2025-2026 Season — Page 348 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17351 | Hype 14-1 | 1531 | 38-22 | 62% | 14 | MN |
| 17352 | Infinity 15-National | 1531 | 33-27 | 55% | 15 | CO |
| 17353 | 316VBC G17-1 | 1531 | 7-6 | 41% | 17 | KS |
| 17354 | Monsters 15-Ts | 1531 | 5-4 | 50% | 15 | MI |
| 17355 | MC 15-1 shepherd | 1531 | 3-4 | 43% | 15 | MT |
| 17356 | SPARK 16-1 | 1531 | 16-5 | 76% | 16 | OK |
| 17357 | Legend 15-Black | 1531 | 15-9 | 63% | 15 | CA |
| 17358 | Premier 15-Red alyssa | 1531 | 19-19 | 46% | 15 | TX |
| 17359 | UNION 13-In grey | 1531 | 29-17 | 63% | 13 | IN |
| 17360 | Ne Jrs 15-Black | 1531 | 18-26 | 41% | 15 | NE |
| 17361 | NSVA 16-1 | 1531 | 4-2 | 67% | 16 | CA |
| 17362 | The Edge 12 Elite | 1531 | 19-13 | 54% | 12 | IL |
| 17363 | GSA 13 | 1531 | 4-2 | 67% | 13 | ID |
| 17364 | NCWVBC 16-3 red | 1531 | 13-11 | 54% | 16 | WA |
| 17365 | T4VBC 15-Blue | 1531 | 15-8 | 58% | 15 | TX |
| 17366 | NLVC 10-Royal | 1531 | 17-18 | 49% | 10 | TX |
| 17367 | Sunset West 11-Savages | 1531 | 2-1 | 40% | 11 | NE |
| 17368 | Chaos VBC CHAOS GIRLS 13-1 national | 1531 | 7-2 | 78% | 13 | OR |
| 17369 | Club 217 16-Sydney | 1531 | 9-6 | 60% | 16 | IL |
| 17370 | Valley Rebels 13-1 | 1531 | 6-2 | 75% | 13 | CA |
| 17371 | TVS 11 Kait | 1531 | 7-5 | 50% | 11 | TX |
| 17372 | Synergy VBC 14-Force | 1531 | 4-3 | 44% | 14 | NY |
| 17373 | M2 Volleyball 18-E2 | 1531 | 32-29 | 52% | 18 | GA |
| 17374 | Shoreline 16 | 1531 | 5-1 | 83% | 16 | MN |
| 17375 | Nf PIrates 13 Gold | 1531 | 16-11 | 59% | 13 | FL |
| 17376 | PI RAGE 16-1 | 1531 | 12-11 | 52% | 16 | MN |
| 17377 | 310VBC 17-Chase | 1531 | 5-3 | 63% | 17 | CA |
| 17378 | NW Jrs 14-Blue | 1531 | 23-34 | 40% | 14 | WA |
| 17379 | Monsters 14-Blue | 1531 | 24-8 | 75% | 14 | MI |
| 17380 | YAVBC 16 | 1531 | 4-1 | 80% | 16 | SD |
| 17381 | Downstate 12-Cobras | 1531 | 20-12 | 63% | 12 | NY |
| 17382 | RockCity 11-R1 | 1531 | 7-3 | 70% | 11 | OH |
| 17383 | NCL 18-Blue | 1531 | 11-6 | 65% | 18 | WA |
| 17384 | Blaze 18-1 | 1531 | 13-7 | 65% | 18 | IA |
| 17385 | SCBandits 14-2 | 1530 | 9-6 | 60% | 14 | ON |
| 17386 | BCYVBWolfpack 15-Blue | 1530 | 7-3 | 70% | 15 | BC |
| 17387 | MN Attack 16-2 | 1530 | 12-7 | 63% | 16 | MN |
| 17388 | SoFLO 16 | 1530 | 35-19 | 65% | 16 | FL |
| 17389 | Top Flight Volleyball Academy 13 Fairies | 1530 | 4-1 | 80% | 13 | NV |
| 17390 | BVC 15-1 beasts | 1530 | 1-7 | 13% | 15 | DE |
| 17391 | Cincy Crush 14-2 | 1530 | 28-22 | 56% | 14 | OH |
| 17392 | TW Skyline 11-Royal | 1530 | 12-13 | 48% | 11 | TX |
| 17393 | Ashland 16-1 | 1530 | 4-3 | 57% | 16 | NV |
| 17394 | Emerald Rain 13 Elite | 1530 | 28-38 | 42% | 13 | WA |
| 17395 | OMNI 17 Power | 1530 | 20-30 | 40% | 17 | CA |
| 17396 | TRUVC 15 | 1530 | 8-5 | 62% | 15 | TX |
| 17397 | Wildfire 12-Mackenzie | 1530 | 21-16 | 57% | 12 | FL |
| 17398 | Arkansas Elite 13-3 | 1530 | 14-11 | 56% | 13 | AR |
| 17399 | REDLINE 14-Black | 1530 | 15-10 | 60% | 14 | MI |
| 17400 | 513VB 11-3 | 1530 | 15-10 | 60% | 11 | OH |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.