Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 369 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
18401 Henderson 15-1 1520 13-10 57% 15 CA
18402 VCN 13-White 1520 8-2 80% 13 NE
18403 HVVC 16-BLUE 1520 27-22 55% 16 MI
18404 NRG 12-National navy 1520 13-22 35% 12 TX
18405 TI Elite 13.2 1520 42-28 60% 13 IN
18406 Mid City VBC 14-Blue 1520 12-16 43% 14 CA
18407 MANAKOA 14-S 1520 19-13 59% 14 CA
18408 Club SyrV 13-New york 1520 18-12 53% 13 NY
18409 AVA 13-N brainard 1520 25-24 51% 13 OH
18410 Net Force 15-2 legacy 1520 22-19 46% 15 IA
18411 Rogue1 Elite 18-1 1520 28-20 58% 18 NC
18412 Academy 13 Pearl 1520 25-21 54% 13 NC
18413 Hub City 14u 1520 25-22 51% 14 MD
18414 Niagara Frontier 17-White 1520 10-10 42% 17 NY
18415 MWVC 13-Barcelo 1520 4-2 67% 13 PR
18416 PVC 14-Black 1520 15-11 54% 14 IA
18417 Fresno Heat HEAT 17-National boo 1520 2-6 25% 17 NV
18418 NorthShore 13-Ringler 1520 14-10 58% 13 OH
18419 MVBC 15-Red 1520 26-24 52% 15 NJ
18420 MiElite 12-Claire north 1520 6-3 60% 12 MI
18421 414 14-Blue 1520 21-23 48% 14 WI
18422 Chaska Juniors 12-Gold 1520 14-12 54% 12 MN
18423 WGVA 12-Black 1520 3-1 75% 12 GA
18424 FTL 13-Fusion daniel 1520 22-32 41% 13 FL
18425 ARAA 11-Maroon 1520 2-2 50% 11 MN
18426 H Skyline 11-White 1520 5-8 38% 11 TX
18427 Triangle 12 Silver 1520 6-3 67% 12 NC
18428 EVP Fury 15-2 1520 4-4 40% 15 ON
18429 Xcel VB 16-1 purple 1520 12-11 44% 16 AL
18430 A5 10 Becky 1520 21-18 54% 10 GA
18431 Odessa 4G VBC 15 O4G FIERCE 1520 16-10 62% 15 TX
18432 OYA 12-Prime 1520 22-14 61% 12 CA
18433 DIG 11-A mari 1520 1-0 25% 11 TX
18434 The Edge 13-Black 1520 33-21 61% 13 CO
18435 Pride Volleyball Club 13 13s Shelly/Alyse (BY) 1519 4-4 40% 13 LA
18436 Whirlwind 16-Elite 1519 8-8 42% 16 NY
18437 AJV 15-Futurewilcoalliance 1519 8-11 42% 15 TX
18438 WOJRS 13 1519 5-4 56% 13
18439 Avoli 17-F dariel 1519 6-12 33% 17 PR
18440 BRVA 12-2 1519 16-15 47% 12 VA
18441 Ama Xtreme 17-Blackout 1519 5-3 56% 17
18442 ROX 16 1519 15-16 48% 16 NC
18443 South County 16-Blue 1519 20-26 43% 16 RI
18444 407 15-White 1519 34-37 48% 15 FL
18445 Prime 14-Molten 1519 13-16 45% 14 CA
18446 Areté 17-Navy 1519 17-21 44% 17 TX
18447 SpikeHers 17-Gold 1519 16-26 38% 17 NY
18448 417 Juniors 15-2 1519 2-2 50% 15 MO
18449 PCS Club Volleyball 12-1 1519 4-3 36% 12 ND
18450 SPIRIT VBC 14-1 1519 23-23 50% 14 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.