2025-2026 Season — Page 407 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20301 | Independent 14-Yochum | 1501 | 3-3 | 50% | 14 | IN |
| 20302 | HCVC 18-1 | 1501 | 6-8 | 43% | 18 | OH |
| 20303 | H Skyline 13-Gray | 1501 | 8-11 | 42% | 13 | TX |
| 20304 | Empower 16-Ember | 1501 | 44-21 | 68% | 16 | IL |
| 20305 | Southern Heat 15-Purple | 1501 | 5-3 | 56% | 15 | WI |
| 20306 | MTRX 12 Vipers | 1501 | 20-22 | 48% | 12 | AZ |
| 20307 | Academy Volleyball Club 16 | 1501 | 30-30 | 47% | 16 | DE |
| 20308 | H. Skyline TW 14-2 | 1501 | 2-6 | 25% | 14 | TX |
| 20309 | GCVC 16-Ramblers | 1501 | 4-4 | 50% | 16 | IN |
| 20310 | South Strand Heat 12 | 1501 | 13-11 | 54% | 12 | SC |
| 20311 | EU 12-Silver | 1501 | 15-15 | 50% | 12 | IN |
| 20312 | Iowa United 16-1 premier | 1501 | 13-11 | 52% | 16 | IA |
| 20313 | Bootheel SMASH 16 Bootheel SMASH Chaos (GW) | 1501 | 11-12 | 46% | 16 | MO |
| 20314 | Tiger 13 | 1501 | 2-2 | 50% | 13 | IA |
| 20315 | Max Apex Elite VBC 13 Max Apex Elite Onyx (GW) | 1501 | 1-1 | 25% | 13 | MO |
| 20316 | SoDak Juniors 17 Elite | 1501 | 20-23 | 47% | 17 | MN |
| 20317 | Team Velocity 15-Black | 1501 | 7-7 | 50% | 15 | CO |
| 20318 | Crossfire 16-Black | 1501 | 31-27 | 53% | 16 | MN |
| 20319 | NH Seacoast 15-Open | 1501 | 13-32 | 29% | 15 | NH |
| 20320 | Stingray Black 13-1 | 1501 | 5-3 | 63% | 13 | CA |
| 20321 | Upstate 18 Seneca | 1501 | 16-17 | 48% | 18 | SC |
| 20322 | NFW Ryze 16 16.1 Premier National (NT) | 1501 | 1-6 | 14% | 16 | TX |
| 20323 | OK Elite 14-Gold-jensik | 1501 | 14-17 | 40% | 14 | OK |
| 20324 | Platinum 11-Ace | 1501 | 3-3 | 50% | 11 | UT |
| 20325 | NRG 14-National navy | 1501 | 18-16 | 47% | 14 | TX |
| 20326 | NMPVC 15-1 | 1501 | 22-14 | 61% | 15 | TX |
| 20327 | Iowa Vortex 18 | 1501 | 1-0 | 25% | 18 | IA |
| 20328 | Infinite Training VC 14-1 | 1501 | 4-3 | 57% | 14 | CA |
| 20329 | UVC 14-Farhad/tevyn | 1501 | 6-17 | 26% | 14 | CA |
| 20330 | NE Velo 11-2s | 1501 | 2-2 | 50% | 11 | MN |
| 20331 | Long Island Fury Volleyball II Inc 14-Sarah | 1501 | 1-4 | 20% | 14 | NJ |
| 20332 | Barefoot 17-Navy | 1501 | 8-6 | 50% | 17 | TX |
| 20333 | Dakota Summit 14-1 | 1501 | 3-3 | 30% | 14 | ND |
| 20334 | Black Rock Adrienne/Dan 17 | 1501 | 12-8 | 55% | 17 | UT |
| 20335 | HPSTL 13-Gray | 1501 | 16-17 | 44% | 13 | MO |
| 20336 | Wrecking Crew 17-Black | 1501 | 3-2 | 60% | 17 | TX |
| 20337 | 360 14-1 | 1501 | 16-16 | 46% | 14 | TX |
| 20338 | BAVC 16-Premier sandra | 1501 | 14-15 | 48% | 16 | CA |
| 20339 | Reign 13-Blue | 1501 | 20-16 | 56% | 13 | FL |
| 20340 | Lockdown VBC 11-Hummingbirds | 1501 | 17-14 | 55% | 11 | MA |
| 20341 | Club One AZ 15-Blue | 1501 | 22-18 | 55% | 15 | AZ |
| 20342 | EAVC 14-1 | 1501 | 3-5 | 38% | 14 | NV |
| 20343 | NIVB 16-Black | 1501 | 13-16 | 43% | 16 | MN |
| 20344 | PV 11-Gray | 1501 | 5-3 | 50% | 11 | IA |
| 20345 | Madison Elite 16 Teal | 1501 | 40-22 | 65% | 16 | WI |
| 20346 | PSVA Tri County 18-S | 1501 | 15-19 | 44% | 18 | FL |
| 20347 | MN Freeze 14-Black | 1501 | 9-6 | 60% | 14 | MN |
| 20348 | NVA 12-White | 1501 | 3-2 | 60% | 12 | PA |
| 20349 | Crossfire VBC 16-Blaze | 1501 | 15-12 | 56% | 16 | WI |
| 20350 | A4 Volley 13-Keilan | 1501 | 21-21 | 50% | 13 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.