Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 725 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
36201 BHJ 13-Black 1353 10-11 48% 13 SD
36202 TPV 17-Red 1353 17-25 40% 17 TN
36203 Peach City Volleyball Club 14 14U TEAL PCVC 1353 3-6 33% 14 AL
36204 UNITE 15-Mehdi 1353 0-7 0% 15 TN
36205 Amarillo Xtreme 13 Outlaws 1353 13-25 34% 13 TX
36206 Hot Shots 13-1 1353 3-5 38% 13 TX
36207 Hill Country Axis 13-Black 1353 13-23 36% 13 TX
36208 NYC Impact 16-Travel 1353 13-25 34% 16 NY
36209 Adventist Volleyball Club 14 Adventist VB- Pink (CE) 1353 0-4 0% 14 OR
36210 Stingray VBA 14-5 1353 4-6 40% 14 OK
36211 CJHEAT 16-2 1353 9-18 33% 16 NJ
36212 Storm 15-Regional purple 1353 4-4 50% 15 TX
36213 Dead Frog 12-Laney 1352 5-11 31% 12 MI
36214 DMV Volleyball Academy 18 1352 5-8 38% 18 VA
36215 417 MoJrs 16-Reg royal 1352 5-9 36% 16 MO
36216 Red Rock 13-Daniel - redwood city 1352 5-20 20% 13 CA
36217 HIC 14-R shay 1352 6-6 46% 14 UT
36218 Club UV 14 UV Crystal 1352 3-8 25% 14 UT
36219 OMNI 13 Power 1352 16-36 31% 13 CA
36220 Alliance Mboro 18-Black 1352 19-23 45% 18 TN
36221 Vernal Velocity 14-White 1352 4-12 24% 14 UT
36222 The St. James 16-White 1352 25-37 38% 16 VA
36223 TX Infinity 16-S red 1352 8-14 36% 16 TX
36224 CVC 12-Select 1352 8-22 27% 12 KY
36225 FCA Clark PDX 14-South 1352 9-13 41% 14 OR
36226 Spartans 16-Bravo 1352 12-28 30% 16 TX
36227 ENCORE 15-Premier red 1352 2-5 29% 15 CA
36228 AHAVA 18 1352 10-16 38% 18 TN
36229 CID 13-Black 1352 12-15 44% 13 ID
36230 Centennial CVA 14-2 kelly 1352 0-5 0% 14 IA
36231 Central Lakes 18-1 1352 5-14 26% 18 MN
36232 RTV 11-Rockets 1352 10-21 29% 11 IL
36233 Liberty 16-Reg'l blue 1352 1-6 10% 16 TX
36234 Bootheel SMASH 17 Mark 1352 8-13 33% 17 MO
36235 Lancers 13-Silver 1352 2-6 25% 13 IA
36236 River City Jrs 15-Silver 1352 13-15 46% 15 IA
36237 TOVC 16-Mulero 1352 2-4 33% 16 PR
36238 Kairos 16-Light 1352 3-9 25% 16 NC
36239 Cottage Grove 16-3 1352 5-8 38% 16 MN
36240 NEPA 16-Earthquakes 1352 6-14 27% 16 PA
36241 HVA Heat 12-Purple 1352 2-7 22% 12 LA
36242 WI Juniors 14-Blue 1352 20-22 48% 14 WI
36243 G2 14-Mango united 1352 2-5 29% 14 WA
36244 JJVA 13 Gold 1352 17-40 30% 13 FL
36245 Velocity Volleyball Club 17 U18 Velocity Volleyball (CA) (89) 1352 3-7 30% 17 AZ
36246 AVA 14-Platinum 1352 3-5 38% 14 PA
36247 GRIT 14-Black 1352 18-33 35% 14 CO
36248 Pursuit 11-Elite 1352 2-8 20% 11 MO
36249 WENTZVILLE HEAT 11-1 navy 1352 11-22 31% 11 MO
36250 Club Net 14-Regional plus 1352 13-19 41% 14 AR
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.