Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 612 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
30551 AP 15-Wilco black 1410 17-23 41% 15 TX
30552 Texas Coastal 15-Maroon 1410 2-3 40% 15 TX
30553 Dunes 15-Hs local 1410 2-4 33% 15 IN
30554 ZUMAZ 12-White 1410 4-8 33% 12 MN
30555 CCVB 17-2 1410 3-5 38% 17 IL
30556 Lady Raiders 17 1410 17-28 38% 17 IL
30557 PacWest 13-Travis 1410 18-16 53% 13 CA
30558 Platform 15-Pink 1410 7-17 23% 15 IA
30559 Arkansas Elite 11-3 1410 6-8 43% 11 AR
30560 Ft. Wayne VBC 16 Select 1410 13-14 48% 16 IN
30561 SCP 14-Arianna 1410 17-23 43% 14 SC
30562 Elite 12-Regional lori 1410 12-12 50% 12 FL
30563 NVA 18-Navy 1410 0-3 0% 18 NE
30564 Hammerin Hawks 16-1 1410 0-3 0% 16 IA
30565 Paynesville 14-S 1410 1-3 25% 14 MN
30566 417 MoJrs 18-Nat black 1410 13-19 41% 18 MO
30567 BVA 18-N janelle 1410 10-34 23% 18 FL
30568 Prime 17-Red 1410 11-11 46% 17 MO
30569 River City 17-Blue 1410 20-21 49% 17 WI
30570 LES 12-Cameron 1410 4-6 29% 12 AL
30571 Legends 13-1julio 1410 2-6 25% 13 PR
30572 STORM 15-Bree/stacie 1410 6-12 33% 15 CO
30573 Wisconsin Ice 12-Silver 1410 1-3 25% 12 WI
30574 913Athletics 14-2 1410 0-4 0% 14 KS
30575 NE Storm 17-Blizzard 1410 33-24 58% 17 MA
30576 Dunes 13-Gray 1410 8-7 53% 13 IN
30577 Revolution 15-Saraya 1410 17-23 43% 15 NC
30578 RRVBC 13-Triya 1410 19-16 54% 13 GA
30579 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 17-5 1410 9-8 45% 17 KS
30580 Madtown 16-Red 1410 5-4 56% 16 WI
30581 UNION 12-Ky grey 1410 19-26 42% 12 IN
30582 AVC Nebraska 16-Black 1410 2-5 29% 16 NE
30583 BCYVBWolfpack 15-Yellow 1410 0-5 0% 15 BC
30584 SAND Waves 12-S 1410 4-3 57% 12 CA
30585 MOVSelect 16-White 1410 7-8 47% 16 OH
30586 Queen City 14 Rockets 1410 2-4 29% 14 PA
30587 H Hurricanes 15 1410 1-4 20% 15 TX
30588 Cowley Select 17-1 1410 12-11 52% 17 KS
30589 NOH 14-Red 1410 4-8 33% 14 OH
30590 Hawaiian Time AZ Tuberose 14 1410 2-5 29% 14 CA
30591 EEVC 14-S gold 1410 11-25 31% 14 CA
30592 VVA 13-Xiong 1410 5-9 36% 13 CA
30593 208 13-Blue 1410 14-19 42% 13 ID
30594 NOVA Juniors 13-S gold 1410 6-9 40% 13 OH
30595 Black Swamp 13-3 1410 7-7 50% 13 OH
30596 Alliance 17-Turbo 1410 15-19 41% 17 MA
30597 TAV 13-Blue 1410 24-23 51% 13 IL
30598 TVA 13-Purple grace 1410 2-4 33% 13 FL
30599 Wranglers VBC 16-Lilly 1410 3-6 30% 16 MI
30600 CYDI 17-Blue 1410 14-14 50% 17 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.