2025-2026 Season — Page 689 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34401 | Club 801 11-Club ashlea | 1372 | 5-8 | 33% | 11 | UT |
| 34402 | Coastal 18-2 national | 1372 | 22-27 | 43% | 18 | MA |
| 34403 | TVA Smack 16-Top tier | 1372 | 2-8 | 20% | 16 | CA |
| 34404 | KC Fire Volleyball 15-1 | 1372 | 6-8 | 29% | 15 | KS |
| 34405 | Sandy Aces 18-1 | 1372 | 4-8 | 33% | 18 | CA |
| 34406 | Club SyrV 16-Elite | 1372 | 24-34 | 40% | 16 | NY |
| 34407 | MATRIX 13-Regional | 1372 | 5-9 | 36% | 13 | AL |
| 34408 | HP 15-Nl onyx | 1372 | 17-18 | 49% | 15 | MI |
| 34409 | Rainier 17-Summit klhs | 1372 | 15-35 | 30% | 17 | WA |
| 34410 | WBVBC 18-2 jamie | 1372 | 9-11 | 45% | 18 | OH |
| 34411 | Starlings AV 17-Teal | 1372 | 11-17 | 39% | 17 | CA |
| 34412 | SPVC 12-Mikayka | 1372 | 5-11 | 31% | 12 | CA |
| 34413 | NE Shock 16-Flash | 1372 | 4-9 | 31% | 16 | CT |
| 34414 | Rise Elite VC 16-Leilani | 1372 | 3-8 | 27% | 16 | FL |
| 34415 | Winnerz Circle 16-3 | 1372 | 17-14 | 55% | 16 | FL |
| 34416 | AVA 16 | 1372 | 1-4 | 20% | 16 | FL |
| 34417 | Sunshine 11-Thunderstorms | 1372 | 14-25 | 36% | 11 | CA |
| 34418 | A5 South 16-Kristin | 1372 | 15-36 | 29% | 16 | GA |
| 34419 | 865VB 16-Black | 1372 | 17-18 | 49% | 16 | TN |
| 34420 | Kershaw Spark Volleyball Club 16 Kershaw Spark | 1372 | 3-6 | 33% | 16 | SC |
| 34421 | Gulfside 15-Elite | 1372 | 26-30 | 46% | 15 | FL |
| 34422 | DME American 16-2 | 1372 | 16-13 | 55% | 16 | FL |
| 34423 | WSRVC 14-Deschenes | 1372 | 2-8 | 20% | 14 | WY |
| 34424 | FCA Coastal Volleyball Club 15 U15 Hurricanes | 1372 | 9-15 | 38% | 15 | NC |
| 34425 | VOLT 14-Force | 1372 | 6-9 | 38% | 14 | ND |
| 34426 | Club Rampage Volleyball 14 Rampage Shayna | 1372 | 4-7 | 31% | 14 | UT |
| 34427 | NE D-League 12-Red | 1372 | 3-6 | 33% | 12 | IA |
| 34428 | Prairie 12 | 1372 | 1-7 | 13% | 12 | IA |
| 34429 | Boston United 17-Select 1 | 1372 | 16-15 | 52% | 17 | MA |
| 34430 | Holtville 12-Yvette | 1372 | 2-6 | 25% | 12 | CA |
| 34431 | MOJO Elite 14-Purple | 1372 | 19-26 | 40% | 14 | VA |
| 34432 | SI Wave 18-Black | 1372 | 16-18 | 47% | 18 | MO |
| 34433 | ACVC 15-Troy | 1372 | 2-5 | 29% | 15 | CA |
| 34434 | FoothillVBC 15-Blue | 1372 | 12-28 | 30% | 15 | CA |
| 34435 | Beach South 16-Red | 1372 | 8-17 | 32% | 16 | NC |
| 34436 | OVVC 14-Black | 1372 | 0-4 | 0% | 14 | OH |
| 34437 | Junior Mints 10-Orange | 1372 | 2-6 | 17% | 10 | TX |
| 34438 | Titanium 11-Navy | 1372 | 7-12 | 35% | 11 | MO |
| 34439 | RGV 11 | 1372 | 3-7 | 30% | 11 | TX |
| 34440 | COASTLINE 18-Black | 1372 | 11-14 | 44% | 18 | NC |
| 34441 | STRIVE 12-Blue | 1372 | 6-11 | 35% | 12 | IN |
| 34442 | Arabian Juniors 12-Green | 1372 | 6-12 | 33% | 12 | IN |
| 34443 | CSVC 12-2 | 1372 | 9-15 | 38% | 12 | IN |
| 34444 | Sierra Club 17 | 1372 | 10-17 | 37% | 17 | CO |
| 34445 | Diamond Diggers VBC 14 | 1372 | 16-25 | 34% | 14 | MT |
| 34446 | Genesis 14 | 1372 | 1-4 | 20% | 14 | IA |
| 34447 | Velt VBC 14-Navy | 1372 | 1-7 | 11% | 14 | IA |
| 34448 | Elite 16 Select | 1372 | 4-6 | 40% | 16 | MO |
| 34449 | PVA 12-Tessa | 1372 | 4-8 | 33% | 12 | FL |
| 34450 | KC Voltage 17-2 | 1372 | 9-19 | 32% | 17 | MO |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.