Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 673 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
33601 JCC JRs 16-S 1381 3-5 38% 16 MN
33602 Hammerhead 16-White 1381 9-14 39% 16 MN
33603 NSTAR 16-1 1381 6-12 33% 16 MN
33604 Texas Fury 16-Unite 1381 15-26 36% 16 TX
33605 Tx Evolution 16-Blue 1381 8-12 40% 16 TX
33606 FTL 15-Nuclear jb 1381 9-14 39% 15 FL
33607 Dolphin VBC 14-Black 1381 10-14 42% 14 AL
33608 850 Elite Volleyball Club 14-2 1381 13-24 35% 14 AL
33609 Queen City Starlings 16 QCS-MATTHEWS-RED (CR) 1381 1-4 20% 16 NC
33610 Piedmont VBC 16-Vapor 1381 3-13 19% 16 NC
33611 Maverick 15 Silver 1380 2-6 25% 15 OH
33612 Renaissance 15-White 1380 3-6 33% 15 OH
33613 p25 15-Quantum 1380 22-30 42% 15 OH
33614 Aspire 17-2 pink 1380 13-26 33% 17 AB
33615 New Haven Juniors 18-1 1380 18-20 45% 18 CT
33616 OTH 14-2 1380 0-4 0% 14 FL
33617 VIPERS 14 PREMIER 1380 16-19 46% 14 FL
33618 Jtown Juniors 15-White 1380 10-16 38% 15 AR
33619 West Bend Jr's 12-Select 1380 71-82 46% 12 WI
33620 AEV 11 Club 1380 8-14 36% 11 TX
33621 SKC 16-Blue 1380 1-4 20% 16 KS
33622 STARLINGSNVBC 16 1380 1-4 20% 16
33623 Red Storm 10-S black 1380 1-3 25% 10 LA
33624 Big Cat 18-Purple 1380 1-4 20% 18 IA
33625 Criollas 16-2 1380 2-3 40% 16 PR
33626 Roseville JO 14-2 1380 5-7 42% 14 MN
33627 SWVA Elite 16-Becky 1380 8-15 35% 16 VA
33628 NVA 17-White 1380 16-38 30% 17 PA
33629 GVA 11-Orange 1380 3-9 25% 11 PR
33630 Atomic Force 13-1 1380 0-4 0% 13 MN
33631 OVA 15-Ginger 1380 5-10 33% 15 CA
33632 UVA 15-Regional 1380 10-15 40% 15 CA
33633 NKJV 13-White 1380 11-19 37% 13 KY
33634 Prodigy 13-White 1380 21-27 44% 13 KY
33635 Club Gemini 17-Ice 1380 21-26 45% 17 MO
33636 Flatlands 16-Blue 1380 0-4 0% 16 OH
33637 Club Neo 17 NEO 17'S 1380 8-13 38% 17 OK
33638 Rival 18-White 1380 4-7 36% 18 NY
33639 Highland Lakes Aces 15U 1380 6-12 33% 15 TX
33640 MWM 17 1380 7-10 41% 17 IL
33641 Iowa Alliance 17-Pink 1380 2-6 22% 17 IA
33642 SVBC Spirit 17-Elite 1380 0-5 0% 17 IA
33643 RC308 18-1 1380 0-3 0% 18 PA
33644 TX Ultimate 15-Blue 1380 5-8 33% 15 TX
33645 L2 Volleyball Club 16 L2 264 (LK) 1380 22-16 58% 16 MI
33646 Hi Bred VBC 13-2 1380 6-7 46% 13 HI
33647 Trinity Orioles 10 1380 2-5 25% 10 IA
33648 Idaho Show 18-Regional vanderkooy 1380 15-20 43% 18 ID
33649 Oly Reign 13-2 1380 2-6 25% 13 WA
33650 Premier VBC 15-Red 1380 26-28 48% 15 CO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.