2025-2026 Season — Page 410 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20451 | Downstate 18-Red | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | NY |
| 20452 | Austin Performance Volleyball 16-Pipes | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | TX |
| 20453 | SC Rockstar 15-Adam | 1500 | 21-32 | 40% | 15 | CA |
| 20454 | R2R Volleyball Club 12-Black | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | PA |
| 20455 | Southern California Volleyball Club 12-Rachel | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | CA |
| 20456 | VC United 12-Molten | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | IL |
| 20457 | A5 Gwinnett 16-Kristen | 1500 | 28-20 | 58% | 16 | GA |
| 20458 | RRIV 14-Winter | 1500 | 7-5 | 50% | 14 | ND |
| 20459 | SMAK Volleyball Academy 13-Royal andrii sierra | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 13 | MI |
| 20460 | Integrity 13-Lim c1 blue | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 13 | PA |
| 20461 | HP Illinois 16-2 select | 1500 | 16-18 | 46% | 16 | MO |
| 20462 | Star Aquila G16-1 | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | |
| 20463 | JOMO G13-1 | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 13 | MO |
| 20464 | 360 Volleyball Club 13-Ultra | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 13 | TX |
| 20465 | Mt. Hood Volleyball Club 16-Regional | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | OR |
| 20466 | MN Select 12-Molten | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | MN |
| 20467 | Northside Out Chicago 12-Elite | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | IL |
| 20468 | Club Tonka 12-Valley | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | MN |
| 20469 | North Star Volleybal Club 12-Ren | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | WI |
| 20470 | Rutherford County Volleyball Club 13-Sofia | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 13 | NC |
| 20471 | Bulgarian Volleyball Academy 12-Curtis | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | IL |
| 20472 | Central Arkansas Volleyball 12-National | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | AR |
| 20473 | Roots Volleyball Academy 13-Adidas | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 13 | IA |
| 20474 | Hanai Volleyball Club 13-White | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 13 | AZ |
| 20475 | Strike Valley Volleyball Club 16-Premier | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | NY |
| 20476 | Club MVP G12-1 | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | MO |
| 20477 | Net 12-S | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | AR |
| 20478 | Excel 13-Nat blue | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 13 | TX |
| 20479 | DE.Ozark Juniors 12-4 white | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | AR |
| 20480 | Austin Performance Volleyball 16-Ponto | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | TX |
| 20481 | SC Elite 15-Gold | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 15 | SC |
| 20482 | Amarillo Xtreme Volleyball 12-Roshambo | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | TX |
| 20483 | Elevate VBC 16-Sam | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | TX |
| 20484 | ETA1 12-White | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | TX |
| 20485 | Roots Volleyball Academy 12-Adidas | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | IA |
| 20486 | Benson 16 | 1500 | 3-2 | 60% | 16 | MN |
| 20487 | DE.Ozark Juniors G11-1 | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 11 | AR |
| 20488 | Adversity-Wisconsin 12-Swift lindsay | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | WI |
| 20489 | Pacific Coast VC 16-Blue | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | WA |
| 20490 | DE.Ozark Juniors 12-2 blue | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | AR |
| 20491 | ACE Test Team 12 | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | MN |
| 20492 | Top Flight Volleyball Academy 17-Hayden | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 17 | NV |
| 20493 | MTA 16-U | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | IL |
| 20494 | MADFROG 14-Elite green | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | TX |
| 20495 | Ashland Aces 11U | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 11 | KY |
| 20496 | EMV 12-Royal kate | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | TX |
| 20497 | House of Sports 17-National | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 17 | NY |
| 20498 | MADFROG 14-Elite black | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | TX |
| 20499 | Sports Performance 17-Sapphire | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 17 | IL |
| 20500 | 417 Resilience VBC G14-2 | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | MO |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.