Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 619 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
30901 MOVA UA 15-Grey 1407 18-25 38% 15 MO
30902 MOVA UA 13-Black 1407 18-26 38% 13 MO
30903 MMP 17-1 1407 12-20 38% 17 MO
30904 VELOCITY VBC 10 1407 5-8 38% 10 AZ
30905 HAVC 15-W blue 1407 2-3 40% 15 SD
30906 Roseville Juniors 14-2 1407 4-6 40% 14 MN
30907 TX Legends 11-Black 1407 8-12 40% 11 TX
30908 MVC Panthers 11-Black 1407 9-13 41% 11 IL
30909 G3 11-Premier 1407 10-11 42% 11 MO
30910 Rapid Fire 15-White 1407 14-19 42% 15 IL
30911 Summit Surge 12-1 1407 8-10 44% 12 TN
30912 Cypress Huskies 13 1407 10-12 45% 13 TX
30913 HOT 14-Elite 1407 13-16 45% 14 NY
30914 LRJ 15-Regional 1407 14-17 45% 15 AR
30915 Masters Volleyball Academy- Carolina's 13-2 1407 11-13 46% 13 SC
30916 Alliance 17-Energy 1407 17-16 47% 17 MA
30917 CSRA Heat 12-Black 1407 18-20 47% 12 GA
30918 RCVS 17-2 martin 1407 7-7 50% 17 PR
30919 407 11-Winter mini club 1407 5-5 50% 11 FL
30920 Tsunami 18-1e hollie 1407 18-16 53% 18 GA
30921 Lions SWest Prairie 17-2 1407 26-22 54% 17 IL
30922 LAVA Shack 11-Flame 1407 5-4 56% 11 CA
30923 Hunter's 14-Red c. kevin 1407 21-16 57% 14 FL
30924 SEU 17-N 1407 6-9 40% 17 FL
30925 KVA Pack 14-Ug tara 1406 1-6 14% 14
30926 Knightro 14 1406 9-8 53% 14 MN
30927 Colorado Roughriders 15-Green 1406 17-16 52% 15 CO
30928 Club 1 18-Royal 1406 19-18 51% 18 IL
30929 VoltageVB 12-Blue-eunice 1406 12-15 44% 12 FL
30930 A5 Calhoun 16-Navy 1406 13-13 50% 16 GA
30931 MIDTN 15-BLUE 1406 23-24 49% 15 TN
30932 Wisconsin Elite 15-Blue 1406 35-36 49% 15 WI
30933 TAV Houston 16 Royal 1406 23-24 48% 16 TX
30934 Texas Fury 17-East wilco 1406 14-15 48% 17 TX
30935 Kidron VBC CrawfordBowman 18 1406 8-9 47% 18 OH
30936 Roots 12-3 maple 1406 15-17 47% 12 TX
30937 Mizuno M1 15-Blk 1406 28-33 46% 15 MN
30938 Apex 14 Predators 1406 15-16 45% 14 IL
30939 Blue Ridge Volleyball Club 14-Blue 1406 18-22 45% 14 SC
30940 Impact 16-Purple 1406 9-11 45% 16 TX
30941 SEATTLE JRS 18 1406 20-24 45% 18 WA
30942 C1VB 14-Regional grvl 1406 14-18 44% 14 SC
30943 CJVA 14-White 1406 13-17 43% 14 NJ
30944 Illini Elite 14-Gold 1406 5-10 33% 14 IL
30945 Sanford Fargo 13-UA 1406 16-32 33% 13 MN
30946 TVA 14-Purple kaleigh 1406 2-4 33% 14 FL
30947 Be Elite 15 1406 8-18 31% 15 AR
30948 MSVB 16-R hannah/marissa 1406 4-11 27% 16 AK
30949 Quicksets 17 1406 6-16 27% 17 HI
30950 WS Reign VBC 14-1 1406 10-29 26% 14 WA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.