 14 NY
37120 EMV 15-Royal catrina 1342 12-23 31% 15 TX
37121 JVC 12-Black 1342 4-9 27% 12 IN
37122 Renaissance 16-White cran 1342 5-14 26% 16 OH
37123 Eclipse 14-2 1342 2-6 25% 14 NY
37124 SpikeHers 14-Pink 1342 8-23 26% 14 NY
37125 CGSV 12-Kent 1342 0-4 0% 12 OH
37126 Windom Zeds 14-3 colbert 1342 0-4 0% 14 SD
37127 HP South 11-Titanium 1342 6-22 21% 11 MO
37128 Champion 13-N purple 1342 12-26 32% 13 NC
37129 SADDLEBACK 15-Jillian 1342 8-19 30% 15 CA
37130 AAVC 13-Black 1342 9-18 33% 13 CA
37131 CLVC 12-Red 1342 0-5 0% 12 NC
37132 DigThis! Ohana 14-White 1342 0-4 0% 14 WA
37133 Club GSL West 11-Ben 1342 2-8 20% 11 UT
37134 Crank It 13-Gold 1342 13-17 43% 13 MI
37135 WC 15-Elite black 1342 3-9 25% 15 TX
37136 Northwoods Blizzard 16 1342 1-4 20% 16 WI
37137 Emerald Force 17 1342 9-15 38% 17 TN
37138 757 14-R courtney 1342 14-22 39% 14 VA
37139 Surge 14-5 power 1342 3-7 30% 14 AL
37140 Actsports 18-Turner/figueroa 1342 9-11 45% 18 VA
37141 Stars Jr VBC 14-1 1342 11-19 37% 14 IN
37142 Holtville 14-Jasmine 1342 2-5 29% 14 CA
37143 Excel NWO VBC 17 1342 12-13 48% 17 IN
37144 MN Royals 18-2 1342 4-13 24% 18 MN
37145 Brooklyn Elite Volleyball 17-Elite 1342 15-30 33% 17 NY
37146 Annapolis 16-Travel 1342 12-39 22% 16 MD
37147 KC Impact Volleyball Club 15-1 1342 3-3 38% 15
37148 Lex United 15-White 1342 35-57 38% 15 KY
37149 Emerald Rain 18-Elite 1342 7-12 37% 18 WA
37150 Wolfpack 18 1342 3-6 33% 18 WA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.