Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 427 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
21301 3CVBC 13 Teal 1494 20-18 53% 13 TX
21302 Forge 16 1494 5-6 36% 16
21303 NVA 13-Future quesada 1494 13-11 54% 13 FL
21304 Wythe Elite 15-PINK 1494 14-11 56% 15 TN
21305 Atlanta Extreme 17 Jackie 1494 39-31 56% 17 GA
21306 AV 12-2 1494 10-8 56% 12 MN
21307 WSRVC 12-Schmidt 1494 20-15 57% 12 WY
21308 CCAVBC 14u 1494 20-15 57% 14 FL
21309 BoCo VAC 18-Black 1494 12-8 60% 18 CO
21310 Apex Volleyball Club G18-2 1494 3-2 60% 18 MO
21311 MEVC 16 American 1494 39-21 64% 16 MD
21312 Apex Volleyball Club 17-1 1494 2-2 33% 17 MO
21313 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 17-2 1494 1-3 25% 17 KS
21314 SERV 12 Impact 1494 18-20 47% 12 VA
21315 CIA 12-Black 1494 18-15 53% 12 IA
21316 Vista 14-Scroggs 1494 3-2 60% 14 CA
21317 Weber Elite 16 1494 2-2 50% 16 UT
21318 Sky High Adidas 14-Gray 1494 26-23 53% 14 IL
21319 Millennium 14-Welter 1494 5-7 42% 14 OH
21320 Blue Mountain VB 16 1494 22-18 48% 16 MT
21321 Dallas Premier 15-Red corde 1494 4-3 57% 15 TX
21322 NNJ 14-Aceenia 1494 8-8 50% 14 NV
21323 Excel NW 16-2 gold 1494 21-38 36% 16 WA
21324 SOSVBC 15-T faith 1494 7-6 54% 15 NY
21325 SC Rockstar 12-Irina 1494 24-22 52% 12 CA
21326 Greater Cincinnati Volleyball Club 17 17-McCarty/Patterson 1494 30-29 51% 17 OH
21327 Michio Chicago 13 Premier 1494 16-14 53% 13 IL
21328 Dubuque Insanity 16-2 black 1494 1-1 25% 16 IA
21329 GVC 16 1494 3-4 23% 16 IA
21330 Diablo Black 15-1 1494 3-5 38% 15 CA
21331 River City Jrs 13-White 1494 15-14 52% 13 IA
21332 EVA 15-Green david 1494 16-13 55% 15 KY
21333 GSL 14-Comp jac/mike 1494 1-6 14% 14 UT
21334 CNJV 14-1 1494 2-2 40% 14 NE
21335 NRV Heat 13-S 1494 14-14 50% 13 VA
21336 360 16-Kaos cottery 1494 12-11 46% 16 NV
21337 Avoli 10-F natanael 1494 4-3 57% 10 PR
21338 Nova Northeast 14 1494 5-4 45% 14 PA
21339 Ichiban 15-Spartans 1494 2-2 50% 15 GA
21340 Empowered 14-Elite onyx 1494 16-22 42% 14 IN
21341 Dive 16-Black 1494 24-16 60% 16 CO
21342 RPB Spark 13 1494 19-14 58% 13 FL
21343 BeSomeone Goats 10-Navy 1494 7-12 37% 10 TX
21344 Niagara Rapids Elite 18U 1494 7-6 50% 18 OH
21345 Performance 15-2 pink 1494 2-2 50% 15
21346 R1SE Legacy 16 1494 3-2 60% 16 TX
21347 Elevate 17-Fighting falcons 1494 16-17 48% 17 WI
21348 Yorktowne VB 16-Red 1494 31-36 46% 16 PA
21349 AVA 17-Coral m 1494 14-17 45% 17 FL
21350 SVC 17-18 blue 1494 3-4 43% 17 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.