Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 416 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
20751 Ocean Bay 13-Surf 1499 2-2 50% 13 FL
20752 NE Elite 17-Echo 1499 4-4 50% 17 NE
20753 KMS SAINTS JO 14-Call 1499 2-2 50% 14 MN
20754 The Academy Volleyball Club 14-1 1499 2-2 50% 14 IN
20755 KVBC 13-1 1499 1-3 25% 13 MN
20756 RVA Girls 12U 1499 2-2 50% 12 MD
20757 TKVBC 17-1 1499 2-2 50% 17 GA
20758 Crossfire VBC 13-Heat 1499 12-8 60% 13 WI
20759 Beach Cities 16 Gold 1499 24-23 51% 16 CA
20760 Apex Volleyball Club 18-1 1499 2-2 50% 18 MO
20761 Apex NW 15-Elevate 1499 16-19 46% 15 WA
20762 808 Athletic Club 17-S 1499 11-11 50% 17 HI
20763 Showtime 13-1 1499 5-2 71% 13 TX
20764 TAV Houston 12 Silver 1499 13-10 54% 12 TX
20765 Lions SWest Prairie 15-1 1499 46-42 52% 15 IL
20766 Actyve 18-Adidas 1499 8-7 53% 18 CA
20767 Aftershock 18-Black 1499 22-20 52% 18 CA
20768 Tampa North 17-Black 1499 23-32 42% 17 FL
20769 A5 Gwinnett 12-Karen 1499 22-20 52% 12 GA
20770 EXCELL 15-3 megan yellow 1499 18-15 55% 15 SC
20771 EVA 14 National 1499 31-26 54% 14 AR
20772 Champions 13-1 1499 7-6 54% 13 AL
20773 Blue 14-1 1499 16-15 52% 14 MI
20774 Tyrants 12-Black 1499 25-21 54% 12 CA
20775 Starlings S-N-P 14-Coach jennifer 1499 6-10 38% 14 CA
20776 Cajun Elite 14 Melissa 1499 19-15 56% 14 LA
20777 CADO 18-3 1499 3-2 60% 18 NY
20778 Panhandle Performance 14-G 1499 11-8 58% 14 TX
20779 Net Force Volleyball Club 14 Net Force Blaze (IA) 1499 5-3 56% 14 IA
20780 Na Koa VBC 12 1499 7-4 64% 12 HI
20781 CSF 16-Legacy 1499 36-22 62% 16 NC
20782 Black Swamp 13-4 1499 5-4 56% 13 OH
20783 Elite Primetime 13-1 1499 13-11 52% 13 TX
20784 Matchbox 18-Black 1499 13-8 62% 18 SD
20785 LHV Girls 16-3 braves 1499 18-15 55% 16 MA
20786 NPJ Portland 15 Premier 1499 22-30 42% 15 OR
20787 Niagara Rapids Power 17 1499 4-3 57% 17 OH
20788 Golden State 16-Black 1499 13-12 52% 16 CA
20789 Pearl City Power 14-Purple 1499 1-1 25% 14 IA
20790 Iowa United 15-1 regional 1499 6-6 46% 15 IA
20791 Roots 13-3 maple 1499 18-19 49% 13 TX
20792 TMHPP TMH 14-Pink 1499 14-13 52% 14 CO
20793 Shockwave Volleyball Club 15 15U SWVC Blue 1499 10-10 43% 15
20794 Adidas OPV 14-1 national 1499 16-18 47% 14 OR
20795 GAVA 16-1 1499 6-2 75% 16 UT
20796 LTVC 17-1 1499 3-3 50% 17 NV
20797 EU 11-Black 1499 15-11 58% 11 IN
20798 XP 14-National 1 1499 22-17 56% 14 IL
20799 AVA TX 12-Attack 1499 8-12 38% 12 TX
20800 Interlake Volleyball Club 15-Erin 1499 5-2 71% 15
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.