Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 599 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
29901 LS Thunder 13-Blue 1417 4-7 29% 13
29902 VC Power VBC 17 VCP Green 1417 20-24 45% 17
29903 RAJO 14-S black 1417 1-3 25% 14 MN
29904 Oxford Hype Volleyball Club 16 Oxford Hype Blaze-1 1416 3-7 30% 16
29905 OYA 17-Prime 1416 12-20 38% 17 CA
29906 MWM 11 1416 9-11 38% 11 IL
29907 AZ EVJ 15-Black 1416 19-20 49% 15 AZ
29908 Selkirk Royals Girls Volleyball Club Black 14 1416 2-6 25% 14
29909 Powerwest Volleyball Club 15-Blue 1416 2-6 25% 15
29910 MORRISON 14 1416 74-70 51% 14 IN
29911 Ka Ulukoa 15-James 1416 2-6 25% 15 HI
29912 Synergy 13-Monsoon 1416 28-33 45% 13 PA
29913 InnovativeVC 14-1raymond 1416 6-10 38% 14 PR
29914 Boiler Jrs 14-1mii iron 1416 7-8 47% 14 IN
29915 MHVBC 15-1 1416 2-4 33% 15 CA
29916 RVC Smash 15 1416 64-103 36% 15 TX
29917 HJV 13-Adidas 1416 5-9 36% 13 TX
29918 A5 Volleyball Club 14 1416 1-4 20% 14 GA
29919 Solon Spartans 11-Orange 1416 2-4 33% 11 IA
29920 KVBC 10-S white 1416 1-3 25% 10 MN
29921 OneVA 12-2 1416 1-4 20% 12 KS
29922 A5 Gwinnett 16-Miranda 1416 10-10 50% 16 GA
29923 Lakeville North 12-Blk 1416 10-19 32% 12 MN
29924 Athletic Empire 15 1416 12-17 41% 15 TX
29925 Hermantown 12-S 1416 1-3 25% 12 MN
29926 MN Select 12-White 1416 15-12 56% 12 MN
29927 Apex 12-1 1416 2-5 29% 12 GA
29928 Minot Power 17 Minot Power (NO) (11) 1416 2-4 33% 17
29929 Sideout 13-Navy 1416 9-13 41% 13 FL
29930 Focus 17-Lizzie 1416 31-32 49% 17
29931 Domination 18-Bm 1416 15-17 47% 18 MI
29932 LBK 12-2 1416 1-3 25% 12 OH
29933 Idaho Show 15-1 1416 2-6 25% 15 ID
29934 AP 12-Lite atomic 1416 7-8 47% 12 TX
29935 DIG 12-A jordan 1416 0-2 0% 12 TX
29936 FaR Out 12-Grey 1416 22-19 54% 12 MI
29937 Evolve 16-Red 1416 16-24 40% 16 CA
29938 Surfside 16-Mb megan 1416 18-23 44% 16 CA
29939 Mineral Area 13-Impact 1416 1-3 25% 13 MO
29940 Monti Heat 12 1416 1-4 14% 12 IA
29941 Sunset West 11-Smashers 1416 1-3 25% 11 NE
29942 Matchbox 13-Gray 1416 3-6 33% 13 SD
29943 757 14-J lisa 1416 2-3 40% 14 VA
29944 LAV 18-Regional white 1416 16-22 42% 18 AL
29945 ACV 12-Black 1416 5-5 50% 12 IL
29946 OVVC 15-Blue 1416 11-13 46% 15 OH
29947 Hoosier Elite Dolphins 14-3 1416 29-28 51% 14 IN
29948 TDV 13-Elite 1416 20-23 47% 13 OH
29949 HPRIME 12-Green 1416 0-2 0% 12 TX
29950 Veritas 16-Raan 1416 18-23 44% 16 AL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.