Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 445 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
22201 GLVBC 12-Blue 1486 4-2 67% 12 MI
22202 RRC Falcon Fire 16-S 1486 2-2 40% 16 MN
22203 Upontop 12-Tiffany 1486 6-6 50% 12 FL
22204 Red Rock 14-Ashia - alameda 1486 10-18 36% 14 CA
22205 FoothillVBC 14-Red 1486 20-20 50% 14 CA
22206 Empower Juniors 17-1 1486 18-9 67% 17 TX
22207 SVA 17-Ben 1486 12-14 46% 17 WA
22208 Michio Chicago 12-Premier 1486 11-8 58% 12 IL
22209 TW Skyline 14-Gray 1485 11-11 50% 14 TX
22210 COAST 13-R2 bella 1485 11-16 41% 13 CA
22211 Quicksets 14-1 1485 3-2 43% 14 HI
22212 KKVC 14-Sc - blue 1485 1-2 25% 14 SD
22213 El Paso Fury 13 EPFury Rising (SU) 1485 13-12 50% 13 TX
22214 HJV 13-Molten 1485 10-12 45% 13 TX
22215 Bootheel SMASH 11-G 1485 6-8 40% 11 MO
22216 FaR Out 15-White 1485 30-16 65% 15 MI
22217 UEPA 17-P 1485 9-19 32% 17 TX
22218 Adrenaline 12-Kd 1485 6-9 29% 12 IA
22219 Tuba City VBC 15-1 1485 16-24 40% 15 AZ
22220 LCVC 14-G 1 (NC) 1485 12-9 57% 14 CA
22221 Club Apex 16-Grey 1485 25-21 54% 16 KY
22222 Club Attack 18-Mandy 1485 12-9 57% 18
22223 Legends 14-1 1485 12-11 50% 14 NY
22224 Rise Volleyball Academy 13-1 1485 7-9 44% 13 WV
22225 Madras Volleyball Club 12-S 1485 5-3 63% 12 WA
22226 GRV 13-Black (LK) 1485 22-14 61% 13 MI
22227 QVA 11-Local 1485 13-9 59% 11 FL
22228 NKJV 11-Blue 1485 11-9 55% 11 KY
22229 WVBA 12 adidas 1485 28-37 43% 12 WA
22230 Rosebud Rebels 14-1 1485 12-12 44% 14 MT
22231 913Athletics 14-White 1485 11-13 46% 14 KS
22232 ST CLAIR CO VBC 13-Navy 1485 33-21 58% 13 MO
22233 Blue Royals 18-Diamond 1485 26-29 47% 18 WA
22234 NEVA 16-Nationals stech 1485 6-4 43% 16 UT
22235 Prime Time 14-Orange 1485 13-14 48% 14 IL
22236 Momentum 15-1 1485 2-3 40% 15 IN
22237 BCYVBWolfpack 18-Blue 1485 1-4 20% 18 BC
22238 XP 17-Elite 2 1485 28-29 49% 17 IL
22239 Topeka Saints 11-3 1485 3-1 75% 11 KS
22240 Columbia 12-Black 1485 34-35 49% 12 MD
22241 Drive Nation 15-White 1485 4-6 40% 15 TX
22242 Texas Tornados 15-Black 1485 13-10 57% 15 TX
22243 Oly Reign 12-Blue 1485 18-11 62% 12 WA
22244 ECVC 13-Regional pc - cheryl 1485 15-11 58% 13 AL
22245 Grit 13 1485 7-9 39% 13 AL
22246 RockCity 16-N3 1485 30-24 56% 16 OH
22247 Mana Toa 13-2 1485 3-2 60% 13 AL
22248 MiElite 12-Josie east 1485 28-16 56% 12 MI
22249 Chicago Premier VBC 13 13 Gold 1485 3-3 50% 13
22250 Horizon VBC 13 14 Half-Moon Rock (PR) 1485 2-3 40% 13 KY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.