Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 689 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
34401 Club 801 11-Club ashlea 1372 5-8 33% 11 UT
34402 Coastal 18-2 national 1372 22-27 43% 18 MA
34403 TVA Smack 16-Top tier 1372 2-8 20% 16 CA
34404 KC Fire Volleyball 15-1 1372 6-8 29% 15 KS
34405 Sandy Aces 18-1 1372 4-8 33% 18 CA
34406 Club SyrV 16-Elite 1372 24-34 40% 16 NY
34407 MATRIX 13-Regional 1372 5-9 36% 13 AL
34408 HP 15-Nl onyx 1372 17-18 49% 15 MI
34409 Rainier 17-Summit klhs 1372 15-35 30% 17 WA
34410 WBVBC 18-2 jamie 1372 9-11 45% 18 OH
34411 Starlings AV 17-Teal 1372 11-17 39% 17 CA
34412 SPVC 12-Mikayka 1372 5-11 31% 12 CA
34413 NE Shock 16-Flash 1372 4-9 31% 16 CT
34414 Rise Elite VC 16-Leilani 1372 3-8 27% 16 FL
34415 Winnerz Circle 16-3 1372 17-14 55% 16 FL
34416 AVA 16 1372 1-4 20% 16 FL
34417 Sunshine 11-Thunderstorms 1372 14-25 36% 11 CA
34418 A5 South 16-Kristin 1372 15-36 29% 16 GA
34419 865VB 16-Black 1372 17-18 49% 16 TN
34420 Kershaw Spark Volleyball Club 16 Kershaw Spark 1372 3-6 33% 16 SC
34421 Gulfside 15-Elite 1372 26-30 46% 15 FL
34422 DME American 16-2 1372 16-13 55% 16 FL
34423 WSRVC 14-Deschenes 1372 2-8 20% 14 WY
34424 FCA Coastal Volleyball Club 15 U15 Hurricanes 1372 9-15 38% 15 NC
34425 VOLT 14-Force 1372 6-9 38% 14 ND
34426 Club Rampage Volleyball 14 Rampage Shayna 1372 4-7 31% 14 UT
34427 NE D-League 12-Red 1372 3-6 33% 12 IA
34428 Prairie 12 1372 1-7 13% 12 IA
34429 Boston United 17-Select 1 1372 16-15 52% 17 MA
34430 Holtville 12-Yvette 1372 2-6 25% 12 CA
34431 MOJO Elite 14-Purple 1372 19-26 40% 14 VA
34432 SI Wave 18-Black 1372 16-18 47% 18 MO
34433 ACVC 15-Troy 1372 2-5 29% 15 CA
34434 FoothillVBC 15-Blue 1372 12-28 30% 15 CA
34435 Beach South 16-Red 1372 8-17 32% 16 NC
34436 OVVC 14-Black 1372 0-4 0% 14 OH
34437 Junior Mints 10-Orange 1372 2-6 17% 10 TX
34438 Titanium 11-Navy 1372 7-12 35% 11 MO
34439 RGV 11 1372 3-7 30% 11 TX
34440 COASTLINE 18-Black 1372 11-14 44% 18 NC
34441 STRIVE 12-Blue 1372 6-11 35% 12 IN
34442 Arabian Juniors 12-Green 1372 6-12 33% 12 IN
34443 CSVC 12-2 1372 9-15 38% 12 IN
34444 Sierra Club 17 1372 10-17 37% 17 CO
34445 Diamond Diggers VBC 14 1372 16-25 34% 14 MT
34446 Genesis 14 1372 1-4 20% 14 IA
34447 Velt VBC 14-Navy 1372 1-7 11% 14 IA
34448 Elite 16 Select 1372 4-6 40% 16 MO
34449 PVA 12-Tessa 1372 4-8 33% 12 FL
34450 KC Voltage 17-2 1372 9-19 32% 17 MO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.