Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 419 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
20901 Raiders 16-Black 1498 2-3 40% 16 MN
20902 Spiketown VBC 16-1 1498 31-24 56% 16 OH
20903 Renaissance 12-Red cran 1498 3-2 60% 12 OH
20904 PVA 13-Gray 1498 7-5 58% 13 MO
20905 Laredo Premier 13-Fusion 1498 4-3 57% 13 TX
20906 Select 12-Travel rhyann 1498 2-1 50% 12 ND
20907 Independent 10-Michelle 1498 3-2 60% 10 IN
20908 KODA 17 Select 1498 26-20 57% 17 NY
20909 Bootheel SMASH 13-C 1498 2-2 40% 13 MO
20910 SMVA 14-1 1498 16-12 55% 14 AL
20911 Northern Lights 10-2 1498 14-15 48% 10 MN
20912 JVB Rush 12 1498 2-1 67% 12 MN
20913 Southern Pines Volleyball Club 16 SPVC Slash Pine 1498 3-3 50% 16 GA
20914 Eastside 10-Kelley 1498 2-2 50% 10 OH
20915 LC Elite 14-1 black 1498 15-17 47% 14 OR
20916 Southern Aces 12-Navy 1498 2-1 40% 12 TX
20917 Orion Chargers 13 Chargers Elite (IA) 1498 9-10 47% 13 IA
20918 Empowered 17-8 black 1498 4-8 33% 17 IN
20919 Ignite AZ 16 Inferno 1498 21-37 36% 16 AZ
20920 Tstreet 15-Madi 1498 20-30 40% 15 CA
20921 Red Volleyball Club 13 * RED VBC Ailee 1498 2-1 67% 13 CO
20922 NKVC 18-Crabtree 1498 3-2 60% 18 WY
20923 GSEVC 16-National black 1498 23-19 55% 16 NJ
20924 Club Velocity YDT 10-Blue 1498 1-1 50% 10 MN
20925 Club 1 14-White 1498 16-16 50% 14 IL
20926 Monarcas 16-Jesus 1498 3-3 50% 16 PR
20927 KRATOS Volley Academy 12 Puppy Pack 1498 2-2 40% 12 CT
20928 EOVBC 12-Gold 1498 5-4 56% 12 OR
20929 Starlings AV 15 Teal 1497 14-12 54% 15 CA
20930 Kali 10-F edalis 1497 6-11 35% 10 PR
20931 STRIKE 15-White 1497 29-18 62% 15 AZ
20932 630 Volleyball 16-1 1497 30-20 60% 16 IL
20933 Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 15-T faith 1497 14-11 56% 15 NJ
20934 319 United 13-Amy 1497 2-2 40% 13 IA
20935 Crush 11 1497 5-5 50% 11 IL
20936 Tr1be Volleyball 16 1497 7-10 41% 16 WY
20937 OWV 14-PURPLE 1497 24-18 57% 14 FL
20938 TAINAS 11 1497 3-2 60% 11 PR
20939 Unified 16-Royal 1497 4-1 80% 16 MI
20940 TuoCo Elite 15-S 1497 10-18 36% 15 CA
20941 DENVER JUNIORS 14 Sara 1497 19-20 49% 14 CO
20942 MoCo Jrs 16 Molten 1497 27-25 52% 16 TX
20943 Nestor 18-Tee 1497 3-4 43% 18 CA
20944 VA Volleyball 18-1 1497 5-8 38% 18 VA
20945 Illinois Select 16U 1497 22-15 59% 16 IL
20946 DBQ Elite 15 1497 5-7 36% 15 IA
20947 797 Empire 17 1497 2-3 40% 17 TX
20948 Cutthroat 14-2 1497 8-6 35% 14 MT
20949 CJVA 17 Onyx 1497 30-41 42% 17 NJ
20950 Grandlake 18-R yoder 1497 3-4 43% 18 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.