2025-2026 Season — Page 538 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26851 | LBK 17-3 | 1444 | 10-9 | 53% | 17 | OH |
| 26852 | MVP 60450 15-Red | 1444 | 7-7 | 47% | 15 | IL |
| 26853 | Lions West 15-2 | 1444 | 25-19 | 57% | 15 | IL |
| 26854 | Madfrog 14-E black | 1444 | 12-26 | 28% | 14 | TX |
| 26855 | Summit 15-Orange elite | 1444 | 19-20 | 49% | 15 | IN |
| 26856 | Rockwood 10-Gold | 1444 | 1-3 | 25% | 10 | MO |
| 26857 | Club 1 SS 14 | 1444 | 1-2 | 33% | 14 | IL |
| 26858 | Apex Volleyball Academy 13 Apex Crow (OV) | 1444 | 4-5 | 44% | 13 | OH |
| 26859 | HOVA 13-A navy | 1444 | 9-11 | 45% | 13 | OH |
| 26860 | Maks 16-S | 1444 | 1-8 | 11% | 16 | ID |
| 26861 | Layne Volleyball 13-Black | 1444 | 2-3 | 40% | 13 | OH |
| 26862 | Platform 15-Silver | 1444 | 11-16 | 32% | 15 | IA |
| 26863 | Hunter's 11-White | 1444 | 5-4 | 56% | 11 | FL |
| 26864 | Little Waves 11-Teal | 1444 | 17-23 | 43% | 11 | FL |
| 26865 | SAV 11-Black | 1444 | 8-8 | 50% | 11 | FL |
| 26866 | Alpha Volleyball Academy 15-2 | 1444 | 6-5 | 50% | 15 | KS |
| 26867 | Actyve 16-Blue | 1444 | 15-20 | 43% | 16 | CA |
| 26868 | Club Fusion 17-2 national | 1444 | 1-5 | 17% | 17 | IL |
| 26869 | Illini Elite 18-L amber | 1444 | 4-4 | 50% | 18 | IL |
| 26870 | OT 11-O erick | 1444 | 12-14 | 46% | 11 | FL |
| 26871 | OWV 11-White | 1444 | 2-2 | 50% | 11 | FL |
| 26872 | Maine Jrs 14-Navy | 1444 | 7-12 | 32% | 14 | ME |
| 26873 | Vital 14-Gabby | 1444 | 4-6 | 40% | 14 | MI |
| 26874 | Atomic! 14-Michelle | 1444 | 0-2 | 0% | 14 | MI |
| 26875 | FaR Out 14 Crimson | 1444 | 27-17 | 61% | 14 | MI |
| 26876 | Crossfire VBC 14-Blaze | 1444 | 12-14 | 46% | 14 | WI |
| 26877 | ITVC 18-Power (HI) | 1444 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | CA |
| 26878 | Buckeye 12-Red american | 1444 | 10-14 | 42% | 12 | OH |
| 26879 | MATRIX 15-Olivia | 1444 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | CA |
| 26880 | Titan Select 15-Hanah | 1444 | 24-28 | 46% | 15 | CA |
| 26881 | Wolfpack 14 | 1444 | 1-3 | 25% | 14 | WA |
| 26882 | NWE 14-3 | 1444 | 2-6 | 25% | 14 | WA |
| 26883 | KCV 13-1 taelyn | 1444 | 2-3 | 40% | 13 | CA |
| 26884 | Black Rose 16U Red | 1444 | 4-7 | 36% | 16 | PA |
| 26885 | Alpha 18-1 | 1444 | 16-20 | 44% | 18 | KY |
| 26886 | AJV 13 Navy | 1444 | 18-24 | 43% | 13 | TX |
| 26887 | 314 VBC 14-Regional - kiick | 1444 | 4-5 | 40% | 14 | MO |
| 26888 | OK Elite 12-Blue | 1444 | 5-7 | 38% | 12 | OK |
| 26889 | Vienna Elite 18 Travel | 1444 | 22-40 | 33% | 18 | VA |
| 26890 | Creole Big Apple 17 | 1444 | 24-29 | 45% | 17 | NY |
| 26891 | Keahi 18-Purple | 1444 | 15-13 | 54% | 18 | UT |
| 26892 | IVC 17-Home | 1444 | 0-3 | 0% | 17 | AK |
| 26893 | ZVC 16-1 | 1444 | 3-4 | 43% | 16 | |
| 26894 | Surge 14-Lime | 1444 | 4-6 | 40% | 14 | PA |
| 26895 | Voltage 14-Coach tessa | 1444 | 4-5 | 36% | 14 | PA |
| 26896 | 2026 Nola Lauren/Tori 12 | 1444 | 16-32 | 31% | 12 | LA |
| 26897 | Lady Blue Indians 16 Blue Storm (XL) (12) | 1444 | 3-5 | 23% | 16 | NY |
| 26898 | A5 South 17-Ayla | 1444 | 30-39 | 43% | 17 | GA |
| 26899 | TFSC 17-Phoenix | 1444 | 2-5 | 29% | 17 | GA |
| 26900 | MJVA 12-3 | 1444 | 2-6 | 25% | 12 | GA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.