Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 573 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
28601 Northside Out Chicago 12 1428 3-6 33% 12 IL
28602 Baseline 14 1428 1-2 33% 14 NY
28603 Carolina One 12 C1VB Juniors Easley 2 (PM) (13) 1428 2-4 33% 12 SC
28604 Rev 14-1 panthers 1428 20-38 34% 14 IN
28605 Westmoreland Elite 16-2 1428 3-5 38% 16 PA
28606 LCVC 15-Red 1428 10-16 38% 15 IN
28607 PVC 16-1 (CA) 1428 10-16 38% 16 CA
28608 Raiders 12-C 1428 13-20 39% 12 IN
28609 NPJ Seattle 15-Orange 1428 23-36 39% 15 WA
28610 Tstreet 14-April 1428 9-12 43% 14 CA
28611 Illini Elite 15-L teal 1428 15-16 48% 15 IL
28612 Waterford Wave 12-S 1428 7-10 41% 12 WI
28613 Iowa Rockets Prairie 15-Vbc 1428 2-3 40% 15 IA
28614 EC Volley 17 1428 0-2 0% 17 IA
28615 Red Rock 13-Hannah - campbell 1428 18-22 45% 13 CA
28616 BVB 17 1428 7-8 47% 17 MN
28617 JM 12-Pink 1428 0-2 0% 12 TX
28618 Dynamite 17-Nashaly 1428 32-33 49% 17 FL
28619 RCVC 12-N 1428 6-12 33% 12 TN
28620 UPONTOP 15-S national black 1428 16-23 41% 15 FL
28621 Miami Hype 13-Prep1 1428 19-19 50% 13 FL
28622 Cape Elite 13 Osmany 1428 14-15 48% 13 FL
28623 COAST 10-1 delaney/tod 1428 11-17 39% 10 CA
28624 ATLHEAT 10-1 1428 10-12 43% 10 GA
28625 FAUCONS WHITE 15 1428 2-5 29% 15 CT
28626 Tehachapi Starlings 17-S 1428 15-12 56% 17 CA
28627 NCA Elite 17-S 1428 5-5 50% 17 AR
28628 IMUA 15-Felipe 1428 16-18 47% 15 CA
28629 Legends 18-1 william 1428 2-4 33% 18 PR
28630 Rainier 16-Summit oms 1428 20-29 41% 16 WA
28631 Conquest 15-Cougars 1428 11-11 50% 15 NJ
28632 TC ELITE 13-Randy 1428 2-4 33% 13 LA
28633 MiElite 13-Ns west 1428 18-19 49% 13 MI
28634 CVC 11-1 1428 18-15 55% 11 AL
28635 Intensity 17 Eclipse 1428 27-23 54% 17 MD
28636 NW Force 13-1 1428 6-7 46% 13 MO
28637 Athlete HQ 15-Brown 1428 17-21 45% 15 OH
28638 ESO 15-Prime 1428 8-6 57% 15 OH
28639 Summit Volleyball Club 12-2 1428 3-2 60% 12 MO
28640 NE Top Flight 13-Blue 1428 1-3 25% 13 NE
28641 BLACK 15-Chaos 1428 22-25 47% 15 OK
28642 Fusion 16-White 1428 33-37 47% 16 PA
28643 NEPA ELITE 15-Lightning 1428 11-16 38% 15 PA
28644 Lakeville South 12-Gold 1428 11-16 41% 12 MN
28645 MVP 14-Regional black 1428 8-11 35% 14 TX
28646 South County 15-White 1428 22-20 52% 15 RI
28647 FTL 11-Atomic j 1428 7-7 50% 11 FL
28648 LVC 13 1428 4-4 50% 13 WY
28649 PEVC 15-Chelsie 1428 13-17 43% 15 SC
28650 Edge Volleyball Club 14-1 1428 4-7 36% 14 TN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.