Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 430 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
21451 Image 14-Red 1492 8-21 25% 14
21452 Three Rivers Volleyball Club 15-Girls 1492 5-3 63% 15
21453 ELITE PRIMETIME 16-1 1492 22-16 56% 16 TX
21454 Roughriders 15-2 1492 4-4 50% 15 MA
21455 Spiketown Door County 16 1492 11-13 46% 16 WI
21456 High Voltage 15-2 1492 8-9 47% 15 MN
21457 Portland VBC 16-2 white 1492 24-27 47% 16 OR
21458 GPVBC 13-1 1492 7-8 47% 13 OK
21459 Texas 512 13-Orange 1492 19-21 48% 13 TX
21460 T4VBC 16 Premier 1492 23-24 49% 16 TX
21461 Crushers 14-Black 1492 24-25 49% 14 OR
21462 UNION 12-In white 1492 22-23 49% 12 IN
21463 808 AC 14-Kristen 1492 20-20 50% 14 HI
21464 BCV 17-Shane 1492 5-5 50% 17 CO
21465 Lineshot 11-Pink regional 1492 3-3 50% 11 OH
21466 573 15-Regional j 1492 5-5 50% 15 MO
21467 LMVC 12-Nat erin 1492 18-17 51% 12 SC
21468 ArkJrs 15-S mh 1492 12-11 52% 15 AR
21469 SSWolfpack 15-Arcticwolves 1492 11-8 52% 15 MA
21470 Tala 17-S national 1492 14-12 52% 17 NV
21471 EAA 13 1492 14-13 52% 13 KY
21472 Stingray VBA 14-Select jm 1492 16-15 52% 14 OK
21473 UVC 15-Mehdi/mackenzie 1492 18-16 53% 15 CA
21474 Bravo 14-Juniper 1492 21-17 55% 14 CA
21475 PREVA 16-Joshua 1492 18-15 55% 16 PR
21476 Texas One 14-Cobalt 1492 12-9 55% 14 TX
21477 Calcasieu Impact 12 1492 15-17 47% 12 LA
21478 Charge Volleyball Club 12-1 1492 4-2 67% 12 OK
21479 Starlings AV 14-Teal 1492 12-6 67% 14 CA
21480 Top Flight 15 Sigma 1492 39-20 66% 15 IL
21481 BORINQUEN COQUI 11-3f 1492 11-6 65% 11 PR
21482 HVA 14-Pl blue 1492 12-8 60% 14 TX
21483 Club 1 16-Blue 1492 28-19 60% 16 IL
21484 WAVE 15 STINGRAY 1492 39-26 60% 15 KY
21485 KCV 15-1 hannah 1492 3-2 60% 15 CA
21486 LevelUp 12-Red 1492 17-14 55% 12 MI
21487 ECC 17-South national 1492 14-28 33% 17 NJ
21488 Black Hills Juniors NH 17-1 1492 6-12 33% 17 WY
21489 Saber VBC 14 1492 1-1 33% 14 IA
21490 GSA 13-1-johnitta 1492 5-8 38% 13 CA
21491 MVA Sapphire 16-Black 1492 10-9 40% 16 MT
21492 Tropical Touch 16-Sauia 1492 27-19 59% 16 CA
21493 ELITE IMPACT 14 1492 2-3 40% 14 TX
21494 BVCAL 12-Shak 1492 2-2 40% 12 AL
21495 360 13-1 1492 9-9 41% 13 TX
21496 603 United 15-Seacoast white 1492 14-19 42% 15 NH
21497 Apex Volleyball Club 15-Lightning 1492 3-4 43% 15 MO
21498 417 Juniors G13-1 1492 3-4 43% 13 MO
21499 VEVA 14 Elite 1492 26-33 44% 14 FL
21500 OK Charge 12-American 1492 15-18 45% 12 OK
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.