Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 716 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
35751 Mo Mighty Piranhas 12-1 1358 2-3 40% 12 MO
35752 Inferno 13 Lava 1358 9-16 35% 13 IL
35753 Wildfire 12-Olivia 1358 13-19 41% 12 FL
35754 Semo Attack 13 1358 8-18 30% 13 MO
35755 CJVA 14-Red 1358 12-19 39% 14 NJ
35756 Allegro 16-Scarlet 1358 17-25 40% 16 NJ
35757 PVC 15-White 1358 3-7 30% 15 OH
35758 EJVBC 14 Cedar 1358 18-24 43% 14 WA
35759 Low Country 14-Annie 1358 0-5 0% 14 SC
35760 Citrus Fusion 14 Lime 1358 10-13 43% 14 FL
35761 Raiders 12-Black 1358 1-4 20% 12 MN
35762 Iowa Juniors NEXT 14-Pink 1358 0-4 0% 14 IA
35763 LEGACY 14-Premier will 1358 17-29 37% 14 FL
35764 Club Fusion 13-Spark 1358 4-6 40% 13 IL
35765 Powers Volleyball Club 14-2 1358 11-20 35% 14 FL
35766 Miami Hype 14-Premier2 1358 22-24 48% 14 FL
35767 TEV 15-Kelsey / sydney 1358 14-15 48% 15 TN
35768 TMHPP TMH 13 1358 11-17 39% 13 CO
35769 360 17-Nat'l black 1358 1-4 20% 17 NV
35770 The Edge 12-White 1358 21-27 44% 12 CO
35771 CJVA 15-Diamond 1358 12-26 32% 15 NJ
35772 Exile 14 1358 4-8 31% 14 IA
35773 PAO Southside 14-Rda cwt 1358 21-27 44% 14 MO
35774 Nebraska ONE 12-Tnt 1357 7-7 50% 12 NE
35775 Centennial CVA 16-1 purdy 1357 0-5 0% 16 IA
35776 Arundel Aviators 16 Aviators-Fighting Falcons (CH) 1357 13-21 33% 16 MD
35777 Kimball 16U 1357 0-4 0% 16 MN
35778 Prime Time 12-Giraffes 1357 6-13 32% 12 IL
35779 Sky High Adidas 12-Silver 1357 14-27 34% 12 IL
35780 Impact 16-1 1357 17-31 35% 16 MN
35781 Vibranium 17-1 1357 13-18 42% 17 GA
35782 PDX VB 14-1 black 1357 9-19 32% 14 OR
35783 CCVC 16-1 1357 1-3 25% 16 WY
35784 Team Velocity 17-Black 1357 20-31 39% 17 CO
35785 Kansas Phantoms 12-1 1357 2-3 33% 12 KS
35786 Force 18 1357 0-4 0% 18 UT
35787 RENO 18 1357 13-19 41% 18 NV
35788 LAKERS 13-M 1357 0-4 0% 13 MI
35789 White Hawks 12-4 1357 1-5 17% 12 MN
35790 Windthorst 16-Vernon 1357 0-4 0% 16 TX
35791 Aces Elite 14-2 1357 10-16 38% 14 NV
35792 Supreme 14-1 1357 6-13 27% 14 MO
35793 NSSC 14-Black l 1357 14-21 40% 14 MO
35794 Cajun Elite 12 Layla 1357 8-19 27% 12 LA
35795 SJVC 13-2 1357 2-8 20% 13 FL
35796 Jax Skyline 13-White 1357 22-34 39% 13 FL
35797 Layne Volleyball 17-White 1357 5-9 36% 17 OH
35798 Chicago Elite 14 Air 1357 19-18 51% 14 IL
35799 WC Aces - 14-Clubs 1357 9-18 33% 14 IL
35800 Nassau Elite Volleyball Club 16 U16 Maroon 1357 4-5 44% 16 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.