2025-2026 Season — Page 430 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21451 | Image 14-Red | 1492 | 8-21 | 25% | 14 | |
| 21452 | Three Rivers Volleyball Club 15-Girls | 1492 | 5-3 | 63% | 15 | |
| 21453 | ELITE PRIMETIME 16-1 | 1492 | 22-16 | 56% | 16 | TX |
| 21454 | Roughriders 15-2 | 1492 | 4-4 | 50% | 15 | MA |
| 21455 | Spiketown Door County 16 | 1492 | 11-13 | 46% | 16 | WI |
| 21456 | High Voltage 15-2 | 1492 | 8-9 | 47% | 15 | MN |
| 21457 | Portland VBC 16-2 white | 1492 | 24-27 | 47% | 16 | OR |
| 21458 | GPVBC 13-1 | 1492 | 7-8 | 47% | 13 | OK |
| 21459 | Texas 512 13-Orange | 1492 | 19-21 | 48% | 13 | TX |
| 21460 | T4VBC 16 Premier | 1492 | 23-24 | 49% | 16 | TX |
| 21461 | Crushers 14-Black | 1492 | 24-25 | 49% | 14 | OR |
| 21462 | UNION 12-In white | 1492 | 22-23 | 49% | 12 | IN |
| 21463 | 808 AC 14-Kristen | 1492 | 20-20 | 50% | 14 | HI |
| 21464 | BCV 17-Shane | 1492 | 5-5 | 50% | 17 | CO |
| 21465 | Lineshot 11-Pink regional | 1492 | 3-3 | 50% | 11 | OH |
| 21466 | 573 15-Regional j | 1492 | 5-5 | 50% | 15 | MO |
| 21467 | LMVC 12-Nat erin | 1492 | 18-17 | 51% | 12 | SC |
| 21468 | ArkJrs 15-S mh | 1492 | 12-11 | 52% | 15 | AR |
| 21469 | SSWolfpack 15-Arcticwolves | 1492 | 11-8 | 52% | 15 | MA |
| 21470 | Tala 17-S national | 1492 | 14-12 | 52% | 17 | NV |
| 21471 | EAA 13 | 1492 | 14-13 | 52% | 13 | KY |
| 21472 | Stingray VBA 14-Select jm | 1492 | 16-15 | 52% | 14 | OK |
| 21473 | UVC 15-Mehdi/mackenzie | 1492 | 18-16 | 53% | 15 | CA |
| 21474 | Bravo 14-Juniper | 1492 | 21-17 | 55% | 14 | CA |
| 21475 | PREVA 16-Joshua | 1492 | 18-15 | 55% | 16 | PR |
| 21476 | Texas One 14-Cobalt | 1492 | 12-9 | 55% | 14 | TX |
| 21477 | Calcasieu Impact 12 | 1492 | 15-17 | 47% | 12 | LA |
| 21478 | Charge Volleyball Club 12-1 | 1492 | 4-2 | 67% | 12 | OK |
| 21479 | Starlings AV 14-Teal | 1492 | 12-6 | 67% | 14 | CA |
| 21480 | Top Flight 15 Sigma | 1492 | 39-20 | 66% | 15 | IL |
| 21481 | BORINQUEN COQUI 11-3f | 1492 | 11-6 | 65% | 11 | PR |
| 21482 | HVA 14-Pl blue | 1492 | 12-8 | 60% | 14 | TX |
| 21483 | Club 1 16-Blue | 1492 | 28-19 | 60% | 16 | IL |
| 21484 | WAVE 15 STINGRAY | 1492 | 39-26 | 60% | 15 | KY |
| 21485 | KCV 15-1 hannah | 1492 | 3-2 | 60% | 15 | CA |
| 21486 | LevelUp 12-Red | 1492 | 17-14 | 55% | 12 | MI |
| 21487 | ECC 17-South national | 1492 | 14-28 | 33% | 17 | NJ |
| 21488 | Black Hills Juniors NH 17-1 | 1492 | 6-12 | 33% | 17 | WY |
| 21489 | Saber VBC 14 | 1492 | 1-1 | 33% | 14 | IA |
| 21490 | GSA 13-1-johnitta | 1492 | 5-8 | 38% | 13 | CA |
| 21491 | MVA Sapphire 16-Black | 1492 | 10-9 | 40% | 16 | MT |
| 21492 | Tropical Touch 16-Sauia | 1492 | 27-19 | 59% | 16 | CA |
| 21493 | ELITE IMPACT 14 | 1492 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | TX |
| 21494 | BVCAL 12-Shak | 1492 | 2-2 | 40% | 12 | AL |
| 21495 | 360 13-1 | 1492 | 9-9 | 41% | 13 | TX |
| 21496 | 603 United 15-Seacoast white | 1492 | 14-19 | 42% | 15 | NH |
| 21497 | Apex Volleyball Club 15-Lightning | 1492 | 3-4 | 43% | 15 | MO |
| 21498 | 417 Juniors G13-1 | 1492 | 3-4 | 43% | 13 | MO |
| 21499 | VEVA 14 Elite | 1492 | 26-33 | 44% | 14 | FL |
| 21500 | OK Charge 12-American | 1492 | 15-18 | 45% | 12 | OK |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.