Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 348 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
17351 Hype 14-1 1531 38-22 62% 14 MN
17352 Infinity 15-National 1531 33-27 55% 15 CO
17353 316VBC G17-1 1531 7-6 41% 17 KS
17354 Monsters 15-Ts 1531 5-4 50% 15 MI
17355 MC 15-1 shepherd 1531 3-4 43% 15 MT
17356 SPARK 16-1 1531 16-5 76% 16 OK
17357 Legend 15-Black 1531 15-9 63% 15 CA
17358 Premier 15-Red alyssa 1531 19-19 46% 15 TX
17359 UNION 13-In grey 1531 29-17 63% 13 IN
17360 Ne Jrs 15-Black 1531 18-26 41% 15 NE
17361 NSVA 16-1 1531 4-2 67% 16 CA
17362 The Edge 12 Elite 1531 19-13 54% 12 IL
17363 GSA 13 1531 4-2 67% 13 ID
17364 NCWVBC 16-3 red 1531 13-11 54% 16 WA
17365 T4VBC 15-Blue 1531 15-8 58% 15 TX
17366 NLVC 10-Royal 1531 17-18 49% 10 TX
17367 Sunset West 11-Savages 1531 2-1 40% 11 NE
17368 Chaos VBC CHAOS GIRLS 13-1 national 1531 7-2 78% 13 OR
17369 Club 217 16-Sydney 1531 9-6 60% 16 IL
17370 Valley Rebels 13-1 1531 6-2 75% 13 CA
17371 TVS 11 Kait 1531 7-5 50% 11 TX
17372 Synergy VBC 14-Force 1531 4-3 44% 14 NY
17373 M2 Volleyball 18-E2 1531 32-29 52% 18 GA
17374 Shoreline 16 1531 5-1 83% 16 MN
17375 Nf PIrates 13 Gold 1531 16-11 59% 13 FL
17376 PI RAGE 16-1 1531 12-11 52% 16 MN
17377 310VBC 17-Chase 1531 5-3 63% 17 CA
17378 NW Jrs 14-Blue 1531 23-34 40% 14 WA
17379 Monsters 14-Blue 1531 24-8 75% 14 MI
17380 YAVBC 16 1531 4-1 80% 16 SD
17381 Downstate 12-Cobras 1531 20-12 63% 12 NY
17382 RockCity 11-R1 1531 7-3 70% 11 OH
17383 NCL 18-Blue 1531 11-6 65% 18 WA
17384 Blaze 18-1 1531 13-7 65% 18 IA
17385 SCBandits 14-2 1530 9-6 60% 14 ON
17386 BCYVBWolfpack 15-Blue 1530 7-3 70% 15 BC
17387 MN Attack 16-2 1530 12-7 63% 16 MN
17388 SoFLO 16 1530 35-19 65% 16 FL
17389 Top Flight Volleyball Academy 13 Fairies 1530 4-1 80% 13 NV
17390 BVC 15-1 beasts 1530 1-7 13% 15 DE
17391 Cincy Crush 14-2 1530 28-22 56% 14 OH
17392 TW Skyline 11-Royal 1530 12-13 48% 11 TX
17393 Ashland 16-1 1530 4-3 57% 16 NV
17394 Emerald Rain 13 Elite 1530 28-38 42% 13 WA
17395 OMNI 17 Power 1530 20-30 40% 17 CA
17396 TRUVC 15 1530 8-5 62% 15 TX
17397 Wildfire 12-Mackenzie 1530 21-16 57% 12 FL
17398 Arkansas Elite 13-3 1530 14-11 56% 13 AR
17399 REDLINE 14-Black 1530 15-10 60% 14 MI
17400 513VB 11-3 1530 15-10 60% 11 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.