2025-2026 Season — Page 561 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28001 | ZTV 10-1 diamond | 1433 | 3-5 | 33% | 10 | MT |
| 28002 | Fusion 13-Maygen | 1433 | 0-3 | 0% | 13 | UT |
| 28003 | Mineral Area 17-Impact | 1433 | 4-4 | 50% | 17 | MO |
| 28004 | SEVC 17-National | 1433 | 20-29 | 41% | 17 | WA |
| 28005 | adidas Legacy Jrs 13-1 | 1433 | 2-7 | 20% | 13 | MO |
| 28006 | McAllen PREMIER 13-Nemo | 1433 | 7-13 | 35% | 13 | TX |
| 28007 | SVA 17 Ambush | 1433 | 35-33 | 51% | 17 | AZ |
| 28008 | Phoenix 16-1 | 1433 | 0-7 | 0% | 16 | ON |
| 28009 | RJSPT 13-2 | 1433 | 2-5 | 29% | 13 | NY |
| 28010 | 308 Elite VBC 16 | 1433 | 1-8 | 11% | 16 | |
| 28011 | Attack 10-Blue | 1433 | 3-4 | 33% | 10 | IL |
| 28012 | FIVA 14 | 1433 | 3-3 | 50% | 14 | FL |
| 28013 | Saints VC 10-1 | 1433 | 1-3 | 20% | 10 | MO |
| 28014 | Tribe 15-Border | 1433 | 5-9 | 36% | 15 | OH |
| 28015 | SECC Rebels VBA 11-2 | 1433 | 1-3 | 25% | 11 | MA |
| 28016 | Stars & Spikes 14-Red | 1433 | 4-6 | 40% | 14 | IN |
| 28017 | Alexandria Titans 18-1 | 1433 | 11-9 | 55% | 18 | VA |
| 28018 | Dig It VBC 14-2 | 1433 | 25-23 | 51% | 14 | IL |
| 28019 | Inferno 14 Magma | 1433 | 16-10 | 59% | 14 | IL |
| 28020 | Intensity 12-Black | 1433 | 10-14 | 34% | 12 | MD |
| 28021 | XP 12-Spring black | 1433 | 1-2 | 25% | 12 | IL |
| 28022 | Train4F 12-1 | 1433 | 1-3 | 25% | 12 | OH |
| 28023 | Club Focus 12 FOCUS STOYANOVICH | 1433 | 5-6 | 45% | 12 | OH |
| 28024 | SOVC Tracey 12-R | 1433 | 0-4 | 0% | 12 | OH |
| 28025 | RVC 13-Grind | 1433 | 24-22 | 52% | 13 | CO |
| 28026 | Prodigy 13-2 club | 1433 | 6-4 | 60% | 13 | NY |
| 28027 | Lanier 16-Regional ted | 1433 | 21-13 | 60% | 16 | GA |
| 28028 | Kingdom KC Volleyball Club 16-1 | 1433 | 6-6 | 50% | 16 | MO |
| 28029 | BAVC 12-Blue | 1433 | 11-11 | 50% | 12 | IL |
| 28030 | EMV 14-Black erin w | 1433 | 6-13 | 32% | 14 | TX |
| 28031 | CTX Regulators 14 | 1433 | 11-7 | 61% | 14 | TX |
| 28032 | Allegiance 14-2 liberty | 1433 | 8-9 | 42% | 14 | TX |
| 28033 | NIVB 14-Purple | 1433 | 13-17 | 43% | 14 | MN |
| 28034 | CVC 17-1 | 1433 | 14-18 | 44% | 17 | MN |
| 28035 | KSA 13-Blue | 1433 | 16-19 | 46% | 13 | KY |
| 28036 | Legacy KY 13-Black | 1433 | 32-44 | 42% | 13 | KY |
| 28037 | MVC 14-Green | 1433 | 16-17 | 48% | 14 | LA |
| 28038 | Michio Chicago 12-Dodgers | 1433 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | IL |
| 28039 | SUVA 10-1 | 1433 | 1-3 | 25% | 10 | OH |
| 28040 | Boiler Jrs 11-R black | 1433 | 16-21 | 43% | 11 | IN |
| 28041 | Paris Crush 14 | 1433 | 13-9 | 59% | 14 | KY |
| 28042 | Crossfire Volleyball 12-1 | 1433 | 9-13 | 41% | 12 | MN |
| 28043 | Midwest Juniors 13-2 | 1433 | 2-3 | 40% | 13 | KS |
| 28044 | Momentum Volleyball 11-Enrique | 1433 | 13-17 | 43% | 11 | CO |
| 28045 | Champion 14-R white | 1433 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | NC |
| 28046 | Upstate 14 Hope | 1433 | 11-12 | 48% | 14 | SC |
| 28047 | SVA 12-Red 2026 | 1433 | 0-2 | 0% | 12 | MN |
| 28048 | BoCo VAC 16-2 | 1433 | 5-10 | 33% | 16 | CO |
| 28049 | Max Performance 18-Blue | 1433 | 17-20 | 46% | 18 | TX |
| 28050 | EVA 17 Navy | 1433 | 16-18 | 47% | 17 | AR |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.