2025-2026 Season — Page 673 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33601 | JCC JRs 16-S | 1381 | 3-5 | 38% | 16 | MN |
| 33602 | Hammerhead 16-White | 1381 | 9-14 | 39% | 16 | MN |
| 33603 | NSTAR 16-1 | 1381 | 6-12 | 33% | 16 | MN |
| 33604 | Texas Fury 16-Unite | 1381 | 15-26 | 36% | 16 | TX |
| 33605 | Tx Evolution 16-Blue | 1381 | 8-12 | 40% | 16 | TX |
| 33606 | FTL 15-Nuclear jb | 1381 | 9-14 | 39% | 15 | FL |
| 33607 | Dolphin VBC 14-Black | 1381 | 10-14 | 42% | 14 | AL |
| 33608 | 850 Elite Volleyball Club 14-2 | 1381 | 13-24 | 35% | 14 | AL |
| 33609 | Queen City Starlings 16 QCS-MATTHEWS-RED (CR) | 1381 | 1-4 | 20% | 16 | NC |
| 33610 | Piedmont VBC 16-Vapor | 1381 | 3-13 | 19% | 16 | NC |
| 33611 | Maverick 15 Silver | 1380 | 2-6 | 25% | 15 | OH |
| 33612 | Renaissance 15-White | 1380 | 3-6 | 33% | 15 | OH |
| 33613 | p25 15-Quantum | 1380 | 22-30 | 42% | 15 | OH |
| 33614 | Aspire 17-2 pink | 1380 | 13-26 | 33% | 17 | AB |
| 33615 | New Haven Juniors 18-1 | 1380 | 18-20 | 45% | 18 | CT |
| 33616 | OTH 14-2 | 1380 | 0-4 | 0% | 14 | FL |
| 33617 | VIPERS 14 PREMIER | 1380 | 16-19 | 46% | 14 | FL |
| 33618 | Jtown Juniors 15-White | 1380 | 10-16 | 38% | 15 | AR |
| 33619 | West Bend Jr's 12-Select | 1380 | 71-82 | 46% | 12 | WI |
| 33620 | AEV 11 Club | 1380 | 8-14 | 36% | 11 | TX |
| 33621 | SKC 16-Blue | 1380 | 1-4 | 20% | 16 | KS |
| 33622 | STARLINGSNVBC 16 | 1380 | 1-4 | 20% | 16 | |
| 33623 | Red Storm 10-S black | 1380 | 1-3 | 25% | 10 | LA |
| 33624 | Big Cat 18-Purple | 1380 | 1-4 | 20% | 18 | IA |
| 33625 | Criollas 16-2 | 1380 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | PR |
| 33626 | Roseville JO 14-2 | 1380 | 5-7 | 42% | 14 | MN |
| 33627 | SWVA Elite 16-Becky | 1380 | 8-15 | 35% | 16 | VA |
| 33628 | NVA 17-White | 1380 | 16-38 | 30% | 17 | PA |
| 33629 | GVA 11-Orange | 1380 | 3-9 | 25% | 11 | PR |
| 33630 | Atomic Force 13-1 | 1380 | 0-4 | 0% | 13 | MN |
| 33631 | OVA 15-Ginger | 1380 | 5-10 | 33% | 15 | CA |
| 33632 | UVA 15-Regional | 1380 | 10-15 | 40% | 15 | CA |
| 33633 | NKJV 13-White | 1380 | 11-19 | 37% | 13 | KY |
| 33634 | Prodigy 13-White | 1380 | 21-27 | 44% | 13 | KY |
| 33635 | Club Gemini 17-Ice | 1380 | 21-26 | 45% | 17 | MO |
| 33636 | Flatlands 16-Blue | 1380 | 0-4 | 0% | 16 | OH |
| 33637 | Club Neo 17 NEO 17'S | 1380 | 8-13 | 38% | 17 | OK |
| 33638 | Rival 18-White | 1380 | 4-7 | 36% | 18 | NY |
| 33639 | Highland Lakes Aces 15U | 1380 | 6-12 | 33% | 15 | TX |
| 33640 | MWM 17 | 1380 | 7-10 | 41% | 17 | IL |
| 33641 | Iowa Alliance 17-Pink | 1380 | 2-6 | 22% | 17 | IA |
| 33642 | SVBC Spirit 17-Elite | 1380 | 0-5 | 0% | 17 | IA |
| 33643 | RC308 18-1 | 1380 | 0-3 | 0% | 18 | PA |
| 33644 | TX Ultimate 15-Blue | 1380 | 5-8 | 33% | 15 | TX |
| 33645 | L2 Volleyball Club 16 L2 264 (LK) | 1380 | 22-16 | 58% | 16 | MI |
| 33646 | Hi Bred VBC 13-2 | 1380 | 6-7 | 46% | 13 | HI |
| 33647 | Trinity Orioles 10 | 1380 | 2-5 | 25% | 10 | IA |
| 33648 | Idaho Show 18-Regional vanderkooy | 1380 | 15-20 | 43% | 18 | ID |
| 33649 | Oly Reign 13-2 | 1380 | 2-6 | 25% | 13 | WA |
| 33650 | Premier VBC 15-Red | 1380 | 26-28 | 48% | 15 | CO |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.