Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 637 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
31801 OVA 12-G region 1398 10-11 48% 12 AZ
31802 Chicago Red Stars 15 Red Stars Windy City 1398 12-20 36% 15 IL
31803 Ignite Elite Volleyball 12-Elite 1398 6-16 27% 12 IN
31804 NORCO 13-Silver 1398 13-19 41% 13 CO
31805 Starlings 18-Pink 1398 1-4 20% 18 NE
31806 SP2VC 16-Blue 1398 15-22 41% 16 NC
31807 Sizzle Academy 14-N1 1398 26-23 53% 14 AZ
31808 H2 14-Illinois warren 1398 17-24 40% 14 MO
31809 AP 17-Lite highlighter 1398 7-10 39% 17 TX
31810 SA Force 14 Teal 1398 10-17 34% 14 TX
31811 Lomanview 12-Omar 1398 4-7 36% 12 PR
31812 SA MAGIC 13 PREMIER 1398 15-35 30% 13 TX
31813 EMV 13-Metro white chalic 1398 4-6 31% 13 TX
31814 ACESZ 15-Silver 1398 8-8 50% 15 MI
31815 VEVA 14 Premier 1398 18-17 51% 14 FL
31816 RVC 12-Black 1398 16-28 34% 12 TX
31817 FC United 10-Black 1398 7-7 47% 10 MO
31818 NYC Volley Verse SI 15 1398 5-7 42% 15 NY
31819 GCVC 11-Red 1398 3-7 30% 11 OH
31820 Club Neo 15 NEO 15'S 1398 7-8 47% 15 OK
31821 STORM 17-Jen 1398 9-18 33% 17 CA
31822 SCV Galaxy 15-1 1398 9-9 50% 15 WI
31823 Max Performance 14-Linds/avery 1398 7-9 41% 14 MA
31824 H Hawks HHVBC Stingers 11 1398 1-4 20% 11 IA
31825 Meraki VB 16-2 1398 14-19 40% 16 NH
31826 DaKine 16-National navy 1398 23-35 40% 16 WA
31827 MiElite 14-Nicole east 1398 7-10 29% 14 MI
31828 VC United 17-5 premier 1398 8-8 50% 17 IL
31829 RAGE 13-2 1398 10-18 36% 13 WI
31830 Goldfish 14-Orange 1398 0-3 0% 14 CO
31831 Thrive 14-Teal 1398 13-22 37% 14 CA
31832 CVC Madasen 15 1398 0-3 0% 15 AL
31833 The Edge 16 Maroon (GL) 1398 14-21 40% 16 IL
31834 SVE 16-2 elite 1398 2-6 25% 16 MN
31835 Allegheny Volleyball Club 17-Black 1398 6-13 32% 17 PA
31836 FORZA1 NORTH 14-Elite black 1398 11-16 41% 14 CA
31837 Borderline 13-Hawks 1398 5-6 45% 13 OH
31838 Rapids 17-17-1 1398 17-20 46% 17 VA
31839 Xcel 15-Elite blue 1398 16-37 30% 15 NC
31840 ROX 15 1398 12-16 43% 15 NC
31841 CVC 15-Elite 1398 14-23 38% 15 KY
31842 CPVB 16-Select white 1398 13-16 42% 16 CT
31843 JSSA-VC 14-Bri 1398 0-3 0% 14 NE
31844 NASA BHM 13-BLACK 1398 15-24 38% 13 AL
31845 Club 801 15-Club shelby 1398 15-13 44% 15 UT
31846 EP STRiVE VBC 18-S black 1398 11-25 31% 18 TX
31847 Vibe 15-A 1398 9-19 30% 15 VT
31848 ROX 14-2 1398 2-3 40% 14 NC
31849 Momentum 18-1 1398 3-6 33% 18 IN
31850 Storm 15-Purple 1398 28-35 39% 15 CO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.