Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 465 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
23201 RVC VYVL 16-Lee 1477 3-2 60% 16
23202 Alliance 18-Matrix 1477 12-4 67% 18 MA
23203 Junior Mints 12-Grey 1477 4-4 33% 12 TX
23204 Xcel VB 10-Mb-x 1477 7-13 33% 10 TX
23205 FWFIRE 13-W 1477 10-11 38% 13 TX
23206 Club V 16-Raegan 1477 15-22 39% 16 UT
23207 Texas Tornados 16-National 1477 21-33 39% 16 TX
23208 Chi City 15-2 regional 1477 10-8 45% 15 IL
23209 NBVA 15-Power black 1477 13-14 45% 15 CA
23210 MJVA 13-Elite gold 1477 20-21 48% 13 TN
23211 SVC 13-Teal 2 1477 13-14 48% 13 FL
23212 Spa City 15-Coral 1477 19-17 49% 15 NY
23213 PVA 17-National peak 1477 28-29 49% 17 NY
23214 SoCal VBC 15-Moonlight 1477 18-19 49% 15 CA
23215 Legacy Elite VBA 13-E 1477 23-24 49% 13 OH
23216 P3R 17-Warhol 1477 10-9 53% 17 PA
23217 PIRATAS ADN 14-2 1476 8-8 50% 14 PR
23218 Bucaneras AVC 12 1476 6-4 60% 12 PR
23219 YVA 16-Emma 1476 17-12 59% 16 MT
23220 NYCLI Volleyball Club 16-Elite 1476 22-20 52% 16 NY
23221 NorthShore 16-Rudolph 1476 11-10 52% 16 OH
23222 CE Jennings 13-Savannah 1476 5-5 50% 13 LA
23223 The RIDGE 13-White 1476 9-9 50% 13 AR
23224 Vibe 13-Iza 1476 10-10 50% 13 GA
23225 APEX 15-Evolution 1476 20-23 47% 15 PA
23226 PVA 15 Jorge 1476 19-22 46% 15 FL
23227 Sportime 16-Silver 1476 19-22 46% 16 NY
23228 Valley United Volleyball LLC 15 Valley United Volleyball (OD) 1476 9-11 41% 15 VA
23229 Princeton Volleyball Club 13-2 1476 4-8 33% 13 NJ
23230 NIVA South 10-Meerkats 1476 1-2 33% 10 IN
23231 Legacy Elite VBA 10-Black 1476 3-6 33% 10 OH
23232 SpikeHers 16-Blue 1476 11-22 33% 16 NY
23233 Tyler Jrs 15 1476 13-5 62% 15
23234 Powerwest Volleyball Club 14-Blue 1476 4-4 50% 14
23235 Grimsby Volleyball Association 16 Vipers Verified 1476 3-3 50% 16
23236 Club Cactus 18-Silver 1476 20-27 43% 18 AZ
23237 Cangrejeras 13-Angel 1476 4-6 40% 13 PR
23238 KC Legends 13-1 1476 7-11 32% 13 MO
23239 Excel NW 16-3 silver 1476 20-19 51% 16 WA
23240 Va Wave 17 Tidal 1476 16-21 43% 17 VA
23241 River City 18 (EV) 1476 18-8 69% 18 WA
23242 Vibe 11-Kelly 1476 2-3 40% 11 GA
23243 PAO STL 17-Rda black 1476 38-27 58% 17 MO
23244 Adira 14-Lawrence 1476 17-14 52% 14 TN
23245 Cajun Elite 12-Hanna 1476 16-16 48% 12 LA
23246 Advantage 15-Silver 1476 13-11 54% 15 NC
23247 Clarksville VBC 12-2 1476 1-1 25% 12 TN
23248 Bemidji 12-Kelly 1476 4-3 50% 12 ND
23249 573 16-Regional t 1476 4-6 40% 16 MO
23250 CALI 16-Gold elite 1476 28-28 50% 16 NY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.