Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 407 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
20301 Independent 14-Yochum 1501 3-3 50% 14 IN
20302 HCVC 18-1 1501 6-8 43% 18 OH
20303 H Skyline 13-Gray 1501 8-11 42% 13 TX
20304 Empower 16-Ember 1501 44-21 68% 16 IL
20305 Southern Heat 15-Purple 1501 5-3 56% 15 WI
20306 MTRX 12 Vipers 1501 20-22 48% 12 AZ
20307 Academy Volleyball Club 16 1501 30-30 47% 16 DE
20308 H. Skyline TW 14-2 1501 2-6 25% 14 TX
20309 GCVC 16-Ramblers 1501 4-4 50% 16 IN
20310 South Strand Heat 12 1501 13-11 54% 12 SC
20311 EU 12-Silver 1501 15-15 50% 12 IN
20312 Iowa United 16-1 premier 1501 13-11 52% 16 IA
20313 Bootheel SMASH 16 Bootheel SMASH Chaos (GW) 1501 11-12 46% 16 MO
20314 Tiger 13 1501 2-2 50% 13 IA
20315 Max Apex Elite VBC 13 Max Apex Elite Onyx (GW) 1501 1-1 25% 13 MO
20316 SoDak Juniors 17 Elite 1501 20-23 47% 17 MN
20317 Team Velocity 15-Black 1501 7-7 50% 15 CO
20318 Crossfire 16-Black 1501 31-27 53% 16 MN
20319 NH Seacoast 15-Open 1501 13-32 29% 15 NH
20320 Stingray Black 13-1 1501 5-3 63% 13 CA
20321 Upstate 18 Seneca 1501 16-17 48% 18 SC
20322 NFW Ryze 16 16.1 Premier National (NT) 1501 1-6 14% 16 TX
20323 OK Elite 14-Gold-jensik 1501 14-17 40% 14 OK
20324 Platinum 11-Ace 1501 3-3 50% 11 UT
20325 NRG 14-National navy 1501 18-16 47% 14 TX
20326 NMPVC 15-1 1501 22-14 61% 15 TX
20327 Iowa Vortex 18 1501 1-0 25% 18 IA
20328 Infinite Training VC 14-1 1501 4-3 57% 14 CA
20329 UVC 14-Farhad/tevyn 1501 6-17 26% 14 CA
20330 NE Velo 11-2s 1501 2-2 50% 11 MN
20331 Long Island Fury Volleyball II Inc 14-Sarah 1501 1-4 20% 14 NJ
20332 Barefoot 17-Navy 1501 8-6 50% 17 TX
20333 Dakota Summit 14-1 1501 3-3 30% 14 ND
20334 Black Rock Adrienne/Dan 17 1501 12-8 55% 17 UT
20335 HPSTL 13-Gray 1501 16-17 44% 13 MO
20336 Wrecking Crew 17-Black 1501 3-2 60% 17 TX
20337 360 14-1 1501 16-16 46% 14 TX
20338 BAVC 16-Premier sandra 1501 14-15 48% 16 CA
20339 Reign 13-Blue 1501 20-16 56% 13 FL
20340 Lockdown VBC 11-Hummingbirds 1501 17-14 55% 11 MA
20341 Club One AZ 15-Blue 1501 22-18 55% 15 AZ
20342 EAVC 14-1 1501 3-5 38% 14 NV
20343 NIVB 16-Black 1501 13-16 43% 16 MN
20344 PV 11-Gray 1501 5-3 50% 11 IA
20345 Madison Elite 16 Teal 1501 40-22 65% 16 WI
20346 PSVA Tri County 18-S 1501 15-19 44% 18 FL
20347 MN Freeze 14-Black 1501 9-6 60% 14 MN
20348 NVA 12-White 1501 3-2 60% 12 PA
20349 Crossfire VBC 16-Blaze 1501 15-12 56% 16 WI
20350 A4 Volley 13-Keilan 1501 21-21 50% 13 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.