Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 565 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
28201 Club 217 13-Kasey 1432 10-10 50% 13 IL
28202 Gorge Jrs 14-2 1432 11-11 50% 14 OR
28203 Surge 12-S 1432 1-3 25% 12 LA
28204 RIV 16-Blue 1432 7-8 47% 16 WY
28205 YVA 16-B 1432 2-3 40% 16 WY
28206 SA Empire 13 Select 1432 8-10 44% 13 TX
28207 AP 13-Wilco lite white 1432 8-8 50% 13 TX
28208 WF Elite 13-Red 1432 2-4 22% 13 TX
28209 Rhythm 15 Regional 1432 13-18 37% 15 TN
28210 Wisconsin Blaze 16-Red 1432 18-21 46% 16 WI
28211 SCENIC CITY 13-National 1432 25-29 46% 13 TN
28212 FPVC 15-Ren 2 1432 13-20 39% 15 CA
28213 FCE 11-1 1432 5-10 33% 11 FL
28214 Silverton Bearcats 16-2 1432 22-21 51% 16 OR
28215 HOU STARS 14-White 1432 9-6 60% 14 TX
28216 Potlatch Timber Volleyball Club U16 1432 9-14 39% 16 WA
28217 Black Rock Sher 12 1432 14-15 42% 12 UT
28218 LBK 12-4 1432 4-6 40% 12 OH
28219 Capitals 15-National 1432 25-31 45% 15 NJ
28220 Top Tier VC 15 Select 1432 23-33 41% 15 NJ
28221 Bubbles United 16-Pearson 1432 2-3 40% 16 FL
28222 516 Elite 13-Regional-1 1432 1-10 9% 13 NY
28223 Va Wave 16 Surge 1432 27-28 49% 16 VA
28224 RCVC 16 N 1432 9-15 38% 16 TN
28225 Dig This! VBC 12-Pink 1432 2-4 33% 12 NV
28226 Prodigy 17-2 premier 1432 27-32 46% 17 NY
28227 Milwaukee Jr's 10-Silver 1432 7-6 50% 10 WI
28228 WVBA 16-Elite black 1432 26-23 53% 16 FL
28229 CLUB LEGACY 12-Bravo 1432 7-12 37% 12 NE
28230 AV 13-1 1432 15-22 38% 13 MN
28231 Country Fire 10 1432 4-5 36% 10 TX
28232 NRG 10-Bolt navy 1432 5-11 26% 10 TX
28233 Petite Elite 10 Ella 1432 2-8 13% 10 TX
28234 FIEL 12 TURQUESA 1432 4-3 57% 12 MX
28235 Impact 13-Amandab 1432 12-10 55% 13 MI
28236 Top Gun 13-Black 1432 3-4 33% 13 MI
28237 Renaissance 13-Red cran 1431 2-3 40% 13 OH
28238 Dayton Jrs 12-Gold 1431 3-7 30% 12 OH
28239 PAEVA 16-White 1431 9-11 45% 16 PA
28240 shockwave reading 16-2 1431 7-8 47% 16 PA
28241 Club Velocity YDT 12-Blue 1431 4-5 44% 12 MN
28242 FH 14-2 alaka'i bailey 1431 14-22 29% 14 TX
28243 China spring select squads 14 China Spring Select Squads (LS) (10) 1431 0-2 0% 14 TX
28244 Flyers 14-Nat-nichole 1431 15-26 33% 14 TX
28245 Areté 14-Steel ethos 1431 19-31 35% 14 TX
28246 RHVC 13-1 1431 15-20 43% 13 KY
28247 GALVESTON VC 14-Prime 1431 7-6 54% 14 TX
28248 NWE 16-1 1431 9-15 38% 16 OR
28249 NPJ Portland 16-Orange 1431 33-28 54% 16 OR
28250 Rev 13-2 wolves 1431 15-23 39% 13 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.