Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 727 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
36301 Next Gen 16-Gold 1352 27-37 41% 16 MO
36302 Achieve Red 16 1352 17-24 41% 16 CO
36303 LA Diggers 12-S white 1352 6-11 35% 12 MN
36304 Rattlers 15-Black 1352 1-6 14% 15
36305 NK 16-Ice 1352 4-8 31% 16 ND
36306 Fort Sask Sonic VC 15-Blue 1352 1-6 14% 15
36307 VC Power VBC 13 VCP pink 1351 8-10 44% 13
36308 STRIKE 17-Red 1351 20-37 34% 17 AZ
36309 Athena 14-Jaden 1351 6-15 29% 14 CA
36310 WC Aces - 13-Hearts 1351 9-9 50% 13 IL
36311 Peak Performance Volleyball Academy 14-2 1351 10-20 33% 14 SC
36312 Zona VBC 15-R4 1351 12-9 57% 15 AZ
36313 NM Cactus VBC 18-1 1351 7-15 32% 18 NM
36314 Yakima Elite 16 Vison 1351 14-24 37% 16 WA
36315 Rimrock 16 1351 10-22 24% 16 MT
36316 Lineshot 12-Pink american 1351 2-6 25% 12 OH
36317 OYVBA 14-Black 1351 0-4 0% 14 MN
36318 Performance Elite 14-1 1351 11-15 42% 14 NY
36319 Buhl 16-R 1351 0-4 0% 16 OH
36320 RVC 15-White (TX) 1351 2-6 25% 15 TX
36321 BVC 15-Shawn 1351 1-6 14% 15 IA
36322 PC Elite 12-K 1351 3-8 20% 12 TX
36323 Ohana Volleyball 12-Blue 1351 1-4 20% 12 TX
36324 Stars 14-Red 1351 7-9 39% 14 ND
36325 CG 15-Blue 1351 0-7 0% 15 WA
36326 Iowa United 17-2 premier 1351 8-20 29% 17 IA
36327 TX Charm 11-1 1351 0-4 0% 11 TX
36328 Amarillo Xtreme 11-Volleyboltz 1351 8-16 33% 11 TX
36329 Cascade 13 1351 22-38 35% 13 WA
36330 DuPage Elite 14 United 1351 18-43 30% 14 IL
36331 ClubOne 16 Silver 1351 20-23 47% 16 CO
36332 SAVAGES VC 14-1 1351 13-19 41% 14 TX
36333 Xcel VB 14-5 grey 1351 3-10 19% 14 TX
36334 La Grange VA 14-S 1351 4-8 33% 14 TX
36335 Schuylkill Eclipse 17-Solar 1351 1-4 20% 17 PA
36336 ROCK Volleyball 17-Sun 1351 10-31 24% 17 PA
36337 AV 13-2 1351 13-20 39% 13 MN
36338 Lake Country Storm 18 1351 9-10 47% 18 VA
36339 Boston United 14-Titanium 1351 13-13 50% 14 MA
36340 Gators VBC 18-Elite 1351 16-27 37% 18 OH
36341 IDAHO STORM 14-1 1351 4-10 29% 14 ID
36342 LEGACY 17-Elite alex 1351 17-35 33% 17 FL
36343 VCA 15 1351 7-12 35% 15 MD
36344 FTL 15-Atomic jonathan 1351 15-21 42% 15 FL
36345 X2 Volleyball 18-1 1351 17-22 44% 18 MA
36346 Aspire 13 1351 1-4 20% 13 OK
36347 Lex United TNT 12-Black 1351 10-19 34% 12 KY
36348 CT STARS 17-1 1351 0-7 0% 17 CT
36349 Top Notch 11-Black 1351 2-10 12% 11 MO
36350 CALI 15-Gold south 1351 10-24 29% 15 NY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.