Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 712 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
35551 Viper 18-Purple 1360 20-25 44% 18 RI
35552 WVC 11-Blue 1360 3-8 27% 11 MN
35553 KaBoom 16-S 1360 11-15 42% 16 MN
35554 South KC Juniors G18-2 1360 8-6 50% 18 KS
35555 SOSVBC 11-National 1360 0-5 0% 11 NY
35556 Inspire CLE 11-Sunrise 1360 4-10 29% 11 OH
35557 Metro 11-North 1360 6-13 27% 11 DC
35558 JSSA-VC 17-Kyle 1360 0-4 0% 17 NE
35559 K1 Bayamon 12 1360 0-10 0% 12 PR
35560 HPRIME 14-White 1360 7-13 33% 14 TX
35561 ESO 14-Premier 1360 5-10 33% 14 OH
35562 308 Elite VBC 10 1360 0-4 0% 10
35563 WI Juniors 10-Blue 1360 6-8 43% 10 WI
35564 A5 West 14-Dee 1360 8-13 38% 14 GA
35565 PIVC Storm 11 1360 0-5 0% 11 AL
35566 Bullitt 11-S 1360 1-4 20% 11 TX
35567 Shaka Juniors 14-Power 1360 19-27 41% 14 AL
35568 Intensity 13-Blue 1360 10-18 36% 13 MD
35569 MVA 14-Green 1360 5-13 28% 14 MD
35570 FTL 14-Nuclear t 1360 7-19 27% 14 FL
35571 SG Elite 16 Lightning 1360 11-16 41% 16 CA
35572 FORZA1 NORTH 16-Elite red 1360 13-21 38% 16 CA
35573 Power Up 12-1 1360 0-4 0% 12 IL
35574 Ohana 14-Lightening mcqueen 1360 1-4 20% 14 FL
35575 Windthorst 10 1360 0-4 0% 10 TX
35576 Ohana 15-Bing bong 1360 0-4 0% 15 FL
35577 ATTACK 12-2 1360 1-7 11% 12 ND
35578 Buckeye 14-Red elite 1360 11-24 31% 14 OH
35579 CHAOS GIRLS 17-National 1360 0-5 0% 17 HI
35580 CLUB STEEL 14-Silver 1360 22-23 49% 14 FL
35581 SJVC 14-4 1360 1-5 17% 14 FL
35582 SUPERIOR 11-Adidas 1360 7-18 24% 11 TX
35583 EP Elite 11-Teal 1360 6-13 30% 11 TX
35584 MoCo Jrs 11-Adidas 1360 3-9 20% 11 TX
35585 RVA 15-Megan 1360 2-3 40% 15 TN
35586 Weber Elite Volleyball Club 12 Weber Elite Bekah 1360 1-5 11% 12 UT
35587 LEGACY 11-Premier kamila 1360 10-21 32% 11 FL
35588 Apex 12-2 girls 1359 15-24 38% 12 SC
35589 LCVC 18-White 1359 9-13 41% 18 IN
35590 Munciana 14-L cougars blue 1359 5-10 33% 14 IN
35591 TVA Smack 15-Power 1359 4-9 31% 15 CA
35592 PVA 16-Black 1359 15-19 44% 16 SC
35593 Idaho ONE 13-Pink 1359 11-21 34% 13 ID
35594 Academy 14-R scorch 1359 16-28 36% 14 IN
35595 Valor-AR 14 Elite 1359 15-30 33% 14 AR
35596 UBVBC 18-1 1359 6-6 25% 18 NY
35597 Alliance 18-1 nashville 1359 1-4 20% 18 TN
35598 A5 Regional 18-Deanna 1359 16-16 50% 18 GA
35599 Lansing Volleyball 14 1359 1-6 10% 14 NY
35600 Lakes Region 15-1 1359 11-14 41% 15 NH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.